Study of Oahspe

The scientific, spiritual, historical, and prophetic study of the amazing book named Oahspe. OAHSPE is a NEW BIBLE in the WORDS OF JEHOVIH and his Angel Embassadors. The old Bible was written 2,000 or 3,000 years ago and was written for that time, like an elementary school book was written for elementary children. The old Bible was written for the Iron Age. OAHSPE is a college book for man of this modern Atomic/Space Age and Information Age with new revelations to man. As Oahspe says It is not the purpose of these revelations to work out prophecies, leaving nothing
for man to do. But to call his attention to the unseen forces ... Where humanity has no knowledge of forces and currents of the unseen worlds and their influence over the seen worlds, only revelations can reach them. After reading my website please sign my guestbook at http://www.studyofoahspe.com/id4.html near the bottom of the Miscellaneous page.

For a large part, Oahspe remains a sealed book. It uses a private vocabulary which is only partially explained; and describes events of mysterious significance. There are hundreds of pages about the deeds of a vast array of Gods and Goddesses who roam the universe in enormous vessels.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/oah/oah/index.htm

In the pages of this website I have unsealed, deciphered, verified and confirmed much of Oahspe to help you the student understand the book. I have pioneered work on Oahspe along with others I quote.

Although there are groups and organizations associated with Oahspe, there are many who have studied Oahspe for years and do not belong to any Oahspe based group or organization.

Although The Vortex motion of planets was discussed in philosophical publications for several hundred years prior to Oahspe (the writings of Sir Isaac Newton and Rene Descartes, etc..) none of these earlier publications described the size and comet-like shape of the earth's magnetosphere, nor the cause of the Aurora Borealis, or that the solar vortex and the earth's vortex are connected, nor the configuration of spiral, bared-spiral and elliptical galaxies throughout the universe. Nor did Newton or Descartes write that Nebulae was the birthplace of stars, or that the substance of the living can be found in Nebula. Nor did Newton or Descartes show the solar system vortex. Nor did Newton or Descartes describe the "needles" or "strings" shape of sub-atomic matter, or the solar orbit around the galaxy. Nor did Newton or Descartes describe cold diffuse matter in interstellar space, or massive dark matter objects. Nor did Newton or Descartes mention 100 elements of matter, or the equivalence of mass and energy, or Einstein's E=MC² in statement form. Nor did Newton or Descartes describe stellar life cycles, or show the sun in its half life cycle. None of the publications that preceded Oahspe had knowledge of the modern Olympic games. Newborough could not have "copied" this information from earlier publications.

Interesting to note here is the fact that there is no physical mechanism in the near-vacuum of outer space to compress gas into a ball. A cloud of hydrogen gas must be compressed to a small enough size so that gravity can dominate it. For example, our own sun is a stable sphere of gas. But what force could initially press it into a ball? Scientists have no answer. Experiments indicate that it would be next to impossible for floating gas molecules out in space to clump together. There is nothing to compress it. How could the stars evolve from floating gasses? Gravity is not a sufficient mechanism to do this. In outer space, the gas is millions of times more expansive than the critical compressed size needed for gravity to hold it as a stable star. Because of this, outward gas pressures cause these clouds to keep spreading outward! They do not pull together, but instead gradually move outward. In spite of all the starry theories of the evolutionists, the fact remains that gas in outer space always has a density so rarified that it is far less than the emptiest atmospheric vacuum bottle in any laboratory in the world! How could such rarified hydrogen "push itself" into planets and stars? How then did the lumps [the galaxies, stars, planets, moons, and asteroids] get there?

Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter II: 12. But nowhere in etherea is there a solution of corpor sufficient to put itself in motion; nor sufficient to condense itself; nor to provide the road of its travel.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/oah/oah/oah403.htm

"Few cosmologists [theorists about the origin of matter and the universe] today would dispute the view that our expanding universe began with a bang—a big hot bang—about 18 billion years ago. Paradoxically, no cosmologist could now tell you how the Big Bang ultimately gave rise to galaxies, stars, and other cosmic lumps.

"As one sky scientist, IBM's Philip E. Seiden, put it, 'The Standard Big Bang model does not give rise to lumpiness. That model assumes the universe started out as a globally smooth, homogeneous expanding gas. If you apply the laws of physics to this model, you get a universe that is uniform, a cosmic vastness of evenly distributed atoms with no organization of any kind . .

"How then did the lumps [the galaxies, stars, planets, moons, and asteroids] get there? No one can say, at least not yet and perhaps not ever." —*Ben Patrusky, "Why is the Cosmos Lumpy?" in Science 81, June 1981, p. 96.
I believe Oahspe's "etheic solution in rotary motion" or vortex is the cause of compressing inter-stellar gas into a ball that creates stars and planets.

John Bell, interviewed by Paul Davies in "The Ghost in the Atom" has suggested that an aether theory might help resolve the EPR paradox by allowing a reference frame in which signals go faster than light. He suggests Lorentz contraction is perfectly coherent, not inconsistent with relativity, and could produce an aether theory perfectly consistent with the Michelson-Morley experiment. Bell suggests the aether was wrongly rejected on purely philosophical grounds: "what is unobservable does not exist" [p.49]. Einstein found the non-aether theory simpler and more elegant, but Bell suggests that doesn't rule it out. Besides the arguments based on his interpretation of quantum mechanics, Bell also suggests resurrecting the aether because it is a useful pedagogical device. That is, many problems are solved more easily by imagining the existence of an aether.

Quantum mechanics can be used to describe spacetime as being "bitty" at extremely small scales, fluctuating and generating particle pairs that appear and disappear incredibly quickly. Instead of being "smooth", the vacuum is described as looking like "quantum foam". It has been suggested that this seething mass of virtual particles may be the equivalent in modern physics of a particulate aether.

Dark energy is sometimes called quintessence due to its similarity to the classical aether. Modern physics is full of concepts such as free space, spin foam, Planck particles, quantum wave state (QWS), zero-point energy, quantum foam, and vacuum energy.

The 19th century had the ether, the 20th century had the quantum wave state, quantum foam and the EPR Effect (inseparabilty).

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oahspe

"Oahspe is also a book that has numerous “firsts” i.e. it is the first to use the word “Starship” long before science-fiction writers conceived of interstellar space travel, and also the first to reveal details of a sunken continent in Pacific Ocean whose remnants include Japan, several decades before Lemuria or Mu were thought have been located in the Pacific Ocean. A cosmogony that gives details of the field of force of the sun and the planets, including comets. Describing properties not known at the time, naming the hottest part of the sun as the photosphere, describing the sun’s field of force that reaches beyond Neptune and pushes the tails of comets away from it (the cosmic wind was not postulated until more than half a century later), identifying the outer small bodies before even the first of them was first sighted (Pluto was discovered half a century later)....to name a few."

Are you in search of an understanding of the Universe and life? Would you like to know the origin, purpose, and destiny of mankind? Then Oahspe is a book for you. Study Oahspe and find out just how amazing it is.

On page 2 of OAHSPE verses 24 and 25 it states clearly that OAHSPE is not a perfect book so it is not surprising that it contains some errors. OAHSPE also states plainly that the revelations in it are not all new to mortals, so it would not be surprising to find some information in it from previous sources. The author/messenger of OAHSPE is not important. It is the Message that is important, so anyone who is or has attacked John Ballou Newbrough is wasting their time and is missing the message.

Ray Palmer said Oahspe's BOOK OF COSMOGONY might have been written by today's space scientist [space age scientist from 1957 to present]. Much of the science in Oahspe has only recently been "discovered". Newbrough could not have "guessed" so rightly especially in the face of all the authorities of his day. Today [since 1958] space satellites are discovering "how it is" out in space, while in 1882 [first written in 1881] OAHSPE contained the same information! As an instance, the now famous Van Allen radiation belts complete as to nature, shape, and height. The scientific reader is overwelmed by the science of Oahspe.

<>
The Van Allen belts were discovered by American space scientist James Van Allen in 1958 ... The inner belt normally extends from about 1,000 miles above Earth to 8,000 miles (1,600 to 13,000 kilometers). After a gap, the outer belt runs from around 12,000 to 25,000 miles (19,000 to 40,000 km).

http://www.space.com/17030-radiation-belt-storm-probes-van-allen-belts.html

Van Al·len belt (v

Either of two zones of high-intensity particulate radiation trapped in Earth's magnetic field and surrounding the planet, beginning at an altitude of about 800 kilometers (500 miles) and extending tens of thousands of kilometers into space.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Van+Allen+belt

OAHSPE'S BOOK OF COSMOGONY

Chapter 4

2. The belt in atmospherea where these things happen is usually about five, six or seven hundred miles up from the earth's surface. But the belt sometimes ascends a thousand miles. At other distances upward other belts exist; and others still beyond, and so on.

^{These statements
discuss what is now known as the Van Allen belt, not discovered until the following century. An article in Scientific American
March, 1959, describes the Van Allen belts to exist from five hundred up to ten thousand feet [miles]. - Martha Helene Jones}

^<>

Any comments about Oahspe or this website? Email Me. I look forward to talking to you about Oahspe and this website

OAHSPE contains much information in it that has proven to be true, example; Oahspe said that the Earth has a invisible vortex around it, and that the vortex was comet shaped. The vortex was 42,000 miles from the surface of the earth to the rim of the nose with variations, the tail of the vortex streches somewhat beyond the moon. OAHSPE said that magnetism was one of the manifestations of the vortex.

In 1958 when the U.S. first sent up space satellites scientist discovered the invisible magnetosphere of the Earth. They discovered that the magnetosphere was comet shaped and that it was aprox. 40,365 miles from the surface of the earth to the nose which fluctuates. Scientist also discovered the magnetotail streched well beyond the moon. The magnetosphere was first theorized in 1931, but OAHSPE had that information 1n 1881(original manuscript before publishing).

An Astronomer in 1997 said "The OAHSPE author has described the interaction of presumably the solar vortex with planetary or cometary vortices and deduced correctly what the effect of solar emmanations on a diffuse spherical structure would be." The other interesting thing about that is not only was the magnetosphere unknown then, but so was the solar magnetic field and the solar wind. So not only did the OAHSPE author "deduced correctly what the effect of solar emmanations on a diffuse spherical structure would be", but the author also "deduced" correctly that there was a solar vortex.

There are typographical errors and omissions in the Oahspe 1882 Edition of Book of Cosmogony and Prophesy Chapter 1, Verses 4 and 5.

The typographical errors and omissions of these
verses were corrected in the Oahspe 1891 Edition by Newbrough and read:

||4.The semi-diameter of the moon's vortex is ten
times the moon's diameter, and the semi-diameter of the earth's vortex is thirty times the earth's diameter, with variations which will be explained
hereafter.
5. The outer rim, forty-two thousand miles broad, of
the moon's vortex, has a revolution axially with the earth once a month.

Which turn's out to be correct.

30 x 7,921 = 237,630, thus making the earth's vortex
475,260 miles broad.
30 x 2,162 = 21,620. thus making the moon's vortex
43,250 miles broad.

Now some may say, okay well 43,250 miles is close
enough to 42,000 miles, so Oahspe is rounding out the figure.

But consider this:

Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy, Chapter 2, 26-29
||26. By observing the new moon, it will be seen
that the light portion thereof describes a larger circle than the dark portion. The bulge of the light side of the moon always points toward the sun. It is an error to say that light comes from the sun and strikes on the moon, and is then reflected on the earth. As previously shown, there is no such thing or substance as light; but that which is called light is a manifestation of vortexian power; also that the c'vortex is comparatively all one light, with a central focus. The reason one side of the moon is dark and one light, is because it has a positive
and negative manifestation of the c'vortexya; for the moon also manufactures its own light.
27. As the moon advances to the next quarter, the
same discrepancy in the two apparent sizes is manifest; and this continues until it is full moon. It is an error to say that dark bodies appear smaller, and light bodies larger, because of absorption, or refraction. The cause is not absorption, or refraction, or reflection, but of
manufacture.
28. Light bodies (so-called) manufacture light of
their own, ever so infinitesimal, which is as an envelope external to themselves. The eye of the observer sees this
as well as the corporeal body, and consequently it appears larger than it really is.
29. The same rule applies in regard to the sun and his photosphere, and to comets, and to all bodies that manifest light. Suitable deduction must be made, in
endeavoring to determine the size of a planet.||

It is more likely that Oahspe's figure is more
accurate than those we currently have from conventional scientific sources, since the above mentioned allowance regarding the moon's light has not been taken into account. Making the diameter of the moon closer to 2,100
miles.

OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY CH.I:2,5,8 says "The earth floateth in the midst of a vortex, the outer extremity of which is somewhat beyond the moon. The outer rim, forty-two thousand miles broad, of the Earth's vortex, the greater diameter of the vortex is east and west, the lesser diameter is north and south...At this age of the comet, it showeth nearly the configuration of it's own vortex; it's tail being the m'vortex'ya. If it appear to the east of the Sun it's tail turneth eastward; if west of the sun, it turneth westward."

From the book EXPLORING THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE by Richard A. Craig copyright 1968 pages 136-137 says "The magnetosphere, beyond about 30 Earth radii, on the side of the Earth away from the sun,...On the side away form the Sun, there is a much more extended region called a 'tail', which may reach out well beyond the moon; although this question is not yet settled...our understanding of the magnetosphere is very limited because only the far-ranging space probes can study it. A vast amount of work remains to be done."

From the book AURORA BOREALIS THE AMAZING NORTHEREN LIGHTS copyright 1979 by S.I. Akasofu page 69 says "Our understanding of the aurora began to improve dramatically about 10 years ago as a result of a very intensive study. Scientist view this phenomena in terms of an electrical discharge [As did OAHSPE in 1881] powered by the magnetosphere generator [The Earth's vortex Oahspe says]. They are now engaged in proving this theory with information gathered by satellites and rockets - INFORMATION UNOBTAINABLE BEFORE THE SPACE AGE." Page 71 of Akasofu's book says "a cavity, shaped like a comet is formed around the earth. It is the Earth's invisible magnetic field. The cavity is called the magnetosphere." On page 72 of Akasofu's book it says "Professor Sydney Chapman, a physicist who, with his colleague, Vincenzo Ferraro, was the FIRST to THEORIZE the formation of the MAGNETOSPHERE in 1931." OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY II:25 says "A complete planetary vortex is a globe, or nearly so, and it's manifested light like a complete magnet."

November 16, 2005: Is Earth in a vortex of space-time?.
Have a look in Oahspe. It said so in 1881

-
Vortex science

www.earthvortex.com

Comet Kohoutek, like most comets, exhibits a similar kind of shape as the cavity called the magnetosphere. This cavity is formed around the earth when the solar wind "blows" in our vicinity.

Increase your traffic with TrafficSwarm

alt="Search Engine Submission and Internet Marketing" width="88" height="31" border="0">

In Akasofu's book it says "some of the magnetic field lines of the solar wind are CONNECTED to a bundle of magnetic field lines of the earth across the boundary of the magnetosphere." OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY III:2 says "The half of the Earth's vortex (for example) which faceth toward the sun is a concave lens to the earth. A similar lens, but far larger, is at the sun-centre: The convex faces of the two lenses are toward each other forever. They are ethereally [invisibly, subatomicly] CONNECTED by solutions of corpor needles linear in position." Scientist in 1979 said the magnetic field lines of the solar [sun] wind are CONNECTED to a bundle of magnetic field lines of the Earth across the magnetosphere. Oahspe in 1881 said the vortexia [magnetic] lens of the Sun is CONNECTED to the vortexian [magnetic] lens of the earth ethereally [invisibly, subatomicly].