12..Science is great; great learning is great; truth is great; but a greater than all is to know how to
be happy. You shall not put me away saying: All the earth is sin. || I will not have it. For if you do not benefit in Jehovih's
Person (that which is seen), how can you attain His Spirit (that which is unseen)? For are the two: His Person and His Spirit,
not the All One? 13. Teach yourself to be happy; and to perfect yourself in the way Jehovih has created you. - Oahspe
Book Of Knowledge Part 2
OAHSPE GOD'S BOOK OF BEN CHAPTER VII: 3. I am the living mathematics;
The Key to understanding anything you read is to take it one word and one sentence at a time. If you come
to a word you don't understand then research the word
until you understand it, then go back and re-read the sentence
again. I have made the word research easier
for you by providing definitions for many strange words in Oahspe and on my website.
Above drawing of the Pendulum of Corporeal
Human Races shows human evolution by cross breeding (mixing) until the divine goal is reached in the Kosmon race which is balanced, strong, and grown up physically and spiritually.
Each succeeding swing of the pendulum is one step closer to
the goal and one swing nearer to balance. Each pendulum swing represents a race of man named in Oahspe and a
step in human evolution. Ghan includes Listians, and Asu and Druk includes Yaks. Pendulum swings: 1st = extremely physical, lacking spiritual. 2nd = extremely spiritual, lacking physical.
7th = not lacking in physical or spiritual developement. 7 represents completion or peak, the 7th era at hand.
The middle or center represents balance between two opposites.
The whole universe is constantly seeking balance between two opposites. Balance is the one word of the Universal Law of Creator
God. Asu-man had to be created first because man was created different from any other species or animal. Asu man was
created without a pre-program or instinct, at zero, and therefore had no (zero, 0.0) ability (genes) for spiritual understanding.
If Asu would have had the genes for spiritual understanding then that would have been a pre-program or instinct like the animals.
So the genetic ability for spiritual understanding had to be added to man by cross breeding with the angels who had it, thus
came the second race of man the I'hins. But the I'hins were lacking physically (which they inherited from their angel parents
who had died in infancy on other physical planets). So the I'hins not being the perfection (completion, balance) of humankind
had to cross breed with the Asuans to gain more physical ability. Although the Druks were physically larger and stronger than
the I'hins, they still had too much beast (Asu) blood (genetics) in them (more than 66.6 %), and too little angel blood in
them (less than 33.3 %) so the druks had to cross breed (mix) with the I'hins to produce the I'huan, the first race that was
physically large and strong, and had spiritual ability. Another swing of the pendulum and one swing nearer to balance and
completion. Even with the racial mixing the I'hins were commanded to keep seperate and not breed with the other races,
this was because it was important to keep them seperate and "pure" to be used as a breeding stock for spiritual
genetics (ability), so racial seperation and race mixing was all part of the divine plan. The dividing line between mixed
Druk and Mongrel is somewhere between half Druk-half I'huan, and half Druk-half Ghan. Pendulum-of-races (2013, Kosmon 165 or 33 x 5).
Above Pendulum of corporeal human races faces. Left colum
from top to botom = Asu, Druk,
Mongrel. Right column from top to bottom = I'hin, I'huan, Ghan. In the
center at botom = Kosmon
Oahspe Book of Osiris, Son of
Jehovih: Chapter XII: 8. On all corporeal worlds, Jehovih hath provided these two seasons for every race He created;
a season for the development of the corporeal senses, and a
season for the development of the spiritual senses. To find the mean between these is to find kosmon, The mean is the average of the numbers: a calculated "central" value of a set of numbers. http://www.mathsisfun.com/definitions/mean.html - OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book CHAPTER I: 21. And as to the
newborn people, they shall become the mightiest of all people in the whole world, because they came out of both darkness and
light. The darkness in them shall battle all darkness;
the light that is in them shall then master over their own darkness.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Each race first appeared
on earth according to Oahspe: Asu - 78,000 years before Kosmon. I'hin - 72,000 years before Kosmon. Druk -
71,000 years before Kosmon. I'huan - 70,000 years before Kosmon. Ghan - 14,000 years before Kosmon. Mongrel
- 8,000 years before Kosmon. Kosmon - about 100 years after Kosmon. Above from pages 160-161 of SEVEN YEARS THAT
CHANGED THE WORLD, 1941-1948 (1940) by Wing Anderson. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^-- Removing OAHSPE's Enigma By Jim Dennon
and Asu side by side with very similar long torso proportion, short neck, profuse body hair, pronounced brow ridge, low
sloping forehead,distance from top of head to where shoulders meet neck to where
bottom part of split between breasts are closest, to the groin are very close to same. These proportions are much different
in Homo erectus and modern humans. John Newbrough's drawing of Asu's legs and arms are much different proportions than Asu's
(perhaps due to stylized exaggeration) but from top of head to groin are very similar.
Ardipithecus ramidus drawing
next to fossil bones next to Asu drawing to same scale with projection lines. Notice the matching projection lines to brow ridges, nostrils, mouth, torso bend, and groin of Ardi
and Asu showing very similar face and torso parts. What is mostly different about the drawing of Ardipithecus
ramidus and Asu is the area outside of the trunk or torso such as the limbs (arms and legs). Much of the fossil arm bones of Ardipithecus ramidus is missing (red ovals).
Asu's legs are not extended so they appear shorter than they were.
12 seconds into the YouTube video above you can seethe legs of a Gibbon
appears very short when sitting and they appear much longer when they are standing,
very similar to the difference between the depiction of Ardipithecus ramidus legs standing and Asu legs sitting (see images
Above: facial drawing of Pithecanthropus erectus compared to facial drawing of Asu the first man of earth
in Oahspe drawn by John Ballou Newbrough. Notice the similarities in neck, facial-head shape-features and hair.
Above: facial drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus compared to facial drawing of Asu the first man of earth in
Oahspe drawn by John Ballou Newbrough. Notice the similarities in neck, facial-head shape-features and hair. Asu had a human (Homo or Neanderthal) type tall nose, not an ape-like nose that Ardipithecus
was drawn with. Erectus fossil was discovered in 1891 ten (10) years after Oahspe on the island of Java (Indonesia) very close to where the continent of Pan was. Ardipithecus ramidus fossil was discovered in 2009 (128) years after
Oahspe in eastern Africa (Ethiopia). One of the big difference between Oahspe and other spiritual books (like the Bible) is the
drawings. Oahspe has a drawing of Asu (Adam) that fits the fossil record
(evidence). Asu is the roots of earth
man's aggression and beast war-like behavior (numbered .666 or 2/3) that is
seen in Chimpanzees:
Some people looking like animals-Apes. Protruding mouths, thin lips, thicker browridges, shape of head, like Australopithecus, Homo erectus, and Neanderthal.
record which is physical evidence, forensics, anthropology. The fossil record is physical forensic evidence of animal-like
(ape-like) people who lived in the past. The answer from Bible believing people about fossils of Homo-erectus and Neanderthal
is that they are deformed humans. Deformity is rare like a mutation. When something is the majority it is not a deformity.
There was a time when the majority of people looked animal or ape-like according to the fossil physical evidence. The
Bible does not explain the animal nature and physical features of early man. The Bible does not account for the origins
of man and the fossil record. All humans today have at least 50% to 60% animal-man DNA in them. The 1st (race) of man
was 100% animal-man, the 2nd (race) of man was 50% animal-man. The 3rd (race) of man was 75% animal-man. The 4th (race)
of man was 62.5% animal-man. Notice how the shape of the head of the Yak below (far right) in Oahspe resembles the skull of
Homo erectus (fossil record).
"Then he told me that the garden of Eden where Adam and Eve lived was found to
be in Ethiopia, "same place where Lucy was found"... (Oh my) So I asked him if he knew what Lucy looks like and he said "No". I sent him across the street
to the National History Museum to see the replica of Lucy's skeleton. He then said that, according to this brilliant neuroscientist
that is famous around the world and is running for President (Ben Carson), the fossils that have been found are actually
fossils of regular humans with deformities. In short, these people are absolutely
ignorant and deniers of Science. I put him against the wall with arguments, and he was really nervous so I let him go." http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/oahspe-when-matings-with-angels-dont-produce-giants
ASU, THE FIRST MAN
(Ardipithecus ramidus the first hominid).
Gibbon Ape, Modern Man, Asu the first Man with aprox. same torso
length to show proportional arm lengths.
Notice that when
the torso length is the same the Gibbon
Ape and Asu Man have about the same arm lengths.
Neoteny in humans
is the slowing or delaying of body development, compared to non-human primates, resulting in features such as a large head,
a flat face, and relatively short arms and legs. Neoteny of the human body is indicated by glabrousness (hairless
body). Neoteny in humans is further
indicated by the limbs and body posture, with the limbs proportionately
short compared to torso length;longer leg than arm length;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans The I'hins had all the highlighted features above and Asu did not. The
I'hins had neoteny features because of the infancy DNA that was passed down from their angelic parents who had died in infancy on other corporeal worlds.
Ardipithecus ramidus was a fruit-eater
(see drawing below by John Ballu Newbrough in Oahspe).
Above Orthographic projection of Ardipithecus face to Asu face showing similarities in facial
design and proportions. Orthographic projection uses parallel lines to compare the shapes of two things. Ardipithecus
and Asu chins align, lips align, eyes align, brow ridges align, and slopes of foreheads align.
Above forensic reconstruction drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus and Asu drawing in Oahspe by
John Ballou Newbrough
both showing 45 degree slope of forehead using Isosceles
Triangle (90, 45, 45).
Notice above when put to same scale, the drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus and drawing of Asu have projection
lines from the brow ridge to brow ridge and nostrils to nostrils and mouth slit to mouth slit that match. Also the following
colored lines match : Yellow line = 45 degree triangular slant of top-side of head. Red line = top of brow
ridge. Green line = shape of top of eye socket and bottom of brow ride. Blue line = bottom of eye socket to nose
ridge. Brown line = shoulder to side of neck.
- "This is the oldest hominid skeleton on Earth,"
said Tim White, University of California, Berkeley, professor of integrative biology and one of the co-directors of the
Middle Awash Project, a team of 70 scientists that reconstructed the skeleton and other fossils found with it. ...the
first hominid to arise after the hominid line that would eventually lead to humans ... "Ardi was not a chimpanzee, but she wasn't human," stressed White, who
directs UC Berkeley's Human Evolution Research Center. "When climbing on all fours, she did not walk on her knuckles,
like a chimp or gorilla, but on her palms. No ape today walks on its palms." White said Ardi, who probably weighed
about 110 pounds, had a brain close to the size of today's chimpanzees — one-fifth that of Homo sapiens — and
a small face. http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2009/10/01_ardiskeleton.shtml
A. ramidus was named
in September 1994. The first fossil found was dated to 4.4 million years ago on the basis of its stratigraphic position
between two volcanic strata: the
basal Gaala Tuff Complex(G.A.T.C.)
and the Daam Aatu Basaltic Tuff (D.A.B.T.).
Carbon-14 decays with a halflife of about 5730 years by
the emission of an electron of energy 0.016 MeV.
The low activity of the carbon-14 limits age determinations to the order of 50,000
years by counting techniques. That can be extended to perhaps 100,000 years by accelerator techniquesfor counting the carbon-14 concentration.
Early or Primitive man 1. Asu = Adam
100% of the Earth, 0% of Heaven. = Ardipithecus ramidus - Australipithecus
= Abel 50% Asu, 50% heaven = Homo floresiensis * * Homo florsiensis is mixed with Homo erectus, but in phenotype I consider
him I'hin just as an African-american is considered black even when mixed with caucasion or american indian. I'hin was not
a "pure" race anyway, the only pure race was A'su the first, all the others are mixed. 3. Original and early
Druks:(Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo ergaster) A. The original Druks = Cain 75% Asu, 25% heaven B. Early
Druk mixture (1/2 mix) = half Ihuan/half Druk = 68.75 Asu, 31.25% heaven The original and early druks were not capable
of everlasting life geneticly. 4. Yak = tallest 87.5% Asu, 12.5% heaven = Sasquatch, Bigfoot
- Other excellent Oahspe scholars have said the druks were Homo neaderthalis also: Augustine Cahill, author
of DARKNESS, DAWN, AND DESTINTY (DRAWN FROM OAHSPE) 1965. Ruth and Vernon, the experts who put together THE OAHSPE STANDARD
EDITION! http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/AncientRacesofMan.html Susan Martinez, Ph.D.(Anthropology) has the original Druks being Homo erectus and the latter Druks being Homo
neanderthals, a half druk/half I'huan cross. Page 307 fig. 9.4 Family Tree of Man, THE LOST HISTORY of the Little People,
2013 _________________________ Modern Man 5. I'huan = 62.5% Asu, 37.5% heaven = Homo
sapiens sapiens Cromagnon (modern man)
6. Listian-Ghan = 56.25% Asu, 43.75% heaven = Modern
man 7. Kosmon = mixture of all the modern races of man = Cosmic man Druk = cross between Asu and Ihin Yak =
cross betweem Asu and Druk I'huan = cross between Druk and I'hin Listian - Ghan = cross between I'huan and I'hin Kosmon = cross between different Listians, Ghans, I'huans, and Mongrels
Latter Druks (Homo neanderthalis): 3C. The latter Druks (1/4 mix) = 3/4 I'huan/1/4 Druk = 65.62 Asu, 34.38%
heaven * The latter Druk (1/4 mix) was capable of eternal life in heaven because they had less than 66.6 % Asu,
and more than 33.3 % heaven, above the genetic threshold for everlasting life. An analogy to the above is the fact that
in America for centuries people were still considered black who had only 1/4 black ancestry.
- Other mixed races of modern man: Origin of the short negritos (Ghan-Druk-I'hin mix): Oahspe Book of Divinity:
Chapter XI: 18. And it came to pass that a fourth race
rose up in the world, and it was mongrel, being
dark and short and less noble. The I'huans were red, and brown, and tall, and majestic; the I'hins small, and
white, and yellow. And Jehovih put these marks upon His peoples that the races might be read in thousands of years. -
Mbuti Pygmies and San people = 90% I'hin + 10% I'huan = 46.5% Angelic, 53.5% Asu..
mark or threshold (.666) 6. Druk
5/8 of the races are above the mark of the Beast, those 5 have beauty, symmetry of features. 8 / 5 = 1.6 (PHI)
the Golden Ratio, Divine Ratio, harmony of the God Apollo (the cycle of the Orian Cheif Apollo).
Golden Ratio proportions of the human body
The following sections of the modern human body are all in phi proportion: finger tip to elbow…wrist
to elbow shoulder line/top of head… head length navel/top of head… shoulder line/top of head navel to knee… knee to end of foot.
The beauties and harmonies of Nature
are an expression of the All-Person, Jehovih. 3/8 of the races are below the mark of the Beast, those 3 races had bent backs,
low foreheads, receeding chins, hanging jaws, disproportionate long arms, clawlike long sharp curved fingernails.
8 corporeal races mentioned in Oahspe, 5 have
symmetry of features, 3 don't = 3, 5, and 8 are fibonacci numbers, 8 divided by 5 = 1.6 = golden ratio of symmetry,
Oahspe Book of Sapah, OSIRIS, 58 Since the submersion of Pan to the present cycle
of Kosmon, there have been 8 cycles to get to the Kosmon race (the 8th race) After the cycle of Apollo most of mankind
achieved symmetry, harmony of features. 5 of the 8 cycles were after the cycle of Apollo. 1. Aph = 25000 years before
Kosmon 2. Sue = 21400 years before Kosmon 3. Apollo, the 1st = 18200 years B.K --------------Symmetry, beauty,
harmony = 8/5 cycles = 1.6 Golden ratio 4. Thor, the 1st = 15400 years B.K. 5. Osiris, the 1st = 12200 years B.K. 6. Fragapatti = 8900 years before Kosmon 7. Cpenta-Armij = 5800 years before Kosmon 8. Arc of Bon = 3400 years
B.K. to Kosmon --------------Kosmon, present cycle 99.9% symmetry, harmony
Percent human's with
> 1/3 Angelic Eve blood [everlasting life] Arc, Cycle, Etherean 1-16, Sethantes-Neph____ 1% = 79000-24000
years B.K. 17, Aph_________________ 54% = 25000 years before Kosmon 18, Sue_________________ 62% = 21400 years before
Kosmon 19, Apollo______________ 72% = 18200 years B.K 20, Thor________________ 85% = 15400 years B.K. 21, Osiris______________
87% = 12200 years B.K. 22, Fragapatti__________ 90% = 8900 years before Kosmon 23, Cpenta-armij________ 95% = 5800
years before Kosmon 24, Lika,_______________ 99% = 3400 years B.K. to Kosmon 25, Ouranothen__________ 100% [99.99%]
= Present Kosmon http://www.angelfire.com/ia/faithist/page13.jpg
Page 87 of DARKNESS, DAWN, AND DESTINY, 1965 by Augustine
Cahill says "I have frequently remarked in the course of this study that the I'hins were originally a fair race, descended
on the one side however from Adam [Asu], a black race. The pigmentation of subsequent tribes was at first proportional to
the degree of I'hin or Adamite blood [genetics], but in course of time various permutations manifested. It may be advisable
at this juncture to emphasize that Oahspe clearly and repeatedly states that the day of race or colour discrimination is now past. The I'hins and the Ghans were required
to keep their blood pure for spiritual reasons, but today the Adamites [Asu], the cavemen [Druks, Yaks], and the I'hins are
all extinct. There is no longer any necessary spiritual virtue
in the accident of a fair complexion. The lower caste Hindus [of India] for instance have more I'hin blood in
them than many of the white races." - The mathematics
of human genetics and evolutionary change: - Genetic ratios (earthly to spiritual) of races in Oahspe: Early man: 1. Asu = Adam 100% of the Earth, 0% of Heaven. = 100 / .00001 = 10,000,000 : 1
converted to time = 10 million years split between humans and chimps. 2. I'hin = 50% Asu, 50% angelic = 50 / 50 = 1:1
= complete quantity (not quality) 3. Druks = 75% Asu, 25% angelic = 75 / 25 = 3:1 4. Yak = 87.5% Asu, 12.5% angelic
= 87.5 / 12.5 = 7:1 Genetic threshold = 66.66 Beast, 33.33 angelic = 2:1 and above is imbalance Below 2:1 genetic
ratio is everlasting life, golden ratio and balance Modern man: 5. I'huan = 62.5% Asu, 37.5% angel = 1.66:1 = golden
ratio, 5/3 fibonacci numbers. 6. Mongrels = 65.625 Asu, 34.375 angelic = 1.90:1 7. Listian-Ghan = 56.25% Asu, 43.75%
angelic = 1.28:1 8. Kosmon = mixture of all the modern races of man = 1.22:1 Everlasting life (spiritual ability)
genetics = LESS THAN 66.6 % (a'ji) Asu (beast), and MORE THAN 33.3% (dan) Angel (Heaven) = less than a harmonic multiple (double)
While the genetic difference between individual
humans today is minuscule – about 0.1%, on average – study of the same aspects of the chimpanzee genome indicates
a difference of about 1.2%. The bonobo (Pan paniscus), which is the close cousin of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), differs
from humans to the same degree. The DNA difference with gorillas, another of the African apes, is about 1.6%. Most importantly,
chimpanzees, bonobos, and humans all show this same amount of difference from gorillas. A difference of 3.1% distinguishes
us and the African apes from the Asian great ape, the orangutan. How do the monkeys stack up? All of the great apes
and humans differ from rhesus monkeys, for example, by about 7% in their DNA. Geneticists have come up with a variety
of ways of calculating the percentages, which give different impressions about how similar chimpanzees and humans are. Site Last Updated: 2013-12-24 http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics -
Our closest animal relatives are the great apes: chimpanzees, orangutans and gorillas.
About 98% of the DNA in your genes is exactly the same as in chimpanzees, making you as closely related to a chimp as horses
are to zebras. www.sciencemuseum.org.uk › ... › Where did we come from?
10,000,000 converted to time = 10 million years split between
humans and chimps. Rather than write a ratio of infinite:1, I gave Asu a measurable genetic progress
(change, evolution) equal to 100 / the most number of places, whole numbers and decimal of the other races of man = 5 for
Mongrels 65.625, 34.375) = .00001. Which is equivalent to the smallest possible progress or change ability of an Ape-man or
Asu. If converted to time 100 / .00001 = 10 million years for Asu to evolve into Homo sapiens sapiens. This 10,000,000
number matches a DNA study: DNA study maps human-chimp split - NEW YORK — One of the most detailed
comparisons yet of human and chimp DNA shows... Previous genetic research has shown that chimpanzees and humans
are sister species, having split off from a common ancestor about 7 million years ago. The new study goes farther by looking at approximately 800 times more DNA than earlier efforts. The researchers, from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, propose that humans and chimpanzees first split up
about 10 million years ago. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/genetics/2006-05-17-human-chimp-split_x.htm
OAHSPE. 1. AFTER the creation
of man, the Creator, Jehovih, said unto him: That thou shalt know thou art the work of My hand, I have given thee capacity
for knowledge, power and dominion. This was the first era. 2. But man was helpless, crawling on his belly, and he understood
not the voice of the Almighty. And Jehovih called his angels,
who were older than the earth, and he said unto them: Go ye, raise man upright, and teach him to understand. 3. And the angels of heaven descended to the earth and raised man upright. And man wandered about on the
earth. This was the second era. - Book of Sethantes, Son of Jehovih: Chapter II: 29. And the record of the
Great Serpent showed the firmament of Tem'yi in the third circuit of c'vork'um and dan'ha twenty-four. 2 18:2 This would
make the age of the earth at that time, 9,470,500 years. This would make the age of the earth at that time 13,172,000
years old.— [Ed. This was during the time of Sethantes which was about 73,000 years ago. 4.7
x 2 = 9.4 million + 72,000 = 9,472,000 = 2 circuits + 72,000 years = 3rd Circuit and 72,000 years. By my calculations
the age of the earth at that time was 9,472,000 years. + 73,000 years = 9,545,000 According to Oahspe the age of the
earth today is 9,545,000 years old - Earth Man's
DNA goes back over 10 million or 13 million years, because of the angels (men) who had died in infancy or fetal
on other corporeal planets and some of those angels (men) where older than the earth. This agrees with the age of the first direct ancestors of man according to molecular biology
Mathematical formula for hominid races (sub-species) ancestors
of man to evolve (change) into fully modern man (Homo sapiens). 3.33 = threshold for everlasting life (dan, 33) 6.66 = number of the Beast, 666, animal-man -
Man (Asu) was created at zero (0.00001) BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER XIII: 26. Thyself I gave ...the zero of thy entity Oahspe SECOND BOOK OF LORDS CHAPTER
I: 18. The Lord said: ...man was created blank;
Asuans: 10,000,000 x 1.00 = 10,000,000 10,000,000 x 0.00001 = 100 10,000,000 - 100 = 9,999,900 9,999,900
/ 1,000,000 = 9.9999 9.9999 - 3.3333 = 6.666 = 6,666,666 years for Asu to evolve into Homo sapiens -
For Yaks: 10,000,000 x .875 = 8,750,000 10,000,000 x .125 = 1,250,00 8,750,00 - 1,250,000 = 7,500,000
years 7,500,000 / 1,000,000 = 7.5 7.5 - 3.33 = 4.17 = 4,170,000 years for Yak to evolve into Homo sapiens -
For Druks: 10,000,000 x .75 = 7,500,000 10,000,000 x .25 = 2,500,000 7,500,000 - 2,500,000 = 5,000,000
years 5,000,000 / 1,000,000 = 5 5.0 - 3.33 = 1.67 = 1,670,000 years for Druk to evolve into Homo sapiens -
For I'huans: 10,000,000 x .625 = 6,250,000 10,000,000 x .375 = 3,750,000 6,250,000 - 3,750,000 = 2,500,000
years 2,500,000 / 1,000,000 = 2.5 2.5 - 3.33 = negative years for I'huan to evolve into Homo sapiens - According
to Oahspe the evolution of the ape-man to fully modern man never happened. Asu (Adam) was created and existed only 79,000
years ago and became extinct in 8,000 years and it was the intervention (mixing) of the angel dna that caused and sped up
the evolution (progress, change) of man. .00001 is a number that is much too small for any significant change to occur within
Asu in one life time, to achieve the smallest number for spiritual understanding and ability (33.3 % genetics).
- According to Oahspe mankind was half-way in the Eoptian age of man on earth at the time of the great pyramid
of Egypt, from the time of the origin of I'hin = 72,000 + 72000 = 144,000 years (Eoptian Age), not enough time for Asu,
Yaks, or Druks to evolve into Modern man (I'huans or Ghans). This is probably the case on the other corporeal worlds that
have human life, so that in all the universe there is no evolution (except by cross-breeding or mixing) of ape-man to fully
modern man. It woud take 1.67 (for Druks) to 6.66 (for Asu) million years or never, and mankind is not on a corporeal
world long enough for that to happend before he becomes extinct. - OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book Chapter IV:21: "For I foresaw these times, and provided angels to go in advance, to show, first, the evolution of the races
of men from out of the lowest darkness; and, second, that the cause of the evolution came from the
Great Spirit, and was directed unto righteousness; but had not been so, but for the Lord, your God."
Evolution does not happend from one species to another species, but it does happend
from within a species, from one kind of man to another kind of man (not from animal to man). During the cycle of Apollo
the physical form of man changed, evolved. The cause of the evolution was the thoughts of the mother manifesting in the body
of the children. The cause of the evolution of man is NOT environment, it is the spirit, thought, this is why whites wouldn't
turn into blacks, or blacks turn into whites merely by living in a certain country of environment. OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY
AND PROPHECY V: 12. And all of them propogated after their own kind, and do so to this day. And though the blacks might
live for thousands of generations with themselves only, in any country in the world, they would never become whites. And the
same rule applieth to whites and browns, and all the races of man. - DARKNESS, DAWN AND DESTINY (drawn from Oahspe)
by Augustine Cahill, page 82 says "Apollo's task envisaged a physical transformation of the lumbering unlovely Stone
Age savage into a handsome, nimble athlete, or a beautifully moulded graceful woman. Apollo's work was the foundation of harmony,
symmetry, and music in human life. How was such a task, which evolutionary theorists would ascribe to the operation of
the blind and chance processes of 'natural selection' over countless generations, actually accomplished in a comparatively
short period of time--as the prehistoric remains prove that it was? It was done by angelic control, by the inspiration
for instance of pregnant woman, who were caused to DREAM by night of handsome children, and who were obsessed into a passionate
desire for beauty in their offspring through the worship of the IMAGES OF APOLLO by day. THE POWER OF THEIR THOUGHT processes
then CREATIVELY FORMED the soul of the child in the womb, helping the coming soul to SHAPE the coming body. Let us not
underestimate THE POWER of the mother's THOUGHT..." - Oahspe Book of Apollo, Son of Jehovih: Chapter XIV: 1. JEHOVIH spake from the light of the throne of God, saying: Hear the words of your Creator, O ye Counselors of heaven. 3. But My physicians are tired; My nurses are tired; My teachers are tired. Be wise, O My Sons and Daughters. Who hath reformed
a beggar by giving to him? What physician preventeth sickness by healing? 4. They bring forth in deformity on the earth,
and ye must cure them in heaven. They squat on their haunches on earth, and they squat the same way in heaven, and ye must
cure them. 5. Go ye to the root of the matter, O My beloved. Send ye down to the kingdoms of My Lords, and say to them:
Thus saith Jehovih: Follow them, O My Lords! Double the number of ashars, double the loo'is; leave no young man alone; leave
no young woman alone. Keep over them day and night; give them visions and dreams of Apollo. For I am concerted in heaven and
on earth to re-mold the forms of the earth-born. 6. Jehovih said: Hear your Creator, O Gau! Make seven more plateaux
for the second resurrection. Out of the idolatry of My Son, Apollo, will I beautify the inhabitants of the earth. And the
cast and mold of men and of women shall become a great power. 13. So Jehovih changed the forms of the earth-born; but
they became worshippers of Apollo; accrediting to one another Jehovih's perfection in them, according to the form and figure
of the flesh. And because of the idolatry of the women for Apollo,
their children were born of good flesh, and shapely; so that, in four hundred years, the hair on their heads grew long and
straight, and men began to have beards. Neither considered any young man any virtue in a young woman so important as her form;
nor did young women value any virtue in man so great as a well-molded form. 14. And when mortals died, and their spirits entered the first resurrection, half the labor of the asaphs, the receiving angels, was accomplished. - OAHSPE First Book of the First Lords chapter II:
"19. The Druks inquired, saying: How shall a man live forever? Behold, ye that believe also die! 20. The I'hins answered,
saying: As the voice of the Lord is unseen but potent, so is there a spirit in man unseen and potent, which shall never die,
but ascend to heaven to habitations prepared by the Lord. 21. And many of the Druks pondered on these things, and THEIR THOUGHTS
QUICKENED their souls within them, so that they brought forth heirs unto eternal salvation." - OAHSPE First
Book of the First Lords chapter II: "19 speaks about the Druks who were born genetically below the ability to understand
spiritually QUICKENING their evolutionary development
by THEIR THOUGHTS (pondering on the things they learned from anatomically modern man) so that they brought forth heirs unto
eternal salvation. So what may have taken the Druks 1.67 million years to develope was QUICKENED to they brought forth heirs unto eternal salvation in 2 or 3 generations. Heir: a person who inherits or has a right of inheritance in the property of another following the latter's death. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/heir So by definition of heir the offspring of the Druks inherited the new ability after the death of the Druks who QUICKENED
their souls within by pondering on the things they learned from the I'hins, so it would have taken at least 2 or 3 generations
for the effect to manifest in the heirs (a grandchild could be a heir). This means that 1,670,000 years of evolution
for Druks to evolve into modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens) was sped up to just a 100 or 200 years of evolution (Ground People,
or Druks lived to be 200 years old). 10,000,000 x .75 = 7,500,000 10,000,000 x .25 = 2,500,000 7,500,000 -
2,500,000 = 5,000,000 years 5,000,000 / 1,000,000 = 5 5.0 - 3.33 = 1.67 = 1,670,000 years for Druks to evolve into
Homo sapiens The REALIZATION of the Druks sped up (QUICKENED)
their evolution and changed their DNA. - Same cycles on other corporeal worlds is evidence for same human development on other corporeal worlds: Oahspe Book of Es, Daughter of Jehovih: Chapter VIII: Litabakathrava, Orion chief of 240,000 years said: 15. ..I
have seen many corporeal worlds arrive at the kosmon era.
- Same cycles on other planets with intelligent life: OAHSPE: Book of Es CHAPTER VII: 18. On all the planetary worlds it is ever the same; certain four
false Gods rise up to possess the corporeal worlds and her heavens. - Race number 5 is the
I'huan race , 5 is a fibonacci number, 5 divided by the previous and next fibonacci numbers = 1.66 (5/3) golden ratio, the
genetic ratio of the I'huan. 8/5 = 1.6 golden ratio. The I'huan was the first modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens) race and the
first race to have spiritual everlasting ability WITH great physical strength AND tallness. 1.6 = 1 / .6 = 1.66
= balance = symmetry of features and characteristics = golden
ratio. - In Oahspe the first anatomically modern humans
were the I'hins. The I'hins of Ham (Africa) had the most diversity (they were of all colors, white, yellow, red, brown,
and black) whereas elsewhere the I'hins were white and yellow. OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book Chapter III: 4. Of
all colors (black, white, yellow, copper, red and brown) were the tribes of Ham; nevertheless, they were I'hins (Faithists),
having flat nails and short arms, and of such as desired to acquire knowledge.
- Current genetic research have demonstrated that humans
on the African continent are the most genetically diverse. There is more human genetic diversity in Africa than anywhere
else on Earth. Jump up ^ Jorde, L.; Watkins, W; Bamshad, M; Dixon, M; Ricker, C.; Seielstad, M.; Batzer, M. (2000). "The
distribution of human genetic diversity: a comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y-chromosome data". American Journal
of Human Genetics 66 (3): 979–988. doi:10.1086/302825. PMC 1288178. PMID 10712212. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human - "Ardi"(Ardipithecus ramidus), discovered in 2009, is considered the oldest human ancestor and to date the closest resembling the drawing
of Asu man in Oahspe. Ardipithecus ramidus was discovered 128 years after Oahspe. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091001-oldest-human-skeleton-ardi-missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html
- John Ballou Newbrough in 1881 drew a picture of the oldest human ancestor next to
a body of water, such as a river or stream. Newbrough also drew trees next to the bank and in the distant backgound looks
like a savannah grassland (low vegetation). Recent scientific
findings suggest Newbrough's inspired drawings and writings about the oldest human ancestor is accurate. - Archaeology & Fossils December 26, 2011 Couple
finds evidence indicating earliest humans lived by rivers
and streams Husband and wife team Royhan and Nahid Gani have been studying the sediments surrounding the place where Ardipithecus ramidus, aka, "Ardi," was found
in Ethiopia, and have, as they describe in their paper published in
Nature Communications, found that most of the evidence in the area points to a group of people that lived near a very
large river. Ardi is believed to have lived some four and half million years ago in what is now Aramis,
a hot and dry part of Ethiopia, but until now, no serious study had been done on the dirt in which the skeletal remains were
found. After doing so, the Gani’s discovered that the dirt was
actually layers of sandstone that appear most likely to have been the result of an ancient stream overflowing it’s banks
periodically, leaving behind layers of sand. Branching out, the
team discovered that the sediments indicated that such a stream was actually a river, likely twenty six feet deep and over
twelve hundred feet wide. Next they turned their attention to plant material that had been preserved in the sandstone,
measuring their isotopes, and found that the material had come from grassy plants, suggesting a savannah type environment.
But once again, widening their area of study, they also found that there were wide changes in the types of plant material
in the area. This caused them to surmise that there were patches of
forests near the rivers and streams. Based on these two pieces of information, the team suggests that it appears
Ardi, who many researchers believe is our oldest found ancestor,
lived in a savannah, near fresh flowing water. Some suggest that such an environment would be consistent with
learning to walk upright to see over the tall grasses. Our finding suggests that, in contrast to a woodland habitat far from a river, Ar. ramidus lived in a river-margin forest
in an otherwise savanna (wooded grassland) landscape at Aramis, Ethiopia. http://phys.org/news/2011-12-couple-evidence-indicating-earliest-humans.html These data are interpreted to indicate the presence of major
rivers and associated mixed vegetations (grasses and trees) in adjacent floodplains. Our finding suggests that, in
contrast to a woodland habitat far from a river, Ar. ramidus lived
in a river-margin forest in an otherwise savanna (wooded grassland) landscape at Aramis, Ethiopia. Correct interpretation of habitat of Ar. ramidus is crucial for proper assessment
of causes and mechanisms of early hominin evolution ... http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v2/n12/full/ncomms1610.html
Oahspe Book of Sethantes, Son of Jehovih: Chapter X: 3. The Lord said: On our journey
let us run through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for
it is here that both asu and men dwell. And so they journeyed, surveying
the earth as they sailed above. The country was mostly barren, not supporting man nor beast. 4. But by the river sides man dwelt, burrowing in the ground to avoid the
heat by day and the cold by night. "through the
valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that..asu...dwell" - Oahspe 1992–1993...discovered the first A. ramidus fossils—seventeen
fragments including skull, mandible, teeth and arm bones—from the Afar Depression in the Middle Awash river valley of Ethiopia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ardipithecus
ASU, THE FIRST MAN ------------- Ardipithecus ramidus (Asu-like) above
Ardipithecus ramiduswith his long arms, large hands, short legs, small sloping forehead, short
neck, short frizzy hair, very similar chest, very similar lower torso with a slight curve on the side, round extended or bloated
belly, and arboreal (trees) environment resembles the Asu drawing
in Oahspe of the first race of man. Asu may have had some variations with features in common with Ardipithecus, Australopithecus,
Homo habilis, and Homo erectus. At the time Oahspe was written in 1881 the first early man fossils found were of Homo
neanderthalis in 1856 and they did not resemble the Asu drawing in Oahspe closely like Ardipithecus
Asu Man A means without (like a-moral), Su means spirit. Without spirit means without spiritual understanding.
Without spirit also means without the spiritual genetics for everlasting life. - In India, the Veddic word asu (later
changed to "Adam" in Persian) meant "without spirit" or "earth-born" (aboriginal). This
is seen also in Hebrew, where adam means "red earth", and in meshe'adam, the Azerbaijani Yeti or Bigfoot, the most
animal-like version of man. - THE LOST HISTORY of the LITTLE PEOPLE (2013) by Susan B. Martinez, PhD (in Anthropology).
Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of man) 1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man was of the dust of the earth,
the second man from heaven. - Religious and spiritual concepts, Spiritual understanding of the ancestors of modern
man: Religious behaviour is thought to have emerged by the Upper Paleolithic, before
30,000 years ago at the latest,...coinciding with the first appearance of Homo neanderthalensis and Homo
sapiens. There are suggestions for the first appearance of religious or spiritual experience
in the Lower Paleolithic (significantly earlier than...pre-Homo sapiens), but these remain controversial and have limited
support. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleolithic_religion There is no evidence of spiritual concepts of pre-Homo sapiens man (Homo heidelbergensis, Homo ergaster,
Homo-erectus, Astralopithecus, Ardipithecus Ramidus). This agrees with Oahspe saying the Druks, Yaks, and Asuans
were born not capable of spiritual understanding (no spiritual or religious concepts like a beast). These (the Druks, Yaks, Asuans) were the races and sub-species of primate-man that were geneticly below the mark of
the beast. - The Hominidae; also known as great apes[notes 1]) form a taxonomic family of primates, including
four extant genera: chimpanzees and bonobos (Pan);[notes 2] gorillas (Gorilla); humans (Homo); and orangutans
(Pongo). The term "hominid" is also used in the more restricted sense as hominins or "humans and relatives
of humans closer than chimpanzees". In this usage, all hominid species other than Homo sapiens are extinct. A number
of known extinct genera are grouped with humans in the Homininae subfamily, others with orangutans in the Ponginae subfamily. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae
What apes and monkeys can teach us about the roots (Asu, the Beast) of human aggression.
Bigfoot, also known as sasquatch, is the name given to an ape-like creature
that some people believe inhabits forests, mainly in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Bigfoot is usually described
as a large, hairy, bipedal humanoid. The term sasquatch is an anglicized derivative of the Halkomelem word sásq’ets. Most scientists discount the existence of Bigfoot and consider it to be a combination of folklore, misidentification, and
hoax, rather than a living animal, because of the lack of physical evidence and the large numbers of creatures that would
be necessary to maintain a breeding population. A few scientists, such as Jane Goodall, Grover Krantz, and Jeffrey
Meldrum, have expressed interest and some measure of belief in the creature. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigfoot
<--Notice profile of Yak has flatter nose and face than the short I'hin and the tall
I'huan (modern man), larger jaws, and top of head with sagittal keel. ---------------------------------------------
The Yak that is pictured in Oahspe as compared to the I'huan (Modern Man, 6 feet tall, 200 pounds, foot 11 inches
long) has these measured/estimated statistics:
Foot = 15 1/2 inches long, flat with no arch.
Chest = 2 x thickness of modern man
Height = 8 feet 5 inches tall (full length)
Weight = 563 to 715 lbs lean and muscular, 800 to 900 lbs stocky.
or walk = with a deep bend in leg/knee
Posture = upright but curved, stooped or bent over
Arms = much longer than modern man's
Color = brown and black, grey or white
with old age
Strength = hand grip could break a horse's leg
Dwelling = ground, burrow, cave
Clothes = none, went naked
Body hair = more than modern man due to not cutting hair, no clothes, and exposure to cold. Hair on top of head is
short, does not grow long.
The above description is very similar to a Bigfoot or Sasquatch
- Anatomy of the Sasquatch Foot By Grover S. Krantz Many plaster casts and photographs of footprints
have been examined in detail which were reportedly made by a species of bipedal primate, the sasquatch or bigfoot. They prove
not to be simply enlarged human footprints but show several peculiarities. These include flat arches, a double ball, and enlarged
heels. Examination of leverage mechanics of the human foot indicates that with excessive body weight certain modifications
would be advantageous. The expected modifications are the same as those seen in the reputed sasquatch footprints. Within
the last century, several hundred people have reported sightings of gigantic man-like animals in the forests and mountains
of the Pacific Northwest. Hundreds more have seen the huge footprints left by these hairy creatures. Possibly ten times as
many people have seen these giant primates and their tracks without reporting anything to newsmen or law officers for fear
of ridicule. The animal in question is commonly called sasquatch — based on one Indian name for it — or "bigfoot"
for obvious reasons. If this animal really exists, it would probably be man's closest living relative and a member
of the zoological family Hominidae. It is not human, however, in any sense of the word; all reports agree on its
lack of language, artifacts, and social organization. There are a number of reasons to believe at least certain sasquatch
tracks could not have been made by hoaxers. Their obscure locations would mean that perhaps a hundred times as many tracks
were laid as have been discovered. Lengths of stride and obstacles stepped over often surpass anything a man can do. Depths
of imprints would require a hoaxer to carry many hundreds of pounds of extra weight, thus making the walking accomplishments
even more impossible. Independent toe movements as noticed in some tracks would require a special device to accomplish. To all these must now be added the fact that our supposed hoaxer is an expert on human anatomy with a very inventive mind.
He was able to create from nothing all the details of how a foot might be redesigned to support a body weight several times
that of a man. And he has continued to plant these tracks over more than a lifetime, always showing only vague hints of these
anatomical peculiarities. These include great width of heel, a double ball, and a straighter row of similarly sized toes.
Many sasquatch prints show what is called a double ball at the base of the big toe. No matter how incredible it may
seem that the sasquatch exists and has remained uncaught, it is even more incredible to believe in all the attributes of the
hypothetical human track-maker. As Sherlock Holmes put it, "... when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains,
however improbable, must be the truth." Even if none of the hundreds of sightings had ever occurred, we would still be
forced to conclude that a giant bipedal primate does indeed inhabit the forests of the Pacific Northwest. http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/91-anatomy-of-the-sasquatch-foot
Researchers Claim To Have Sequenced Bigfoot DNA.
December 1, 2012
A genetic researcher is saying that
Bigfoot DNA tests prove that the hairy creature really does exist...five years on their study of purported
Bigfoot hair...researchers say their DNA sequencing suggests the animal is a human relative that developed
about 15,000 years ago as a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens with an unknown primate species..."The
genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA
is a novel, unknown hominin related to Homo sapiens and other primate species.
data indicate that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of males of an unknown
hominin species crossing with female Homo sapiens."..."The male progenitor that contributed the unknown
sequence to this hybrid is unique as its DNA is more distantly removed from humans than other recently discovered
"Sasquatch nuclear DNA is incredibly novel and not at all what we
had expected. While it has human nuclear DNA within its genome, there are also distinctly non-human, non-archaic hominin,
and non-ape sequences. We describe it as a mosaic of human and novel non-human sequence."...
In OAHSPE SYNOPSIS OF SIXTEEN CYCLES CHAPTER 1 verses 22,27 it describes males
of an unknown hominin species (Yaks - Ground People) crossing with female Humans (I'hins) 24,000
"22. ...there were ground people, with long
arms, who were large...The ground people were brown and black, and they lived
to be two hundred, and even four hundred years old...they laid hold of the I'hin
women when they went into the fields, and forced them, and thus brought
forth again the I'huan race...
The DNA physical evidence supports what Oahspe
says about the existence (or former existence) of Druks/Yaks/monstrosities betwixt man and beast/Asuans and non human/non
ape male Yaks/Druks mating with female humans tens of thousands of years ago (15 to 24 thousand years ago). The female humans
were attacked and raped by man-beasts in the fields (country, rural area) when they left the city (urban area) or village. - Scientists have discovered
that about one in thirteen people have flexible ape-like feet. A team
studied the feet of 398 visitors to the Boston Museum of Science. This
is known as a mid-tarsal break and is similar to what the Boston team identified in some of their participants. This makes the middle part of the foot bend more easily as the subject pushes off
to propel themselves on to their next step. Dr DeSilva told BBC News
how we might be able to observe whether we have this flexibility: "The best way to see this is if you're walking on the
beach and leaving footprints, the middle portion of your footprint would have a big ridge that might show your foot is actually
folding in that area." The bone structure of a two-million-year
old fossil human relative, Australopithecus sediba, suggests it also had this mobility. http://bigfootresearch.blogspot.com/2013/06/scientists-say-1-in-13-people-have.html One in thirteen people = 7.69 % of people have flexible ape-like feet. What
percent of people have a midtarsal break and a 15 1/2 inches long foot like the Yak drawn by John Ballou Newbrough? If
only 7.69 % of average foot sized people have a midtarsal break, then applying that same ratio of one in thirteen to the small
percent of the population that have 15 1/2 inches long feet and weigh over 480 pounds, that would make an extremely small
population of people.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/yak. “If u listen closer u can hear 1 say Oh my God and WTF.... mimicking the last words
of missing victims”."it’s starts at 1:40 listen close" on Missing 411 Bigfoot (sierra camp sounds). "Quite
a few witnesses who've heard Bigfoot 'talking' have said the closest thing it sounds like is Japanese." or Pan language (Ja-pan remnant of Pan, mimicking or speaking Pan
language). "The Druks inquired, saying : How shall a man live forever ? Behold, ye that believe also
die". - Oahspe First Book of the First Lords Chapter II:19. Perhaps a Yak-Druk mixture could speak. “It’s
actually sounds like a couple guys recreating
old Chinese martial arts movies”. “It
sounds like Japanese mixed with pug”. “The second sound is interesting because it sounds like it's mimicking
human sounds, perhaps from observing people that come through the forest. “ Japanese came out of Chinese. The first branch off the Pan (Panic) trunk (one) on the THE TREE OF LANGUAGE
is Chine (Two or Chinese) which is the closest of the modern languages to The original Pan language. http://web.archive.org/web/20140413183318im_/http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/7187/plate63pg610.jpg
^-- Removing OAHSPE's Enigma By Jim Dennon Are the Yaks, and Yak hybrids extinct, or are they endangered
sub-species?? Are there any non Homo sapiens non Ape Hominidae still alive on earth?
Starting at the 10:36 mark of the video above it talks about Portlock, Alaska. Portlock was supposidly
closed down when a bigfoot terrorized that cannery village. Moose tracks intermingled with large man-like footprints. Giant
manlike tracks, 18 inches reported closing in on moose tracks and signs of a struggle. Villagers in southwest Alaska claimed
to have seen a giant, hair-covered creature roaming the woods and tundra.
Compare the normal foot with arch and the flat foot with no arch (below) to the
above drawings/pictures of a I'huan (modern man) and Yak (Bigfoot or
<--Notice the arch on top of the foot of the I'huan, and no arch on top of the
foot of the Yak. The Yak shows a groove midway on the bottom of the foot and enlarged heels.
The I'huan does not show a midway groove (mid-tarsal break) on the bottom
Above is I'huan (modern man) foot (on left) and Yak foot on right. Lines point to parts of the Yak
(no arch on top of foot), midway groove (mid-tarsal break) on bottom
of foot, and enlarged heels.
Above arrow points to arched instep of human (I'huan-Homo sapiens sapiens) foot.
"The instep or longitudinal arch of the
foot is not there"
The first peculiarity in these giant
footprints is that they are quite flat.
The instep or longitudinal
arch of the foot is not there. In man this arch is maintained
by ligaments and by the muscular pull on tendons. Given 500 pounds
or more of body
weight, these structures would not have sufficient increased strength and the arch
Above size and body comparison between 3 primates, a modern man, a Gorilla, and a man-beast (Bigfoot or
Sasquatch), Notice the Bigfoot is 2 feet taller than the modern man. The Bigfoot's arms are longer than his legs.
The modern man's arms are shorter than his legs. The Bigfoot's chest is twice as wide as the modern man. The Bigfoot's abdomen
is smaller than his chest. The Gorilla's abdomen is larger than his chest. Are Oahspe's Yaks the same as a Bigfoot or Sasquatch?
The Yak in Oahspe is 2 feet taller than modern man (I'huan) and the arms of the Yak are longer than his legs. The Yak's chest
is twice as wide as a modern man. The Yak's abdomen is smaller than his chest just like the description of a Bigfoot or Sasquatch.
Do Yaks still exist? Oahspe speaks of "monstrosities betwixt man and beast". Oahspe says "And the monstrosities, and the Yaks, and the druks, died off,
tens of millions of them. And even yet they were not extinct". OAHSPE: First Book of the First Lords.
modern Bigfoot, Sasquatch, would probably be a cross
between Yaks-Druks and half I'huans, and be very tall and large wild man. Genetically that would be
quarter 2, quarter 3, and half 5 (see top of this page, Evolutionary scale of humans) = 3.75 (below the mark of the Beast
and not capable of spiritual understanding or everlasting life) or a cross between Yaks-I'huans and half Druks, a quarter
2, a quarter 5, and half 3 = 3.25.
Is Bigfoot or Sasquatch in the words of Oahspe a Sar'gis or Sargis? Is Bigfoot a materialized spirit, or a angel (spirit-man) that can take on the semblance of mortal forms?
- Hairy Bigfoot, Sasquatch Although humans appear hairless compared
to other primates, with notable hair growth occurring chiefly on the top of the head, underarms and pubic area, the
average human has more hair follicles on his or her body than the average chimpanzee. The main distinction is that
human hairs are shorter, finer, and less heavily pigmented than the average chimpanzee's, thus making them harder
to see. 75.Jump up ^ Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Way by Nicholas Wade, New York Times, August 19, 2003. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
Above left is a photo of a hairy modern man (ghan). Above right is artwork of a Bigfoot-Sasquatch looking
like a hairy Yak-man of Oahspe.
Above on left is facial reconstruction art of Homo
heidelbergensis a druk who's fossils have been found in Southern Africa, East Africa and Europe. The skulls of heidelbergensis share features with both Homo erectus and anatomically modern Homo
sapiens. Highest facial recognitionto Homo heidelbergensis on http://www.pictriev.com/ is Chad Michael Murray (English, Irish, Polish, German, Swiss-German) 84%.
Above are close-up enlarged drawing of Asu
man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe, and comparison to modern human grip (top) and Orangutan ape grip of tree branch.
The Asu hand and grip more closely resembles that of an Orangutan
of Borneo (near where the continent of Pan was broke off in the southwest Pacific Ocean) than that of a modern human. Orangutans are intelligent and generally
peaceful vegetarians. Most of the time, they live solitary lives quietly browsing fruits and leaves high up
in trees. http://anthro.palomar.edu/primate/prim_7.htm - Science. 1927 May 20;65(1690):481-8. RECENT DISCOVERIES RELATING TO THE ORIGIN AND ANTIQUITY OF MAN. evidence of anatomy and morphology... The brachiating hand of the ape was used as a hook, apes do not grasp a branch with
the fingers and thumb but hook the whole hand over the branch, as trapeze workers do to-day-and the
thumb was therefore a grave danger...arboreal ancestors... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17806528
Palmer grasp reflex = a response
that was once essential for ape infants in arboreal life (grabbing
and hanging from tree branches).
Palmar - palm of the hand grasp reflex.
The vestigial grasp
of infants In WEIT there is a chapter on vestigial traits,
defined as those traits that are evolutionary remnants of features
useful in an ancestor, but now either useless or used in a different way. But behaviors can be vestigial,
too. One such behavior is the “grasping reflex”
of human infants. When you put your finger
into the palm of an infant, it will immediately and securely grasp it. The grasp is so tight that it’s sometimes hard to make the kid let go!
It is said — though I have never seen this demonstrated — that up to a couple months of age a baby can hang suspended from a horizontal stick for several minutes. https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/the-vestigial-grasp-of-infants/ Young infants can hold onto objects with both their hands
and their feet—and hold tightly and tenaciously. They lose this behavior—which is instinctive, prompted by inserting
a finger or a stick in their hands or feet—a few months after birth. While we’re not 100%
sure what it represents, I’d bet that it’s a genetic
holdover from our ancestry as hairier primates. https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/the-grasping-reflex-of-babies-a-vestigial-trait/ The palmer grip of human babies is a genetic evolutionary
remnant of Asu, which is evidence for the origin
of man story in Oahspe instead of the Adam story in the Bible.
Close-up enlarged drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough, and comparison
to modern human hand and chimpanzee hand. The hand of Asu resembled the hand of a chimpanzee as
much or more than the hand of a modern man. -
The outer part of the hand opposite the
thumb of Asu is slighlty concave (middle part curves inward toward thumb) shaped, like the Chimpanzee hand. The modern human
hand has a convex (middle part curves outward away from thumb) shape opposite the thumb. - Evolution of
the human hand: The chimpanzee hand. The chimpanzee hand will be taken as a model
for the hand of the hominid ancestor. The most ancient hominid fossils closely resemble chimpanzees, who are genetically our
nearest relatives (Sibley, 1992; Ruvolo, 1997). Pan and human lineages diverged 5–7 million
years ago (Mya), about the time the first hominid specimens appear in the fossil record (Klein, 1999). The
fingers, metacarpal and carpal bones of the chimpanzee hand are elongated, but in typical primate fashion
the thumb is small, weak and relatively immobile The grips of the chimpanzee differ profoundly from those of
humans (Napier, 1960). For suspension from horizontal supports, chimpanzees use a ‘hook grip’
of the four flexed fingers (Napier, 1960; Marzke & Wullstein, 1996). With vertical supports, a diagonal hook
grip is used (Susman, 1979; Marzke et al. 1992). The thumb may touch the support, but does not squeeze it against the palm. Chimpanzees use this grip when flailing with sticks, but when the arm swings forward the hand tends to lose its grip, possibly
due to weakness of the thumb and its inability to overlap the index finger During its evolution, the human hand
gained two unique grips, first identified by Napier. He called them the precision grip and the power grip and depicted them
by the grip of a sphere and a cylinder. According to Napier, in the power grip the
clamp around the cylinder is formed by the partly flexed fingers and the palm, counter pressure being applied by the thumb,
which is wrapped over the dorsum of the fingers, where it acts as a buttress to reinforce the grip. Marzke (1992a)...in
the human hand. The thumb has lengthened and can be fully opposed to the fingers, which have shortened. A longer, fully opposable thumb...also facilitates gripping a club by enabling the thumb to overlap the
ends of the index and middle fingers. ...chimpanzee has been ascribed to an adaptation
for both quadrupedal and arboreal locomotion (Tuttle, 1967; Dainton, 2001). The earliest known hominid hand
bones are assigned to Ardipithecus ramidus kadabba from Ethiopia...The bones are said to be similar to those
of a younger species, Australopithecus afarensis. In fossils from Ethiopia and Tanzania (3.2–3.5 Mya),
designated A. afarensis (White et al. 1993; Johanson et al. 1994) the hand retains chimpanzee-like features and would
still have been effective for tree-climbing. The fingers were shorter than those of the chimpanzee and the
thumb is longer (Marzke, 1983, 1992b; Stern & Susman, 1983), but the fingers are long relative to the thumb when
compared to modern humans (Marzke et al. 1992). Australopithecus habilis (formerly assigned to Homo:
Wood & Collard, 1999). A. habilis gave way to Homo ergaster (African H. erectus) about 1.8 Mya.
Verified hand bones from this taxon are unavailable. Those of H. neanderthalensis (200–30 kya: Klein, 1999)
are similar to those of modern humans, The fossil record indicates that...During this prolonged
period of evolution, the hand underwent a profound remodelling...Two unique human handgrips were thereby
produced. Called the ‘power’ and ‘precision’ grips by Napier (1956) who identified and described them... Articles from Journal of Anatomy National Center for Biotechnology Information http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1571064/
-- Ardipithecus ramidus discovered in Ethiopia, are virtually intact,
and they show...She had extremely long fingers and an opposable thumb, with a comparatively narrow
The grasping reflex
is evident in the feet, too. If you put your finger along a baby’s toes from the sole side, it
will grasp with those toes. And when a baby is sitting down, its “prehensile” feet assume a curled-in posture, much like what we see in an infant or an adult chimp. https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/the-vestigial-grasp-of-infants/ The Plantar grasp reflex is a genetic holdover from our
Asu ancestry. The Plantar grasp reflex is more
evidence that the human origins as described and pictured in Oahspe is accurate.
Above comparison of the drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe to a photo of
a Gorilla sitting. Notice both the Asu and the Ape have short feet, short legs and bent knees of about the same proportional
size. Notice how Asu (Adam) is sitting down on the ground like the ape (gorilla), leg and knees bent and close to buttocks,
leaning to the side and supporting himself with one arm. Apes (like the orangutans and gibbins especially) have very long
arms with...comparatively short legs...Newbrough in Oahspe drew Asu (Adam) the first man with very long arms and comparatively
short legs. Asu's long arms like with the apes helped him in traveling efficiently in arboreal settings by climbing, swinging
and grabing branches, fruits and leaves high up in trees (as is seen in the drawing in Oahspe). - Asu appears to have a longer pelvis or hip region (for quadrupedal locomotion) than a modern man, more like a ape.
Asu's short legs and short feet is adapted for quadrupedal locomotion. Longer legs are needed for bipedalism to help
support at least 2.5 times their body weight. Modern man has longer feet and developed arches for more efficient support
of their bodies. - The very long arms to short legs ratio helped Asu with walking on all fours on the ground. Form
follows function, behavior, and intelligence. Because the Creator Jehovih made the first man different than any other animal,
without a pre-program or instinct, man would have been lacking in knowledge, intelligence, and the genetic ability to
understand and learn, so he would not have the form of walking upright on two feet (bi-pedalism) which frees
the hands for carrying and using tools and building things that the mind concieves of. Since Asu
was made without the mental ability to conceive of inventing and building things his form would have matched
his behavior and ability, and he would not need to walk upright and therefore he would mostly be a quadrapedal
and arboreal travelerlike the apes, and having very long arms and comparitevly short legs would
be in harmony with that type of mental-spiritual state. His hands would have been more advantages for grabing branches and
traveling in the trees than for holding a tool, writing a book, or typing on a computer, thus form follows function and behavior.
The purpose of Asu man was to be used as a base for physical developement for future races and sub-species
of man, it was not intended to be a complete and perfect man like the Adam of the book of Genesis in the Bible. Adam in the
book of Genesis in the Bible appears to from the story in the Bible to have been created a complete perfect man already
knowing how to walk, speak, capable of understanding the Great Spirit, etc...it appears he was created with that
ability like a pre-program or instinct like an animal. The first race of man was not made in the image and
likeness of God (of the dust of the earth, not spiritual), but the second race of man (the I'hins) was in the spiritual image
and likeness of heaven (God). The first race was of the earth only, earthly without (zero) spiritual understanding,
and having no (zero) ability (no genetics) to understand spiritual things (such as creating things, or abstract thought). - Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of man) 1 Corinthians 15:47 The
first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven - To be of
the earth only, or of the dust of the earth means without spiritual ability or understanding = zero, like corpor. Corpor =
zero. - OAHSPE'S BOOK OF COSMOGONY Chapter 8:1 1. ..To ethe give motion one hundred, or ninety-nine (as the
case may be); to corpor give zero, that is, no motion (of itself); to ji'ay give sixty-six; to a'ji give thirty-three. The numbers above represent percent of spirital ability or power, it applies to mankind. - Asu (Adam) man was
given the number of corpor = zero The I'hins (Abel), I'huans, Ghans, Mongrels, Kosmon, and Iesu races were given the
numbers from 66-99. The Yaks were given the number 11-12.5 (Yaks were 87.5% Asu, 12.5 numbers from 100% earth-Asu). The Druks (Cain) were given the numbers 33 (1/3) to 66 (2/3), a'ji, the mark of beast, the mark of Cain (war). A'ji
is 1/3 ethe, and 2/3 corpor. The Ethereans, Orians, and Nirvanians are givern the number of ethe = 99-100 - Man created blank (zero), animals with instinct Oahspe SECOND BOOK OF LORDS CHAPTER I: 17. Man inquired of the
Lord: Thou hast shown the bird how to build her nest, and the carnivore how to scent the subtle track of his prey, and the
spider to weave his net; but as to the manner of man's house, or as to herbs that are good or are poisonous, thou has not
shown man. 18. The Lord said: All the instinct that is in the bird, or beast, or fish, or insect, or creeping thing,
was created with them, but man was created blank; and yet man shall attain to more subtle senses than any other living creature. - OAHSPE BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER XII. 7. Thus differently created I man from all other things on earth;
Close-up enlarged drawing of Asu man
(Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe, showing a powerful build, human-type face, thin lips, tall nose, large brow ridges, small skull-brain capacity, low cranial
vault, sloping forehead, top of head is crested (pointed head), hair covering most of the body, not including the face with
the exception of the cheeks and jawline, patches of bare skin on the chest, neck is very short and thick, short tightly
coiled matted hair on head, disproportionately long arms compared to a modern human, a relatively pronounced bone above the
eyes, large eyes. - Sagittal crests are found in robust great apes, and some early hominins
(Paranthropus). Prominent sagittal crests are found among male gorillas and orangutans, and do occur but
only rarely in male chimpanzees... The largest sagittal crest ever discovered
in the human lineage belongs to ...Paranthropus aethiopicus...the earliest known robust hominid ancestor and the
oldest robust australopithecine discovered to date http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittal_crest, - Some of the male Australopithecus afarensis had small sagittal crests. http://anthro.palomar.edu/hominid/australo_2.htm
__^__Left, fossils of human ancestors__ ^__Right, races of man in Oahspe__
skull and head comparisons of the progress of the races of man in Oahspe to the fossil record: Fossils left side-----Right
side Oahspe races
_________________________________ Modern Human-----I'huan,
Ghan, Mongrel Homo erectus-------Yak, Druk type Australopithecus---Asu-like variation Ardipithecus--------Asu-like
Above map showing the natural habitat range of modern apes, all in the tropical regions of Africa, southeast
Asia,and Indonesia. Borneo where the gibbons and orangutan apes are found is close to the sunken continent
of Pan where Oahspe said Asu man originated (see map below).
Orangutans May Be Closest Human Relatives, Not Chimps Orangutans, not chimpanzees,
are the closest living relatives to humans, a controversial new study contends. By contrast, humans
share at least 28 unique physical characteristics with orangutans but only 2 with chimps and 7 with gorillas, the authors
say. The finding, which has the potential to spark a radical rethink of human origins, is being
met with caution. But looking at physical traits rather than genetic ones, orangutans are a better
match, Grehan and Schwartz say. Tell-tale features shared by both orangutans and humans include
thickly enameled molar teeth with flat surfaces, greater asymmetries between the left and right side of the brain, an increased
cartilage-to-bone ratio in the forearm, and similarly shaped shoulder blades. "A hole in
the roof of the mouth that was supposedly unique to humans is also present in orangs," Schwartz said. "Humans and orangs have the widest-separated mammary glands, and they grow the longest hair," he added.
"Humans and orangs actually have a hairline, in contrast to virtually all primates, where the hair comes down to the
top of the eyes." The team also highlighted orangutan-type traits in the teeth and jaw remains
of ancient fossil apes from Africa and Europe. Based on their analysis, the authors suggest "that
humans and orangutans share a common ancestor that excludes [living] African apes." But orangutans
are native to Southeast Asia, which creates a problem: How did humans evolve in Africa if we are so closely related to the
geographically distant orangutan? (Explore a human migration time line.) http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090623-humans-chimps-related.html
Humans More Related To Orangutans Than Chimps, Study Suggests June 18, 2009 — New evidence
underscores the theory of human origin that suggests humans most likely share a common ancestor with orangutans, according
to research from the University of Pittsburgh and the Buffalo Museum of Science. Reporting in the June 18 edition of the Journal
of Biogeography, Paleoanthropologist Peter Andrews, a past head of Human Origins at the London Natural History Museum
and coauthor of "The Complete World of Human Evolution" (Thames & Hudson, 2005), said that Schwartz and Grehan
provide good evidence to support their theory. Andrews had no part in the research, but is familiar with it. "They
have good morphological evidence in support of their interpretation, so that it must be taken seriously, and if it reopens
the debate between molecular biologists and morphologists, so much the better," Andrews said. "They are going against
accepted interpretations of human and ape relationships, and there's no doubt their conclusions will be challenged. But I
hope it will be done in a constructive way, for science progresses by asking questions and testing results." http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090618084304.htm
The morphological data on which their study is based include features of anatomy, reproductive
biology, and behavior. For example, among the great apes only humans and orangutans have thick tooth enamel, long hair, male facial hair, concealed ovulation, a preference for private, face-to-face
mating, and an ability to construct shelters and beds. No doubt this is going to cause a fair amount
of debate in the scientific community. Which is great. Stay tuned. Reference: John R. Grehan and Jeffrey H. Schwartz (2009). Evolution of the second orangutan: phylogeny and biogeography of hominid
origins Journal of Biogeography, in press. http://pleiotropy.fieldofscience.com/2009/06/orangutans-to-replace-chimpanzees-as.html
Above two charts show man and apes are very close in gestation periods AND chromosome numbers.
Asu-man was the borderline (dividing line) between apes and man, animal-man, Ardipithecus ramidus.
Chromosomal differences between Homo and Great Apes
Humans have a characteristic diploid
chromosome number of 2N=46 whereas the other Great Apes (orangutans, gorillas, and chimps) are all 2N=48. The large metacentric
Chromosome 2 of Homo appears to be the result of a fusion between two smaller telocentric chromosomes found in the other Great
Apes. In the figure above, Q-banding patterns in the chimp acrocentrics are homologous to those of the 2p (short) and 2q (long)
arms of human Chromosome 2: the alignments are indicated. As well, ape
telomeres (the ends of chromosomes) characteristically consist of tandem repeats of the motif 5'-TTAGGG-3'. Such sequences are also present In the human centromere (the middle of the chromosome), but at one point the order changes abruptly to 5'-CCCTAA-3', the reverse complement of the standard pattern, as predicted by a telomere
to telomere fusion of ancestral ape-like chromosomes.
"two chromosomes that are still separate in the great apes fused together in the human lineage
to produce our chromosome 2." - page 128 of Bryan Sykes' 2001 book (7 Daughters of Eve)
said Adam (Asu) the first race of man originated on earth 79,000 years ago. "everybody who is alive today is descended
from one man and one woman who lived somewhere around 50,000 to 100,000 years ago."..." with modern DNA testing,
there is more and more scientific evidence that I am right" http://www.anusha.com/allmen.htm -
What do you think a Sasquatch is? There is a
legend that says that there were three groups of people living
on the Earth and they were the big people, the little people, and the Yakama. They all live together off the
land and followed the traditional ways. Along came the (early settlers) and they started to show the Yakama their tools
and the Yakama started to follow them. The big people and the
little people saw what was happening and they went up into the mountains they wanted nothing to do with the new ways.
The Yakama weren’t allowed to go with them because they were following the white men and using their tools. http://www.bigfootlunchclub.com/2013/04/today-in-bigfoot-history-apr-07-2006.html
White men (early
settlers) = Ghans of Oahspe
Oahspe BOOK OF OSIRIS, SON OF JEHOVIH. CHAPTER I:
12. Not like lambs are the Ghans, but lions untamed, born
conquerors, with seed to learn and reason toward all things, faith in mastery, but not faith in Jehovih.
Yakama = I'huan-Ghan (Ongwee-ghans) of Oahspe big people = Yaks
of Oahspe little people = I'hins of Oahspe (see plate below)
The curve of your lower back absorbs shock when you walk. It is uniquely
human. You can see in John Newbrough's (inspired) drawing above (in Oahspe) of the I'hin and I'huan (anatomically
modern man) the curve in the spine of the lower back. The Yak (87.5% Asu-Adam) is missing the lower back spinal curvature
needed for fully bipedalism. - Oahspe said Yaks which were 87.5% Asu, sometimes walked erect (like Homo
erectus), and sometimes walked on all fours (which indicates Asu walked on all fours). OAHSPE: First
Book of the First Lords Chapter II: 5. ...And the Yaks did not walk wholly upright, but also
went on all fours. OAHSPE chapter 1:1,2,3: AFTER the creation of man, the Creator, Jehovih...called his
angels, who were older than the earth, and he said unto them: Go ye, raise man upright, and teach him to
understand. And the angels of heaven descended to the earth and raised man upright. And man wandered
about on the earth. This was the second era. "raised man upright" means Asu (Adam) did not walk wholly
upright, but also went on all fours. The fossil record (skeletons) of early man is objective evidence that the inspired drawings
of early man by John Newbrough (in Oahspe) are true.
The spine of a chimpanzee connects with the skull at the back, holding the head at an angle. The
spine of humans connects with the skull underneath, stabilizing the head when walking upright. Your spine connects with
your skull underneath and near the center, holding your head firmly upright. Comparing drawings of skulls of a early
human (left), and modern human (right) with inspired drawings by John Ballou Newbrough of a I'huan (modern man) head and neck
and Yak (87.5% Asu) head and neck. Notice the spine of the I'huan (modern man) connected with the skull underneath stabilizing
the head when walking upright. Notice the spine of the Yak (87.5% similar to Asu) connects with the skull near the back,
holding the head at an angle.
Notice the difference in John Ballou Newbrough's drawing of
the jaw of the I'huan and the jaw of the Yak. The jaw of the I'huan is angled going down from the back to the front, matching
the skull of a modern man (Homo sapiens). The jaw of the Yak is straight from the back to the front, level, matching
the skull of a early hominid (Australopithecus or Homo erectus). John Newbrough's inspired drawings in Oahspe of the
I'huan, Yak, and Asu (Adam) indicates the beast-human development and percent of human bipedalism and beast quadrupedalism. Quadrupedalism is a form of terrestrial locomotion in animals using four limbs or legs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupedalism - Image courtesy of Karen Carr Studios. Walking Upright | The Smithsonian Institution http://humanorigins.si.edu/human-characteristics/walking
Physical anatomy is a manifestation of spiritual ability.
Man walks upright to free his hands to hold tools and build things that his mind and spirit creates. The bird does not have
arms and hands.
The spiritual and physical is connected
by genetics (vortexian record). Vortexya (c, light) is intermediary between ethe and corpor. Light (electromagnetic record)
is both wave (etheic) and particle (corpor). The I'hin received his spiritual ability (genetics) from the angels (heaven).
Asu lacked the spiritual genetics and received his physical ability (genetics) from the beast (a'ji, nebula, semuan firmament,
Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of mankind) 1 Corinthians 15:47 The
first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven. Adam (Asu) was of the dust of the earth lacking spiritual
heavenly genetics (ability). Jesus was not the second man, angels (from other planets) walked the earth (and were called men)
before Jesus. Adam stood for mankind. Man refers to mankind or race or sub-species. The second man of heaven (with heavenly-spiritual
genetics) was a type, race, or sub-species of mankind called I'hin or Abel (able, spiritual ability). Adam (Asu) was the first
man, Eve (the angels, Es) were the first woman, Abel (I'hins) was actually older than his brother Cain (druks) and was
the second man. The Druks had the mark of the beast (the mark of Cain) and were war-like and slew the I'hins.
Above drawing of the pendulum of human genetics, angel-man, beast-man, dan, a'ji, spirit, flesh, 1/3,
2/3, 33, 66, and the harmonic relationship to prophetic numbers and a logarithmic spiral galaxy (Cosmogony and Prophecy).
- Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 7:18: Tables of times and measurements Loos,
33, Loo'is are angels that are Masters of Generations, 33 is the number of Man (human) and the number of a generation (genetics).
33 (33.3 %) is also the number or percentage needed for fully modern man (man 33 or 3/3, 1/3 or 33.3 % angel), the threshold
for everlasting life, spiritual understanding and ability, the seperation or dividing line between fully man (spiritual-man)
and beast-man or animal. Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy: Chapter VII: 17....from one to a thousand for each and every
characteristic designated. Number man 1 and 33,...[1 = 1/3 + 2/3 = 3/3 or 33, composed of harmonic multiples and divisions
of prophetic cyclic numbers 11, 22, and 33, and logarithmic spiral galaxy percentages]. Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy:
Chapter VIII:7. Consequently the two most important periods for the prophet's consideration come within thirty-three and sixty-six,
or, as they of old said, man and beast. In which measure man is divided into two parts (man and beast), Man
(human) = 33. Number man 1....divided into two parts = .33 and .66, 1/3 and 2/3 = 1. Man is divided into two
parts = double helix (spiral) DNA structure = logarithmic spiral galaxy. Man 3/3 (33), DNA and galaxy is divided
into two parts, light and darkness, dan and a'ji, 1/3 and 2/3 spiral. - Angel. A spirit
man. Su, also, su-gan, and gans-spe. [1 part of man, 1/3] Beast. The animal man.
The earthly part of man. [2nd part of man, 2/3] Dan. Light. A cyclic
dawn, as the Arc of Spe'ta or Arc of Bon....A dan lasts about thirty-three years. [dan lasts
33 years = 1/3 = 33] http://www.angelfire.com/in2/oahspe3/glossary.html
33 dan in Oahspe: OAHSPE: Book of Aph CHAPTER XIV: 3. ...thirty-three is the division
of dan corresponding to one hundred dans to each cycle. 2 2 Thirty-three years is one generation or mortal dan: thirty-three
hundred years is one cycle or dan of the earth's life.
OAHSPE Plate 48.--THE CYCLIC COIL. (See Oahspe Book of Cosmogony) The numbers of
the beast shall be sixty-six, and six hundred and sixty-six, and the parts
thereof. Because in the coil of the cycle, behold the distances are two
thirds of a circle.
In a double-helix (DNA) corkscrew structure (below) each
spiral or loop is 1/3 of the total. Each loop is spaced 1/3 distance apart. Second loop is spaced 2/3 distance of total.
The whole (double-helix) cycle is divided into two parts spaced 1/3 distance apart.
Harmonic, 2 and 8 based structure of DNA, Computer code, and spiral galaxy structure. The DNA structure
is a microscopic logarithmic spiral galaxy (double-helix primary vortex). DNA is composed of 2 strands, twisted together,
2 coils of a cycle. DNA like computer code is composed of a 2 base system, 0 and 1 for computer code, dan and a'ji, or ethe
and corpor for DNA and spiral galaxies. The computer codes of zeros and ones contain information program instructions.
DNA code contains genetic information instructions. Spiral galaxies contain a'ji and dan, ethe and corpor which influence
genetics and behavior. Computer code bits is in harmonic multiples and divisions of 8. The two (2) base system is a harmonic
division of 8. Multiply 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 4, 8, 16, 32 which are harmonic parts (divisions) or multiplications of 8 which are
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, etc...start off with 1 whole and multiply x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, etc...
you get all divisions or multiples of 8, like harmonic musical notes or computer bits. The 1 whole man like DNA and the spiral
galaxies is divided into 2 parts, multiplied by 2, by 2, by 2 etc.. This shows up in the 22 year prophetic numbers cycles,
22 = 1 whole cycle, divided into 2 parts, 1 part = 11 x 2 = 22, 11 x 3 = 33, 11 x 6 = 66, 11 x 9 = 99 +1 = 100, x 2 = 200,
x 2 = 400 (Mayan Baktun), harmonic multiples of the base 11. Modern human DNA contains both (2 base) Asu and Angel genetics
twisted together in a spiral-helical staircase but evolved (multiplied) to include the genetics of I'hin, Druk, I'huan, Mongrel,
Ghan, and Kosmon, 6 plus Asu and Angel = 8.
form of increase in the number of individuals (population growth) is binary
cell division. Given binary cell division, we expect the number of cells thru time to follow the powers of 2, namely 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, etc. This is basic pattern of geometric growth. http://www.uic.edu/classes/bios/bios101/x113_files/outline/index.htm -
A number of cosmological studies show that galactic superclusters exist at regularly spaced
intervals: Observations of the redshift distribution of galaxies in narrow (~ 40 arcmin) pencil-beam surveys to z
0.3 (Broadhurst et al. 1990; hereafter BEKS) reveal a highly clumped and apparently periodic distribution of galaxies. The
distribution features peaks of galaxy counts with an apparently regular separation of 128 Mpc, with few galaxies between the
peaks. http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sept01/Bahcall2/Bahcall9_2.html Megaparsec (Mpc) One parsec equals about 3.26 light-years or 30.9 trillion kilometres (19.2 trillion miles). A distance of one million parsecs (3.26 million light-years or 3.26 "Mly") is commonly denoted by the megaparsec
(Mpc). Astronomers typically express the distances between neighbouring galaxies and galaxy clusters in megaparsecs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsec
3 / .26 = 11.53 = 11 prophetic number 3.26 / 1.09 = 2.99 within 3.26
/ 1.1 = 2.963 within .037 harmonic multiple of 1.1
The prophetic cyclic number 11 (the base)
is a harmonic multiple (x 10) of 1.1
111 (gow, dan, light) is a harmonic multiple of 3.26
(light-years, parsec). 111 / 3.26 = 34.04 = within .04 harmonic The universe shows a harmonic multiple periodic
(cyclic) spacing (cosmogony-cosmology) of an octave (8). 128 Mpc is a harmonic multiple of 8 the number of harmony,
just like the computer bit code. Harmonic divisions and multiples of 8 are 1/256, 1/128, 1/64, 1/32, 1/16. 1/8, 1/4, 1/2,
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 Mpc, 256, etc...
Emergence of the Human 'SuperBrain' 75,000 Years Ago There is archaeological evidence
for the evolution of a human "super-brain" no later than 75,000 years ago that spurred a modern capacity for novelty
and invention, according to John Hoffecker, an archaeologist at the University of Colorado. Hoffecker says there
is abundant fossil and archaeological evidence for the evolution of the human mind, including its unique
power to create a potentially infinite variety of thoughts expressed in the form of sentences, art and technologies. An
internationally known archaeologist...Hoffecker. While anatomical fossil evidence for the capability of speech
is controversial, the archaeological discoveries of symbols coincides with a creative explosion in the making of many
kinds of artifacts. Abstract designs scratched on mineral pigment show up in Africa
about 75,000 years ago and are widely accepted by archaeologists as evidence for symbolism and language.
"From this point onward there is a growing variety of new types of artifacts that indicates a thoroughly
modern capacity for novelty and invention." Humans were producing perforated
shell ornaments, polished bone awls and simple geometric designs incised into lumps of red ochre
by 75,000 years ago. "With the appearance of symbols and language -- and the consequent
integration of brains into a super-brain -- the human mind seems to have taken off as a potentially
unlimited creative force," he said. http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/06/emergence-of-the-human-superbrain-75000-years-ago-the-neurologic-internet.html The evolution of the human "super-brain" occured when Angels bred with Asu
and produced the I'hin 73,000 years ago according to Oahspe.
- In OAHSPE
SYNOPSIS OF SIXTEEN CYCLES CHAPTER 1 verses 22,27 it describes a hominin species (Yaks - Ground People) that laid hold of
the I'hins when they went into the fields (wilderness). According to Oahspe these Ground People have been grabbing children
size people as far back as 24,000 years ago. I'hins were very short, the size of a modern child (3 to 4 feet tall).
- 1855: SE Oklahoma, Choctaw Territory. Bigfoots had been raiding Choctaw settlements for some time, mostly
stealing crops. But then they started stealing human children, apparently to kill and eat them, and the Choctaw had had enough.
A party, organized by Joshua LeFlore, set out to get the Bigfoots. They tracked them to a giant mound with the bodies of 19
human children the Bigfoots have been kidpnapping and eating. The Bigfoots are covered in hair, and the bad smell of their
shit and piss is everywhere. Most of the humans’ horses rear up and throw their riders, which is what horses do when
they see Bigfoots. The humans attack the Bigfoots, and LeFlore empties his revolver at one, but it’s useless. The
Bigfoot kills LeFlore’s mount with a single blow and then tears off LeFlore’s head. The rest of the Indians open
up with .50 caliber Sharp’s buffalo rifles (designed to drop a buffalo) on the beasts, from experience aiming at their
heads, as this is the best way to kill them. Two Bigfoots drop. A Choctaw Indian hunts down LeFlore’s killer and finishes
it off with a hunting knife. Then he decapitates it for good measure. 3 Bigfoots were killed in all. The Indians bury
what’s left of the kids, then bury their leader, giving him a 21 gun salute. Then they make a bonfire and burn the Bigfoots
on the fire. They ride home, heading for bad dreams, maybe lasting a lifetime. Many Western tribes describe areas of
their territory that were totally off limits, and the Indians refused to go there, for these were the territories of the Bigfoots.
These territories were full of game, but the Indians were so terrified that they avoided them like the plague. Why would Indians
avoid a forage-rich area area due to creatures that don’t even exist? Bigfoots have probably learned to fear and respect
us due to our weaponry. These creatures still abduct , rape, and eat humans. Check all the missing persons in America’s
National parks, The things are expert killers. http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/human-bigfoot-war-oklahoma-1855/ -- Similarities: - dogs refusing or unable to pick up victims scent. - Missing-411 books "hunters
attempt to pursue the creature with dogs, but the dogs refuse to give chase." - The_Legend_of_Boggy_Creek "Several
attempts were made to track the creature with dogs, but they were unable to follow its scent" - Fouke_Monster (Wikipedia) -
a few months later James Crabtree was squirrel hunting ..."there was something strange about that evening, I couldn't put my finger on it, It was just
a feeling I had. There didn't seem to be as many birds and little small animals around, they seemed mighty scarce. It stepped right out in plain sight, right out there in front of me. It was some kind of a thing I've never seen before,
well he stared at me for a little while and just slipped out of sight and I never saw him agian." - James Crabtree, _The
Legend of Boggy Creek_ - First, they said, they realized
that all sound had disappeared around them - the sounds of nature. ... - "Missing 411" Books - the ever-popular Bigfoot emerges frequently in the Pacific Northwest and Texas has reported numerous encounters with its
aptly named Big Thicket Wild Man. Yet, few know that a member
of this brotherhood of hairy hominids makes a home here in Arizona. He's known as the Mogollon Monster. Those who say
they've crossed paths with the beast regularly describe an eerie silence
prior to their encounter, an appreciable stillness in the woods that commonly surrounds predatory animals. http://www.weirdus.com/states/arizona/bizarre_beasts/mongollon_monster/index.php - a couple of cases that kids say a bear took them and protected them. - Missing-411 books "the creature,
which she initially took to be a bear," - Elizabeth Ford on Fouke_Monster -
Walhalla Girl Is Kidnaped By Large Black Bear
What kind of "Big dog" carries away a child "in his arms"? "took me
in his arms" is plural, "arms" (means 2 limbs) if the hairy creature took her in his arms and "walked
away" then it was walking on 2 limbs (bi-pedal locomotion). - Newspaper: The Morning Herald › 1951 ›
June › 9 June 1951 › Page 2 Missing Children Found [In Mountains- SANTA FE, N.M]...Youngsters Wonder From Picnic...Three small children were found tired, hungry
and thirsty but otherwise unharmed tonight, after 28 lonely hours in the rugged Sangre De Crlsto mountains. On hearing the
news, their parents burst into tears. While hundreds of searchers trudged the Jagged, steep mountains with lanterns and flashlights
last night, the three--Larry McGee, 7, his sister Janet, 6, and Steven Cross , in low log. "I took good care of them,
Larry boasted. "Once I heard some one yelling, but I didn't answer because I thought they were big gorillas. "Gee, I'm hungry. When I get home I am going to eat and eat'
State Police Chief Joe Roach radloed stated that none of the three suffered any ill effects from tbe 45 degrees night temperature.
They were clad only In T-shirts and blue jeans when they wandered away yesterday from a family picnic. The youngsters first
were sighted in Box Canyon--about 3 1/2 miles from the spot where they disappeared--by three airmen from Kirtland base at
Albuquerque. First radio report of their being found came from Tom Gardner Santa Fe radio repairman "They're all all
right," he reported. "Not scared or crying. But they sure are hungry, tired an thirsty." http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/20741509/ Why would the kids be afraid to yell out to searchers unless they had been frightened by something that looked like "big gorillas"? What type of "big
gorillas" would be in the mountains of Northern New Mexico? - Children found scratched up and disoriented,
many miles away - Missing-411 books Bobby Ford treated at a hospital for scratches and shock - The Legend Of Boggy Creek - The Legend of Boggy Creek is a 1972 horror docudrama about the "Fouke Monster,"
a Bigfoot-type creature that has been seen in and around Fouke, Arkansas since the 1950s. The film,
which claims to be a true story, In another scene, hunters attempt to pursue the creature with dogs, but the
dogs refuse to give chase. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Legend_of_Boggy_Creek The Fouke Monster, also known as the Southern Sasquatch, is a legendary cryptid reported near the town
of Fouke in Miller County, Arkansas, during the early 1970s. Although most cases date from the early 1970s onwards,
Fouke residents claim that an ape-like creature had
roamed the area since 1964, but those sightings had not been reported to news services. Local legend
also holds that the creature can be further traced back to sightings in 1946. Most early sightings were in the region of
Jonesville. Owing to this, the creature was known as the "Jonesville Monster" during this period. According
to Elizabeth Ford, reached through a screen window while she was sleeping on a couch. It was chased away by her husband
and his brother Don, who were returning from a hunting trip. The creature returned shortly after midnight (Sunday, May 2),
when it was reported to have grabbed Bobby Ford across the shoulders as he stood on the porch, throwing him to the ground.
Bobby managed to crawl free from the creature and was later treated at St. Michael Hospital in Texarkana, Texas, for scratches
across his back. He was suffering from mild shock when he arrived. Several attempts were made to track the creature with dogs, but they were unable to follow its scent..
Bigfoot ...often seen near
and around bodies of fresh water; streams, lakes and rivers. http://www.bigfootencounters.com/sightings.htm "he always travels the creeks" - The Legend of Boggy Creek "through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here
that..asu...dwell" - Oahspe
- OAHSPE: Book
of Wars Against Jehovih CHAPTER XXI: 7. ..the brown burrowers
in the ground, with long [flat] noses and projecting mouths, very strong, whose grip of
the hand could break a horse's leg. The brown people, though harmless, were naked, living
mostly on fish and worms and bugs and roots; and they inhabited the regions of the great river,
"There are many different types of Sasquatch, for instance there is a type that burrows into the ground like a giant rodent. “Zoobey”
is a bigfoot that lives around Rockglen Saskatchewan… I believe he lives in the ground. It’s been told the entrance
to his burrow about 2.5 – 3 feet around. I hope some day they find one of these burrowing Bigfoots." http://bigfootresearchuk.com/bigfootresearchworld/sasquatch-dna-video-evidence - "I am highly convinced that if bigfoot is real, they live in underground civilizations. I feel this is the
only way a species such as it could survive or avoid capture." http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread317957/pg5
-- Book of Sethantes, Son of Jehovih: Chapter X: 3. The Lord
said: On our journey let us run through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that
both asu and men dwell. And so they journeyed, surveying the earth as they sailed above. The country was mostly barren,
not supporting man nor beast. 4. But by the river sides
man dwelt, burrowing in the ground to avoid the heat by day and the cold by night. OAHSPE: First Book
of the First Lords Chapter 1: 23. The I'hins shall labor and clothe themselves, and I will abide with them; but the druks
shall wander in the wilderness, neither laboring nor
clothing themselves. CHAPTER II: 5. Now, because the druks had not previously obeyed the
Lord, but went and dwelt with the asu'ans, there was a half-breed race born on the earth, called Yak, signifying ground
people; and they burrowed in the ground like
beasts of the forest. And the Yaks did not walk wholly upright, but also went on all fours. 7. And the
arms of the Yaks were long, and their backs
were stooped and curved.
- In the 1889 Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society,
one L. H. Ransome recounts the time ten years before when a wild man was captured near the northeastern town
of Maroantsetra: We were informed by a trader from Mauritius, a Mr. Carmes, who saw him, that ... [he] was caught by
some Malagasy in the employ of a Manahar trader, while asleep on the branch of a tree, and when taken resisted violently,
biting his captors severely; after a few days' confinement, however, he ceased to be aggressive. Mr. Carmes describes him
as being a powerfully built man of about five feet nine inches in height, his face and body being
thickly covered with long black hair; his mode of walking was peculiar, as he traveled very fast,
with his head down, occasionally going on all-fours, his eyes (which resembled in expression those of
an animal rather than of a human being) invariably being fixed on the ground. When caught he was perfectly
nude, but wore clothes when provided with them. He could never be induced to eat flesh or any kind of cooked food,
subsisting entirely on manioc and other roots; nor would he sleep in a recumbent position, but when resting preferred to squat
on hands and feet on a stool in a corner of the house. After some weeks he commenced to learn a few words, and by means of
these and signs it was understood that he had a father and two brothers in the forest where he was taken.
These were found and surrounded by a search party one night, but being disturbed, easily eluded their pursuers, jumping
from tree to tree like monkeys and running on all-fours. The captured man died five months after being taken. NOVA Online | The Wilds of Madagascar http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/madagascar/surviving/legends2.html
<--Asu picking wild berries from trees and bushes
Some Homo erectus were able to move into the seasonally cold temperate zones of Asia and Europe. http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo/homo_2.htm Homo erectus lived in warm and cold climates as north as 40 degrees latitude near the Chinese Korean border which is
equivalent to Northern California and Ohio in the United States. Homo erectus close relatives (Homo Ergaster) reached
50 degrees latitude in Europe at the France/Belgium border which is equivalent to the Pacific Northwest area of Vancouver
Canada/Washington State border. These northern latitude areas of 40 to 50 degrees are where modern Bigfoot/Sasquatch
- Meganthropus -Homo erectus palaeojavanicus As of 2005, the taxonomy and phylogeny for the specimens are still uncertain, although most paleoanthropologists
consider them related to Homo erectus in some way. However, the names Homo palaeojavanicus and even Australopithecus
palaeojavanicus are sometimes used as well, indicating the classification uncertainty. The majority
of paleoanthropologists believe that Meganthropus is related to H. erectus, but it is not agreed
upon how closely. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meganthropus Some scientists claim that Meganthropus
was 2/3 the size of Gigantopithecus. This would put the hominid at
slightly over 8 feet and at least 500 pounds. Meganthropus; these creatures had bone densities several times thicker than ours, and presumeably
had muscle mass more like that of an ape than a human.
Extreme muscle mass would be absolutely necessary in order to support the bulky skeleton. One of the
most interesting things that the fossil record reveals is that we went through a period of extreme
giantism. These were people routinely over 7ft tall, they were huge. This was before
we turned into the modern humans of today. http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/interviews/interview/833/
By The late Dr. Carleton S. Coon Professor Stephen I Rosen of the University of Maryland has identified
its hair as that of a previously unknown primate--and he has hair on file for most of the living primates of the world. He
has given me permission to state that its scale pattern is primate, its pigment dense and black like that of a lowland gorilla,
and its internal structure "unusual." This last refers to the medulla of the hair strand, which is quite variable
among the living races of man. On this substantially impeccable evidence we may be justified to state that a primate
other than man, which is either a pongid (ape), or hominid (kind of man) is alive in Washington, even if the hairs did not
come off the animal identified as the creator of the local disturbance. Coon became a member of the National Academy
of Science in 1952 and served as president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists in 1961- 1962. He passed
away in 1981. http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/coon.htm
Patty: An Exploration of the Sasquatch Seen in the Patterson/Gimlin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awcyw1AwaXg - You want proof its real? In 1968 20th Century Fox released the first Planet
of the Apes. 20th Century Fox wasnt exactly a 2nd rate studio at the time and Charlton Heston and Roddy McDowell weren't exactly
B film actors. In other words this was a BIG BUDGET film. And NOT IN ONE SCENE did they produce a costume that even comes
CLOSE to what we saw in the PGfilm, not even close! In 2001 Fox REMADE the film and didnt have a costume that was as good
as the 1967 PG film. The PG film is as good as it gets. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2011/11/breakdown-of-patterson-gimlin-footage.html
Above reconstructed face of early fossil man Homo erectus (Pithecanthropus erectus) looking very Yak-like
superimposed over the face of the Patterson Bigfoot, showing a striking similarity. http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/
The scientific name Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots meaning
upright ape-man. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Man Pithecanthropus erectus - former genus of primitive apelike men now Homo erectus
Notice in the Stacy Brown FLIR still frame of the figure and close-up of the head (at
the :59 to 1:08 mark of the video above) you can see the spine of the humanoid creature connects with the skull at the back,
holding the head at an angle same as with the Yak of Oahspe and the fossills of Australopithecus or Homo erectus. This is different from a modern human (Homo sapiens) where the spine connects with the skull underneath
and near the center, holding the head firmly upright.
Finding Bigfoot episode had a side by side comparison with Bobo (James "BoBo"
Fay above) who is close to NFL Lineman size to the humanoid shape in the Brown thermal video. Bobo is 6 feet 4 inches
tall. The creature was clearly much taller than Bobo when behind the tree and out in the open it made Bobo
look like a twig. The creature covered the same distance from tree to cover in one natural step.
It took Bobo two very exaggerated and clumsy steps to cover same distance.
- Yellowstone National Park
(Arapaho: Henihco'oo or Héetíhco'oo) is
a national park located primarily in the U.S. state of Wyoming, although it also extends
into Montana and Idaho. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_National_Park - Oahspe God's First Book: Chapter XXIV:12. named Arapanseekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee
[Arapa-seekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee, ancestor of Arapa-ho and Algonquin
tribes. The Arapa-- tribes took their name
from Arapanseekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee just as Shoshone tribes took their name from
Shoshone. Oahspe God's First Book: Chapter XXIV:15. And these
took the name of the tribe of Ara, the which name survived
one thousand seven hundred and fifty years. And their people were tens of thousands. [The Arapa-- tribes took their name from Ara]. The greater Yellowstone region, which surrounds the national
park, is home to the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho
tribes who reside on the Wind River Indian Reservation. http://getawaytips.azcentral.com/yellowstone-native-american-festivals-5015.html - There is an unknown predator in our forests. Children camping with their parents in Yosemite, Yellowstone, and a dozen of other parks throughout the USA and Canada, disappeared suddenly in one minute of distraction of their guardians,
as if a predator was watching
from the cover of the trees,
choosing his time. Hundred of volunteers searching the woods, with park authorities, canine teams, even army personnel and
FBI investigators, were often late in finding the child far from the
place of disappearance, his clothes turned out, shoes missing, sometimes naked in the cold forest, or up the mountain, or in a creek bed. http://www.amazon.com/Missing-411-Western-United-States-Canada/dp/1466216298 - Oahspe First Book of God chapter XXV: 16. In the High North lay the kingdom of Olegalla, the land of giants, the place of yellow rocks and high spouting
waters (geysers). It was Olegalla who gave away his kingdom, the great city of Powafuchawowitchahavagganeabba,
with the twenty-four tributary cities spread along the valley of
Valley --Ed.]. "land of giants", "the place of yellow rocksand high spouting waters (geysers)", "along the valley of Anemoosagoochakakfuela [Yellowstone Valley --Ed.]" Here Oahspe speaks of (human)
giantsin the Yellowstone National Park area (thousands of years ago, are they
still around?). Are the "giants"
of Yellowstone that Oahspe spoke of Bigfoots (Sasquatch)?
a large, hairy creature that walks on two feet like a man and that some people claim
to have seen in the northwestern U.S. and western
Canada. Definition of SASQUATCH: a hairy
creature like a human being reported to exist in the northwestern United States and western Canada and said to be a primate between 6 and 15 feet (1.8 and 4.6 meters) tall —called
also bigfoot. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sasquatch
The Wyoming Location The BFRO has identified a location to recommend
to all amateur and professional videographers. The location is along the road from Cody, Wyoming to Yellowstone National
Park. An individual report location listed in database indicates where one or more bigfoots were sighted
or heard at one time in the past. Patterns of reports can indicate where bigfoots might
be seen in the future. The location recommended here is one where a bigfoot is very likely to be seen again
in the future, due to a pattern of past reports. The two-part criteria for this recommendation is: 1) The location has a pattern of credible reports suggesting future daylight opportunities
for footage, where 2) Several photographers would be able to seek footage simultaneously without disturbing or detering
the bigfoot(s). http://www.bfro.net/wy_hot_spot.htm Notice the maps above, the Wyoming Bigfoot hot spot (red box) is right next to the
(big) Yellowstone Lakein Yellowstone National Park. Also the Misssing 411 Wyoming
cluster of unexplained missing people (map below) is in the same area as Yellowstone National
Park and Yellowstone Lake, which is the same area as the Bigfoot hot spot (for sightings) and is
the same as the land of giants in Oahspe First Book of God chapter XXV:16. Is it a coincidence
that all this information lines up to the same area? The Missing 411 Wyoming cluster happened from
the years 1942 to 1997, 61 to 116 years AFTER Oahspe was typed. Yellowstone, Wyoming Bigfoot cluster sightings are
documented from the years 1976 - 2002, 95 to 121 years after Oahspe.