Home, Cycles, AstrophysicsMore science, Astronomy, PhysicsMore science 2 Chemistry, Physics, AstronomyHigher Advanced Knowledge of OahspeOptical Network Communications TechnologyWeather, Climate, Dark Matter, Airborne PathogensExtrasolar planets, CEVORKUM, Light speedGeology - Pole-shift - Radiometric datingSolar-Stellar Life Cycle - End of Earth - DeathBiology, Primary Vortex, Life, Computing, QuantumPhysics - Light - SoundPhysics - Magnetism - GravityThe Creator - The Father- and ManHuman origins - Pygmies - I'hinsHominidae - animal-manEarly Man - Races of Man - AnthropologyDinosaurs, Man, fossils, early EarthReligious History, Chinvat Bridge, Archeology, RaceConfucius, Po, China, Jaffeth & CaucasiansThe Great Pyramid of Ancient EgyptHell, Knots, Flash devices, Riot controlBiblical flood and the sinking of PanLooeamong, Constantine, and The Roman EmpireThe Bible, Jesus, Joshu and the EssenesColumbus, Catholics, Conquistadors, Protestants, CrusadesQuakers and inner lightThomas PaineUS HistoryKosmon cycle, people, ancestry & SHALAMSubatomic particles - String Theory - Quantum - GUTMatter - Anti-Matter, Galaxies and CosmologyWalter Russell Cosmogony and EinsteinAerospace engineering, space-ships, space travelSpace clouds, Earth travel, ORACHNEBUAHGALAHTables of prophecy and historyThe BeastORACHNEBUAHGALAH CHARTS & Day Night CyclesAngels and universe structurePower of Attraction - Visualization - Spiritual giftsSpiritual message - UFOs - EthereansCosmic Consciousness, cycles, human behaviorCycles, Predictions, Earth events, A'jiNebula, Earth's atmosphere, heat & cold, eclipse, prophecyTrue PropheciesPredictionsDirect Inspiration, Walter RussellMisc. vortex, matter, periodic table, solar system, fractals, pi and cMisc. 2, E=mc2, geometry, pi and alphabet codes, chemical elementsMisc. 3, Sacred mathematics, geometry, music, harmonics, cosmology, cyclesMisc. 4 life and planets, E-O-IH and geometry, DNA, facial recognitionMisc. 5 human DNA, neuroscience, 9-8-5, 33, creativity, solar powerProphecy, Pan, Harvest & DNAMagnetospheres - Solar planetary vortex - 3D HologramsLanguage - Symbols - Pictographs - Creator's nameOahspe and tornados, name vs concept, flat earth theory, UV-light, sympathetic resonance, drujasTae and facial recognition, Ham, Shem, Guatama, I'huan, Ghan racesOriginal Israelites and JewsMathematics, Reality, primary 3, E-O-IH, Cevorkum, EthereansAngelic star travelers, Human origins, racesVisitors and Comments

"If the author, Susan B. Martinez, Ph.D., is correct, an 890-page book called "Oahspe" is the best kept secret in the world. But it is not supposed to be a secret. It was intended to be as well known as the Bible and provide answers to humankind on all life's mysteries, including the history of the planet, the history of the human race, the fate of man, and countless other matters pertaining to the nature of man and the purpose of life."

Matter - anti-matter galaxies, superclusters, and cosmology

electron = anti or opposite spin of positron (axial, orbitic motion) of corpor in ethe'ic solution
positron = anti or opposite spin of electron (axial, orbitic motion) of corpor in ethe'ic solution
electron-positron annihilation = The collision between galaxies of opposite spin (NGC 2207 and IC 2163)

1. The ether consists of ether particles moving in all directions at velocity c [15].
2. An electron is a vortex in the ether having a counter 
clockwise spin, with the rate of spin also having a velocity 
of c and a translational velocity less than c.
3. A positron is a vortex in the ether having a clockwise spin, 
with the rate of spin also having a velocity of c and a 
translational velocity less than c.
It is well known that electron-positron annihilation generally occurs with the production of two 511 kev gamma rays (considered to be 
massless photons). For this, we will consider the electron to be analogous 
to a dust devil spinning counter clockwise in a dust storm (Fig. 1). Like a 
hurricane in the northern hemisphere, it veers left. The positron is similar, but spins clockwise and veers right. Both the electron and positron, of 
course, are considered to be matter. They have xyz dimensions, locations, 
and masses of about 1/1836 of the hydrogen atom. Because they veer 
toward each other, two dust devils of opposite spin have a tendency to 
collide, demonstrating what is normally thought of as “attraction.” They 
“annihilate” each other, becoming indistinguishable parts of their environments. Electron-positron annihilation is similar, with the kinetic energy calculated for the group of ether particles within the electron being 
. Similarly, the kinetic energy calculated for the group of ether particles within the positron is ½mv2
. Equal and opposite reactions according to Newton‟s Third Law result in the total energy change of mv2
. Because the velocity of the ether particles is c, the resulting increase in motion of the ether particles in the environment is equivalent to E = mc2
This produces a “shock wave” within the ether that appears as an electromagnetic wave, a motion within the ether medium having a frequency 
corresponding to 511 kev. Galaxies of opposite spin provide a visible model of the disruptive effect of the collision between two vortices (Fig. 
This speculation satisfies two important claims:
1. E = mc2
2. CONSERVATION: Matter and the motion of matter neither can be created nor destroyed.

antimatter = opposite spin = corpor in ethe'ic solution in opposite spin = Electron–positron

Electron–positron annihilation occurs when an electron (e−) and a positron (e+, the electron's antiparticle) collide. The result of the collision is the annihilation of the electron and positron, and the creation of gamma ray photons or, at higher energies, other particles:
e− + e+ → γ + γ [e- e+ annihilation, γ energy]
Anti-matter - All matter is conserved. That is, matter cannot be created or destroyed. Therefore, anti-matter cannot exist. Physicists incorrectly hypothesize anti-matter because collisions sometimes cause atoms to disintegrate into subcomponents too small to be detected. Even though these subcomponents are sometimes too small for detection, collectively they still equal the mass that the microcosms contained prior to the collision.
OAHSPE Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter II:
18. ...when the vortex of one of them bursteth, the corpor ...flieth instantly into dissolution more sublimated, and is lost to mortal sight.
Collisions in a particle accelerator or atom smasher cause the vortex of the corpor to burst and the particles break apart into smaller ethe'ic (aether) particles that are too small to be detected and are lost to mortal observation.
Zero (0) point energy is where the electromagnetic spectrum comes full circle (O), the beginning and the ending:
10 = complete = 100% = 0 = ether [the zero point flux]
0-1-2-3-4-0-6-7-8-9-0 = Zero point energy at both ends of the spectrum and in the center of the vortex
The electromagnetic spectrum (beyond Gamma Rays) known as the zero point spectrum.
The end result of antimatter meeting matter is a release of energy proportional
to the mass as the mass-energy equivalence equation, E=mc2 shows.[1]
Electron–positron annihilation occurs when an electron (e−) and a positron (e+, the electron's antiparticle) collide.
Voidance = Vacuum = annihilation = collision = release of zero point energy as Gamma Rays and beyond
Voidance annihilation equation (formula):
- 33 (negative vortexya -) + 33 (positive vortexya +) = O (the concept of zero, zero point energy, release of energy, Gamma Ray photons and beyond
Zero point energy is at the center, the center of the vortex, where the highest compression is = highest frequency = shortest wavelength = Gamma Rays and beyond = highest power
The center is where the positive + and negative - vortex'ya (electromagnetism) meet, collide, or voided = 0 = unified, is where the strong nuclear force meets the weak nuclear force, where gravitation meets radiation.
(>------Vortex'ya--------<) Fundamental Force
(>----Unified field-------<) Unification physics
Walter Russell said "for each solid is surrounded by a minus zero equal-and-opposite vacuity of the plus zero which we call matter."
1. Let ether [the near zero point flux]*stand as one,..and matter [corpor] as four. To ether give
motion [power] one hundred, or ninety-nine (as the case may be); to matter [corpor] give zero*,
*Zero point flux, flow, dynamic, power to produce motion = 99 or 100 %, corpor no power to produce motion.
All creation is in motion, the Creator is still 
wave, vibration, or pendulum swing motion of creation = 4, still center  of Creator = 0,  
+4+3+2+1-0-1-2-3-4 = Dual wave octave of energy, external positive vortex'ya to, center,  to negative vortex'ya to outward
4 = corpor, 3 = a'ji, 2 = Ji'ay, 1 = ethe, 0 = Jehovih, still center
"The energy of the vacuum has been analyzed and described by many researchers. Walter Russell reported to have found a means to harness this vacuum." http://www.rexresearch.com/russellcoil/russellcoil.htm
---4-3-2-1-0+1+2+3+4 = Octave of energy
_________|-------- = center, nucleus, void, vacuum, highest compression, the zero point of creation, potent unseen, 99-100%
_________|-------- = zero point, infinitesimal, ethe'ic, subatomic, quantum, singularity, oneness, entanglement, EPR effect
-33 (negative) plus + 33 (positive) = zero, voidance equation
zero point energy = center of vortex = void = vacuum = highest compression = highest energy = gamma rays and beyond = nucleur (nucleus) energy
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy Chapter II:
5. In the case of a vortex in etherea (that is after the manner of a whirlwind on the earth), the corporeal solutions are propelled toward the centre thereof in greater density.
Greater density at the center of the vortex = higher compression = higher frequency = shorter wavelength = gamma rays and beyond = atomic-nuclear radiation, release of energy, E=mc^2, multiplication of power
The positron or anti-electron is the antiparticle or the antimatter counterpart of the 
electron. The positron has an electric charge of +1e, a spin of ½, and has the same mass 
as an electron. When a low-energy positron collides with a low-energy electron, 
annihilation occurs, resulting in the production of two or more gamma ray photons (see electron–positron annihilation).

In particle physics, antimatter is material composed of antiparticles, 
which have the same mass as particles of ordinary matter but have opposite charge 
and quantum spin. Antiparticles bind with each other to form antimatter in the same 
way that normal particles bind to form normal matter. For example, a positron 
(the antiparticle of the electron, with symbol e+) and an anti-proton (symbol p) can 
form an antihydrogen atom. Furthermore, mixing matter and antimatter can lead to the 
annihilation of both, in the same way that mixing antiparticles and particles does, 
thus giving rise to high-energy photons (gamma rays) or other particle–antiparticle 
pairs. The end result of antimatter meeting matter is a release of energy proportional 
to the mass as the mass-energy equivalence equation, E=mc2 shows.[1]

NASA is...looking for X-ray and gamma-ray signatures of annihilation events in colliding superclusters.[13]

Superclusters are large groups of smaller galaxy groups and clusters and are among the largest known structures of the cosmos.
The existence of superclusters indicates that the galaxies in our Universe are not uniformly distributed; most of them are drawn together in groups and clusters, with groups containing up to 50 galaxies and clusters up to several thousand galaxies. Those groups and clusters and additional isolated galaxies in turn form even larger structures called superclusters.
Local Supercluster, It contains the Local Group with our galaxy, the Milky Way. It also contains the Virgo Cluster near its center, and is sometimes called the Virgo Supercluster. It is thought to contain over 47,000 galaxies.

There are about 50 galaxies in our Local Group (see list of nearest galaxies for a complete list), of the order of 100,000 in our Local Supercluster and an estimated number of about 170 billion in all of the observable universe.
The discovery of the nature of galaxies as distinct from other nebulae (interstellar clouds) was made in the 1920s. 

Galaxies were first discovered in the 1920s (1924). Oahspe in 1881, 43 years earlier spoke about clusters of stars, millions of stars occupying one vortex (galaxy) with one center of gravity (so-called).

A system of millions or billions of stars, together with gas and dust, held together by gravitational attraction.
Google Galaxy definition
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy V:
23. In the case of double stars, and triplets, and so on, if conjoined, the centre of gravitation (so-called) is not to each one, but to the intervening centre between them. The polarity of such a group is as to the vortex. Think not, however, that double stars or triplets or quadruples are the limit of combinations in one vortex. There are clusters of planets, hundreds of them, thousands, and even millions, that sometimes occupy one vortex.
24. As a globe can be annihilated, so can a vortex, and so can vortexya; for none of these are things of themselves in fact, but combinations in some given place or condition; but the corpor of such expression of known forms and figures and motions can not be annihilated.

Above Oahspe also talks bout annihilation, matter (corpor) and energy cannot be destroyed, it is just broken down into energy and smaller pieces (particles).
From Electron–positron annihilation you get gamma ray photons or other particles [corpor]
Photon = zero rest mass. Electron > Photon

Subatomic (corpor in ethe'ic solution) Quantum particle size: 

Planck's constant = 6.62606957 × 10-34 m2 kg / s

....electron mass = 9.10938291 × 10-31 kilograms (rest mass)

Google’s built-in calculator function 

6.62606957 × 10-34 = 32.2606957 (Planck's constant)

9.10938291 × 10-31 = 60.0938291 (electron rest mass)

10 x (-34) = -340 (Planck's constant)

10 x (-31) = -310 (electron rest mass) 

Planck's constant < electron rest mass

An electron has a small mass, less than 0.1% the mass of an atom. 100 divided by 0.1 = 1000 times smaller than an atom.

Electron–positron annihilation occurs when an electron (e−) and a positron (e+, the electron's antiparticle) collide. The result of the collision is the annihilation 
of the electron and positron, and the creation of gamma ray photons or, at higher energies, other particles:
In the 1960s, satellites designed to detect nuclear bomb explosions on Earth picked up short bursts of gamma rays coming from random points in the distant Universe. Since this discovery, the cause of gamma ray bursts (sometimes called GRBs) has been debated. It is now thought that they occur when a black hole is formed by an extremely powerful type of supernova. They may also occur when neutron stars collide.
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are flashes of gamma rays associated with extremely energetic explosions that have been observed in distant galaxies. They are the brightest electromagnetic events known to occur in the universe. Bursts can last from ten milliseconds to several minutes. The initial burst is usually followed by a longer-lived "afterglow" emitted at longer wavelengths (X-ray, ultraviolet, optical, infrared, microwave and radio).
Cosmic microwave background radiation could be the long lived "afterglow" from the collision of galaxy Superclusters instead of the "Big Bang" theory.
A supercluster known as a filament, as it is long and thin, has run through an area with a high density of galaxies, causing many collisions. It is still going and will cause further collisions.
Most observed GRBs are believed to consist of a narrow beam of intense radiation released during a supernova...
GRBs were first detected in 1967 by the Vela satellites, a series of satellites designed to detect covert nuclear weapons tests.
...subsequent studies of the galaxies and supernovae associated with the bursts, clarified the distance and luminosity of GRBs. These facts definitively placed them in distant galaxies and also connected long GRBs with the explosion of massive stars, the only possible source for the energy outputs observed.
Oahspe God's Book of Ben Plate - SHA'MAEL ...talks about the vortex of the red star bursts (explosion), red star scattered and gone, and connects it with a great light (luminosity, intense radiation) in the roadway of the firmament (sky). 

NGC 2207 and IC 2163 are a pair of colliding spiral galaxies about 80 million light-years away[2] in the constellation Canis Major. Both galaxies were discovered by John Herschel in 1835. So far four supernovae have been observed in NGC 2207 (SN 1975A, SN 1999ec, SN 2003H and SN 2013ai). NGC 2207 is in the process of tidal stripping IC 2163.

This matter-energy conversion (E=mc2 = mc2=E) frequently takes the form of electron-positron annihilation. Basically an electron and a positron (an anti-electron) are drawn together due to their opposite charges. When they inevitably collide their material existence comes to an end and they are turned into gamma ray photons.
In an opposite process, two gamma ray photons can be converted into an electron-positron pair, bringing forth matter from whence none existed. Evidence for these interactions is visible in bubble chamber experiments, such as shown above.

Here we see electrons and positrons produced simultaneously from individual gamma rays within a bubble chamber. The particles curl in opposite directions due to an applied magnetic field. The gamma rays don’t leave tracks in the chamber because they have no electric charge.
This is certainly amazing. Somehow the hard and heavy substance of matter converts into seemingly massless, sinusoidal electric fields, i.e. light waves, and vice-versa.

The sub-atomic particles curl in opposite directions = galaxies of opposite spin (NGC 2207 and IC 2163)
electron = anti or opposite spin of positron (axial, orbitic motion) of corpor in ethe'ic solution = matter
positron = anti or opposite spin of electron (axial, orbitic motion) of corpor in ethe'ic solution = anti-matter

electron-positron collision = corpor in ethe'ic solution x axial and orbitic velocity = particle accelerator = m x a = mc2 = Energy = Vortexya = matter-energy conversion (E=mc2)
gamma ray photons converted into an electron-positron pair = matter formation = vortex'ya force = compression = bringing together = creation = mass = gravitation
electron-positron pair converted into gamma ray photons = energy formation = liberated vortex'ya = taking apart = uncreation = destruction = collision = explosion = fire = radiation 
Planet-star-galaxy mergers evolve to globular or elliptical form
Though, when spirals collide with a similar-sized galaxy, the disruption can cause them to merge and evolve into a giant elliptical galaxy.
Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 3:
22. ...But were the earth's vortex to be swallowed in the vortex of another planet, then the earth would be precipitated as a globe to such planet. Such is the case as regardeth double stars, and triplets and quadruplets, especially where they are in contact...
23. In the case of double stars, and triplets, and so on, if conjoined, the centre of gravitation (so-called) is not to each one, but to the intervening centre between them....
There are clusters of planets, hundreds of them, thousands, and even millions, that sometimes occupy one vortex [a galaxy].
25. Though the general form of a vortex, as before stated, in its beginning is long, funnel-shaped (like a whirlwind), its ultimate is toward a globular form. And though the current of a vortex is spiral, at first, its currents ultimate toward less spirality.
1.Cause (an event or situation, typically a bad one) to happen suddenly, unexpectedly, or prematurely.
2.Cause to move suddenly and with force: "suddenly the ladder broke, precipitating them down into a heap".
Google precipitated definition
Oahspe's use of the word "precipitated" matches NASA's word "collide" and "disruption", and Oahspe's use of the
word "conjoined" matches NASA's word "merge". Oahspe's use of the phrase "its ultimate is toward a globular form"
matches NASA's use of the phrase "evolve into a giant elliptical galaxy".
Above Oahspe states that when Planets-stars-galaxies collide or merge (swallowed in the vortex), they evolve to globular or elliptical form (from spiral to globular or ellipitical).
Galaxy Collisions
Background Information:
Back in the mid-1970s it was becoming obvious that peculiar galaxies that did not fit into the usual classifications could be explained by knowledge of tidal interactions. We now know that galaxies can, and usually do experience many collisions or tidal interactions over the course of their existence, which are strong enough to profoundly impact their structure and speed up their evolutionary processes.
The term "tidal interaction"..."tidal gravity forces".
Scientist didn't discover that spiral galaxies collide, merge and evolve into elliptical (globular) galaxies until after the mid-1970s. Oahspe (in 1881) more than 92 years BEFORE had this same information. Nasa uses the termes "tidal interaction" and "tidal gravity forces" and Oahspe uses the term "vortexian tide" - Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 11:9


Outward spiral waves from a spinning vortex produce a push force that cause the observed so-called expansion and acceleration of the universe.
Astronomical Sources of Microwave Radiation
Active galaxies (AGN), powered by supermassive black holes at their cores, produce microwave radiation, and are some of the strongest emitters. Additionally, these black hole engines will create massive jets and lobes that glow brightly in the microwave. These lobes can sometimes be larger than the entire galaxy.
Similarly, the center of our own Milky Way Galaxy is a source of microwave radiation. Likely this is linked to the theorized supermassive black hole at our galaxy's core. While ours is not an Active Galaxy, the center is still quite a dynamic place.
Pulsars (rotating neutron stars) are also strong sources of microwave radiation. These powerful, compact objects are second only to black holes in terms of ultimate density. With powerful magnetic fields and fast rotation rates broad spectrum radiation is produced, with the microwave emission being particularly strong.
When a microwave telescope is pointed in nearly all directions a faint microwave glow is apparent. This is known as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).
The CMB is uniform across the entire observable Universe (with error). Discovered in 1964 by radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, a discovery for which they won the Nobel Prize in 1978
New Cosmology.
Vortex Theory against the Big-Bang Theory. 
Rotating galaxies produce radiation (radio and microwaves).
The cosmic microwave background radiation is the radiation that has been produced by billions of galaxies spread throughout the universe that has ever existed.
Big Bang, Deflated? Universe May Have Had No Beginning
by Tia Ghose, LiveScience Staff Writer   |   February 27, 2015 10:52am ET
If a new theory turns out to be true, the universe may not have started with a bang.
In the new formulation, the universe was never a singularity, or an infinitely small and infinitely dense point of matter. In fact, the universe may have no beginning at all.
"Our theory suggests that the age of the universe could be infinite," said study co-author Saurya Das, a theoretical physicist at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada.
A way to test the theory
One way of interpreting the quantum correction term in their equation is that it is related to the density of dark matter, Das said.
If so, the universe could be filled with a superfluid made of hypothetical particles, such as the gravity-carrying particles known as gravitons, or ultra-cold, ghostlike particles known as axions, Das said.
"the universe could be filled with a superfluid" = sounds like ethe'ic solution of Oahspe

There are so many spiral shaped galaxies all over the universe.
Spinning galaxies produce outward spiral waves, that produce a push force that causes the observed so-called expansion and acceleration of the universe.
The vortex property of galaxies produce outward spiral waves (propagating away from it).
The spiral waves push against other galaxies causing a repulsion, expansion of distance between the galaxies. The only exception to this spiral repulsion is when the galaxies are bound by the same vortex (master vortex).
Galactic vortex spiral waves are the cause for the red-shift of galaxies. Red-shift or expansion is created by the ethe'ic waves produced by the spinning spiral galaxies.
Check out:
The theory on the website above is very similar to the theory I recieved from thought and inspiration independently of the above site.
How galaxies and stars (worlds) are created:
12...Amidst the ethe'ic waves, the ethereans gather up the atomic elements floating therein, and, giving them axic motion, propelling them forth, aggregating the while, till, from a mite, it groweth as large as the whole earth [or star, or galaxy].
Oahspe - Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter II:
1. THERE are two known things in the universe: ethe and corpor. The former is the solvent of the latter.
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSOGONY CH. III:12 says "vortexya, in fact, is no substance or thing as such; but is the vortex in axial and ORBITIC MOTION, or, in other words, corpor in an etheic solution. 13....When a portion of this solution is given a rotary motion it is called a vortex.
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy Chapter II:
5. In the case of a vortex in etherea (that is after the manner of a whirlwind on the earth), the corporeal solutions are propelled toward the centre thereof in greater density.
6. When it is sufficiently dense ...it is called ...a planet [star, or galaxy].
New Theory = Vortex star formation = galaxy formation
New Theory Shows How ‘Zombie Vortices’ Play a Role in Star Formation
August 21, 2013
UC Berkeley researchers have developed a model that shows how vortices help destabilize the disk so that gas can spiral inward toward a forming star.

OAHSPE Book of Jehovih CHAPTER 3:

4. By the power of rotation, swift driving at the periphery, I condense the atmospherean worlds that float in the firmament; and these become My corporeal worlds. In the midst of the vortices I made them, and by the power of the vortices I turn them on their axes, and carry them in the orbits I allotted to them.

6. For each and every corporeal world I created a vortex first, and by its rotation and from the places in the firmament where it traveled, I caused the vortex to conceive the corporeal world.

7. To make the sun I created a great vortex, and within this vortex and subject to it, I made the vortices of many of the corporeal worlds. The sun vortex I caused to rotate, and I gave it power to carry other vortices within it. According to their density and position, they are thus carried forth and around the sun.

Vortex creation of the stars, galaxies and universe vs. the "Big Bang" theory.
Interesting to note here is the fact that there is no physical mechanism in the near-vacuum of outer space to compress gas into a ball. A cloud of hydrogen gas must be compressed to a small enough size so that gravity can dominate it. For example, our own sun is a stable sphere of gas. But what force could initially press it into a ball? Scientists have no answer. Experiments indicate that it would be next to impossible for floating gas molecules out in space to clump together. There is nothing to compress it. How could the stars evolve from floating gasses? Gravity is not a sufficient mechanism to do this. In outer space, the gas is millions of times more expansive than the critical compressed size needed for gravity to hold it as a stable star. Because of this, outward gas pressures cause these clouds to keep spreading outward! They do not pull together, but instead gradually move outward. In spite of all the starry theories of the evolutionists, the fact remains that gas in outer space always has a density so rarified that it is far less than the emptiest atmospheric vacuum bottle in any laboratory in the world! How could such rarified hydrogen "push itself" into planets and stars? How then did the lumps [the galaxies, stars, planets, moons, and asteroids] get there?

Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter II: 12. But nowhere in etherea is there a solution of corpor sufficient to put itself in motion; nor sufficient to condense itself; nor to provide the road of its travel.

"Few cosmologists [theorists about the origin of matter and the universe] today would dispute the view that our expanding universe began with a bang—a big hot bang—about 18 billion years ago. Paradoxically, no cosmologist could now tell you how the Big Bang ultimately gave rise to galaxies, stars, and other cosmic lumps. 

"As one sky scientist, IBM's Philip E. Seiden, put it, 'The Standard Big Bang model does not give rise to lumpiness. That model assumes the universe started out as a globally smooth, homogeneous expanding gas. If you apply the laws of physics to this model, you get a universe that is uniform, a cosmic vastness of evenly distributed atoms with no organization of any kind . . 

"How then did the lumps [the galaxies, stars, planets, moons, and asteroids] get there? No one can say, at least not yet and perhaps not ever." —*Ben Patrusky, "Why is the Cosmos Lumpy?" in Science 81, June 1981, p. 96. 
I believe Oahspe's "etheic solution in rotary motion" or vortex is the cause of compressing inter-stellar gas into a ball that creates stars and planets. 

John Bell, interviewed by Paul Davies in "The Ghost in the Atom" has suggested that an aether theory might help resolve the EPR paradox by allowing a reference frame in which signals go faster than light. He suggests Lorentz contraction is perfectly coherent, not inconsistent with relativity, and could produce an aether theory perfectly consistent with the Michelson-Morley experiment. Bell suggests the aether was wrongly rejected on purely philosophical grounds: "what is unobservable does not exist" [p.49]. Einstein found the non-aether theory simpler and more elegant, but Bell suggests that doesn't rule it out. Besides the arguments based on his interpretation of quantum mechanics, Bell also suggests resurrecting the aether because it is a useful pedagogical device. That is, many problems are solved more easily by imagining the existence of an aether.

Quantum mechanics can be used to describe spacetime as being "bitty" at extremely small scales, fluctuating and generating particle pairs that appear and disappear incredibly quickly. Instead of being "smooth", the vacuum is described as looking like "quantum foam". It has been suggested that this seething mass of virtual particles may be the equivalent in modern physics of a particulate aether.

Dark energy is sometimes called quintessence due to its similarity to the classical aether. Modern physics is full of concepts such as free space, spin foam, Planck particles, quantum wave state (QWS), zero-point energy, quantum foam, and vacuum energy.
The 19th century had the ether, the 20th century had the quantum wave state, quantum foam and the EPR Effect (inseparabilty). 
The Big Bang theory is based on redshift, what if scientists interpretation of redshift is wrong? 
Redshift of stars and universe expansion, The Big Bang theory
Does redshift have to do with age or length of time not speed of expansion?
Redshift is NOT due to age
You have heard that distant galaxies do appear to be more 'blue in color' than nearby galaxies, and this is the case, but this is not related to any blueshift, but rather due to the fact that distant galaxies, because one is looking back in time to see them at great distances, are younger (a galaxy at a distance of 5 billion light years has stars on average 5 billion years younger than the stars in nearby galaxies). Light from young galaxies is dominated by hot, blue stars, much younger than yellow and red stars such as our own sun. Thus the distant galaxies appear blue, even as their light is redshifted.
In physics (especially astrophysics), redshift happens when light seen coming from an object that is moving away is proportionally increased in wavelength, or shifted to the red end of the spectrum. 
Cosmological redshift is seen due to the expansion of the universe, and sufficiently distant light sources (generally more than a few million light years away) show redshift corresponding to the rate of increase of their distance from Earth.
Conversely, a decrease in wavelength is called blueshift and is generally seen when a light-emitting object moves toward an observer
The most distant objects exhibit larger redshifts corresponding to the Hubble flow of the universe. The largest observed redshift, corresponding to the greatest distance and furthest back in time,
The Secret of Light - Page 176-177 by Walter Russell:
The so-called “red shift” in the spectrum proved this to be fact. The fact is true. They do rush away from each other, but the conclusion drawn from that observed fact is not justified by the processes of natural law.
The reason for the universal expansion which is now taking place is that the universe as a whole breathes inward and outward just as all things in nature do.
Large-scale breathing cycles of the whole universal body consume untold aeons for the completion of one cycle while man consumes but a few seconds to complete his cycle.
Man of aeons to come will witness the effect of nebulae rushing toward each other at the same speeds for the same number of aeons.
In all Nature there is no effect of motion which is not balanced by an opposite effect.
There are more almost 7000 blue-shifted galaxies listed in the NED1 web site. Being blue-shifted means that they are approaching the earth
In the last two year almost 200 blue-shifted galaxies have been added to the NED web site—most likely credit to the Hubble telescope. The pattern that they form in the sky seems to be a useful tool to explore our universe.
1 This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
When I said Dynamic Universe Model explains the existence of Blue shifted Galaxies, people laughed at me, How can this phenomenon be explained in a purely expanding Universe model….?
32% are Blue shifted Galaxies
There are two key pieces of evidence for Big Bang theory. These are red shift and the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation.
Astronomers estimate that their are billions and billions of galaxies in the observable universe (as well as some seven trillion dwarf galaxies) . Here's how astronomers breakout  the visible universe within 14 billion light years: 
Superclusters in the visible universe = 10 million

Galaxy groups in the visible universe = 25 billion

Large galaxies in the visible universe = 350 billion

Dwarf galaxies in the visible universe = 7 trillion

Stars in the visible universe = 30 billion trillion  (3x10²²)

Astronomers realized this past year that they may have underestimated the number of galaxies in some parts of the universe by as much as 90 percent, according to a study in 2011 by Matthew Hayes of the University of Geneva's observatory, who led the investigation using the world's most advanced optical instrument -- Europe's Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile, which has four 8.2-meter (26.65-feet) behemoths. They turned two of the giants towards a well-studied area of deep space called the GOODS-South field.
In the case of very distant, old galaxies, the telltale light may not reach Earth as it is blocked by interstellar clouds of dust and gas -- and, as a result, these galaxies are missed by the map-makers.
"Astronomers always knew they were missing some fraction of the galaxies... but for the first time we now have a measurement. The number of missed galaxies is substantial," said Matthew Hayes of the University of Geneva's observatory, who led the investigation.
So this mysterious cosmic fog just turned out to be distant, blurry galaxies. This is not surprising. Perhaps next we will find that the microwave background radiation is just more blurred and distant galaxies. It either goes on forever and ever, or there is eventually a Truman Show-wall at some point. 
The galaxies actions & performances look the same between early Universe and current Universe. For that large number of galaxies, this is a strong indication that there is no early Universe at all. This situation gives sign that the Universe model is closer to "Cloud & rain model" rather than "The Big Bang theory." 
The Galactic Background Radiation
The ever-present sound of our galaxy 
...the ever-present galactic background radio noise. It can always be heard but not always at the same strength. The discovery of the origin of this background noise is usually marked as the birth of radio astronomy.  
the Milky Way appears to us as a fuzzy band of light arching across the sky...
A European space observatory has discovered something peculiar about our galaxy: it’s humming in microwaves and, for the moment, the source of the radiation is a complete mystery.
The Planck space observatory was launched in 2009 to analyze small fluctuations in the ubiquitous cosmic microwave background (CMB) — complementing data gathered by NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe. To understand the structure of the CMB is to open a window on the conditions immediately after the Big Bang. This extremely faint radiation is the ancient “echo” of the creation of the Universe over 14 billion years ago.
Cosmic microwave background radiation could be the long lived "afterglow" from the collision of galaxy Superclusters instead of the "Big Bang" theory.
A supercluster known as a filament, as it is long and thin, has run through an area with a high density of galaxies, causing many collisions. It is still going and will cause further collisions.
If scientists interpretation of redshift is wrong, and scientists interpretation of the COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND RADIATION (CMBR) is wrong, and the Big Bang theory is largley based on redshift and the CMBR, then perhaps there was no big bang and the Universe has always existed.
The ALL MOTION was His speech.
Oahspe Book of Jehovih: Chapter I:
1. ALL was. ALL is. ALL ever shall be. The ALL spake, and Motion was, and is, and ever shall be;...The ALL MOTION was His speech. 
[In the begining was the word (Motion) and the word was with God (the Creator), and the word (Vortex Motion) was God (the Creative Ethe'ic Force) John 1:1 the Bible. http://biblehub.com/john/1-1.htm. The Creator is the unmoving mover, that created all motion (the whole universe is in motion)]
4. By virtue of My presence all things are. By virtue of My presence is life. By virtue of My presence are the living brought forth into life. I am the QUICKENER, the MOVER, the CREATOR, the DESTROYER. I am FIRST and LAST.

Another big difference between Oahspe and the Bible is the drawings in Oahspe, the Bible has no drawings or artwork from it's authors. Oahspe has drawings and artwork of things man did not and could not have known in 1881.


Above image on the right, Oahspe plate Illustrations of corporeal worlds number 4 titled SHAPE OF OUR UNIVERSE, showing spheroidal disk shape of our universe (galaxy) and the position of the sun about 1/3 or 1/4 distance from the center. Another name for a galaxy is an island universe. At the time in 1881 man did not know the size of the galaxy, and man thought the Sun was in the center of the universe. Newbrough got the size (relative to the sun), shape, and position of our sun (25% distance away from center) correct in his drawing of our island universe (galaxy). You can even see parts of the spiral arms of our Milky Way galaxy in the Oahspe illustration (along the outer parts of the disk shape).  

The shape of the Milky Way as deduced from star counts by William Herschel in 1785; the solar system was assumed to be near the center.

The first attempt to describe the shape of the Milky Way and the position of the Sun in it was carried out by William Herschel in 1785 by carefully counting the number of stars in different regions of the sky. He produced a diagram of the shape of the galaxy with the solar system close to the center.[27] Using a refined approach, Kapteyn in 1920 arrived at the picture of a small (diameter about 15 kiloparsecs) ellipsoid galaxy with the Sun close to the center...In 1755, Immanuel Kant introduced the term "island Universe" for these ....


island universe 
Web definitions
A galaxy is a massive, gravitationally bound system that consists of stars and stellar remnants, an interstellar medium of gas and dust,...

How did scientists determine our location within the Milky Way galaxy?

"The position of the sun in the Milky Way can be further pinned down by measuring the distance to all the stars we can see. In the late 18th century, astronomer William Herschel tried to do this, concluding that the earth was in the center of a 'grindstone'-shaped cloud of stars. But Herschel was not aware of the presence of small particles of interstellar dust, which obscure the light from the most distant stars in the Milky Way. We appeared to be in the center of the cloud because we could see no further in all directions. To a person tied to a tree in a foggy forest, it looks like the forest stretches equally away in all directions, wherever one is.

"A major breakthrough in moving the earth from the center of the galaxy to a point about 3/5 away from the edge came in the early decades of this century, when Harlow Shapley measured the distance to the large clusters of stars called globular clusters. He found they were distributed in a spherical distribution about 100,000 light-years in diameter, centered on a location in the constellation Sagittarius. Shapley concluded (and other astronomers have since verified) that the center of the distribution of globular clusters is the center of the Milky Way as well, so our galaxy looks like a flat disk of stars embedded in a spherical cloud, or 'halo,' of globular clusters.

"In the past 75 years, astronomers have refined this picture, using a variety of techniques of radio, optical, infrared and even x-ray astronomy, to fill in the details: the location of spiral arms, clouds of gas and dust, concentrations of moleculesand so on. The essential modern picture is that our solar system is located on the inner edge of a spiral arm, about 25,000 light-years from the center of the galaxy, which is in the direction of the constellation of Sagittarius.


Even in the early twentieth century, the prevailing view was that our Sun was the center of not only the Galaxy, but also of the universe.

...before the early part of the twentieth century, astronomers had a markedly different view of the stellar system we inhabit...Like the Copernican revolution before them, the twin ideas--that the Sun is not at the center of the Galaxy and that the Galaxy is not the center of the universe--required both time and hard observational evidence before they gained widespread acceptance.

Harlow Shapley (November 2, 1885 – October 20, 1972) was an American astronomer. He is notable for his groundbreaking 1918 work using Cepheid variables to estimate the size of the Milky Way Galaxy and the sun's position within it


It wasn't until 1918 that astronomers discovered that our Sun was not at the center of the Galaxy, but Oahspe contained this knowledge 37 YEARS BEFORE in 1881. Oahspe also got the shape of our galaxy right, a disk shape instead of barred, elliptical, or irregular shape like many other galaxies.


For centuries, astronomers asked many basic questions about the Milky Way. What is it? What is it made of? What is it shaped like? These questions were difficult to answer for several reasons.

  1. We live inside the Milky Way. It's like living inside a gigantic box and asking, what is the box shaped like? What is it made of? How do you know?
  2. Early astronomers were limited by technology. The early telescopes weren't very large, didn't have much range and couldn't magnify great distances or resolve them.
  3. Early telescopes could detect only visible light. The Milky Way contains a lot of dust that obstructed their views. In some directions, looking at the Milky Way is like looking through a dust storm.

The 20th century brought great advancements in telescope technology. Large optical, radio, infrared, and X-ray telescopes (both ground-based and orbiting space telescopes) allowed astronomers to peer through the vast quantities of dust and far into space. With these tools, they could piece together what the Milky Way actually looks like.

What they discovered was amazing:

  • The Milky Way is actually a galaxy -- a large system of stars, gas (mostly hydrogen), dust and dark matter that orbits a common center and is bound together by gravity.
  • Our galaxy is spiral-shaped.[disk]
  • Contrary to popular belief, our solar system is not at the center of the galaxy.
  • The Milky Way is but one of billions of galaxies in the universe.
  • http://science.howstuffworks.com/milky-way.htm


Enlarged illustration in Oahspe (plate Illustrations of corporeal worlds number 4) of the shape of our Island Universe (Milky Way Galaxy) and showing the location of our Sun away from the center, which man did not know untill 1918 (37 years after Oahspe).


Above 4 images show the evolution of Man's knowledge of our Milky Way Galaxy shape.
From top to bottom:
1. Thomas Wright (1750):
Picture motivated by theological considerations
Wright made no new observations.
2. William & Caroline Herschel (1785):
3. Jacobus Kapteyn (1901 thru 1922):
4. Shapley's Results (1921):
Right basic result, but too big:
Shapley ignored interstellar absorption
Caused him to overestimate the distances.
Our present view of the Milky Way today is largely Shapley's model, but corrected for the effects of interstellar absorption:
A flattened disk of stars ...
The effects of absorbing material in galaxies were recognized before the physical nature of galaxies became clear...
Dust has been observed in two guises - optical/UV absorption and far-IR emission.
The classical test for effects of dust on the overall light emerging from galaxies traces back at least to Holmberg's 1958 paper, using the surface-brightness versus inclination test.
Holmberg's mpg- magnitude system (1958) is used... corrections for galactic and internal absorption are applied
www.books.google.com/books?isbn=9027704279  page 156


OAHSPE: Book of Fragapatti CHAPTER XXVIII:
4....so are there in the etherean firmament currents [vortices] ...
In 1881 Oahspe talked of currents in the etherean firmament (sky, intergalactic space).
Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy IX:1 says "The same force, vortexya, pervadeth the entire universe but different, according to volume (size), velocity (speed) and CONFIGURATION (structure).
The gravitational waves suggested by the BICEP2 results would have expanded across the entire universe at that time, Irwin said. The length of one of these waves -- the distance between peaks and troughs -- would have been billions of light years across.
Instead of temperature, BICEP2 scientists were looking specifically at the polarization of the cosmic microwave background -- that is, the direction the electric field is pointing across the sky.
Researchers were looking for a specific type of polarization called "B-modes," which signify a curling pattern in the polarized orientations of light from the ancient universe, said Jamie Bock, co-leader of the BICEP2 collaboration and professor of physics at California Institute of Technology.
In theory, this swirling polarization pattern could only be created from gravitational waves. And that is what BICEP2 found.
a curling pattern....swirling polarization pattern = vortexya
a curling pattern....swirling polarization pattern = created from vortexian waves.
The gravitational waves pattern = manifestation of vortexian currents
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter I:
45...Nor is there any substance of gravitation. These powers are the manifestation of vortexya.

Any comments about Oahspe or this website? Email Me. I look forward to talking to you about Oahspe and this website

If you find this information helpful to you please feel free to make a $20 dollar donation and help support my research.  Thank You.

If you want to donate more than $20 enter the amount here. Thank you for supporting my work.

Enter supporting content here

With a $20 or more donation I am also avaliable for a 30 minute phone consultation and I will answer questions you may have. Email me or leave a comment if you want a phone consultation.