Home, Cycles, Astrophysics, Human developmentMore science, Astronomy, PhysicsMore science 2 Chemistry, Physics, AstronomyHigher Advanced Knowledge of OahspeOptical Network Communications - Facial recognitionWeather, Climate, Dark Matter, Airborne PathogensExtrasolar planets, CEVORKUM, Light speedGeology - Pole-shift - Radiometric dating-A'jiSolar-Stellar Life Cycle - End of Earth - DeathBiology, Primary Vortex, Life, Computing, QuantumPhysics - Light - SoundPhysics - Magnetism - GravityThe Creator - The Father- and ManHuman origins - Pygmies - I'hinsHominidae - animal-manEarly Man - Races of Man - AnthropologyDinosaurs, Man, fossils, early EarthReligious History, Chinvat Bridge, Archeology, RaceConfucius, Po, China, Jaffeth & Caucasian originThe Great Pyramid of Ancient Egypt and ThothmaMathematical knowledge of Israelites and sub-Saharan AfricansHell, Knots, Flash devices, Riot controlBiblical flood and the sinking of PanLooeamong, Constantine, and The Roman EmpireThe Bible, Jesus, Joshu, Essenes, AnunnakiColumbus, Catholics, Conquistadors, Protestants, CrusadesQuakers and inner lightThomas PaineUS HistoryKosmon cycle, people, ancestry & SHALAMSubatomic particles - String Theory - Quantum - GUTMatter - Anti-Matter, Galaxies and CosmologyWalter Russell Cosmogony and EinsteinAerospace engineering, space-ships, space travelSpace clouds, Earth travel, ORACHNEBUAHGALAHTables of prophecy and historyThe BeastORACHNEBUAHGALAH CHARTS & Day Night CyclesAngels, universe, genetics, Loo'isNordic Aliens-Angels, Greys, Neoteny and ManPower of Attraction - Visualization - Spiritual giftsSpiritual message - UFOs - EthereansCosmic Consciousness, cycles, human behaviorCycles, Predictions, Earth events, A'jiNebula, Earth's atmosphere, heat & cold, eclipse, prophecyTrue PropheciesPredictionsDirect Inspiration, Walter RussellMisc. vortex, matter, periodic table, solar system, fractals, pi and cMisc. 2, E=mc2, geometry, pi and alphabet codes, chemical elementsMisc. 3, Sacred mathematics, geometry, music, harmonics, cosmology, cycles, fractals, chaosMisc. 4 life and planets, E-O-IH and geometry, DNA, facial recognitionMisc. 5 human DNA, neuroscience, 9-8-5, 33, creativity, solar powerProphecy, Pan, Harvest & DNAMagnetospheres - Solar planetary vortex - 3D HologramsEther Vortex PhysicsLanguage - Symbols - Pictographs - Creator's nameTornados, name vs concept, flat earth theory, UV-light, sympathetic resonance, drujasTae and facial recognition, Ham, Shem, Guatama, I'huan, Ghan racesMathematics, Reality, primary 3, E-O-IH, Cevorkum, EthereansOriginal Israelites and JewsIsraelites I'huans Ghans Adinkra TesseractETHICAL TEACHINGS OF OAHSPE, Government on EarthAngelic star travelers, Human origins, racesAstrophysics, OpticsVisitors and CommentsDonation

How authentic is Oahspe?
Absolutely clear channels are rare, when none of the receiver's personality or ideas
color the finished product.
How clearly was Oahspe received?
Oahspe 24: says "Not immaculate in this book, Oahspe." This is reiterated by Judgement XX:29,
Macculate means spotted; having a blemish or error.
One error in Oahspe may serve as proof that Dr. Newbrough was not personally involved with
its contents:
The following charts illustrate the correct order of the Orian Field plates (plates 53-55, in 1882 edition; plates 53-57 in 1891 editions). These plates have been out of order and incorrectly
captioned in every edition of Oahspe thus far published.
Each cut represents 9000 years instead of 3000. When the plates are arranged in correct order and assigned to the arc they correspond to, the Kosmon Arc begins in HUY (confirmed by the Book of Knowledge 4:20).
The last cut (looking different form the others) is of the 3 arcs to follow the current Kosmon "Arc of Su'is" (i.e. the future).
If Dr. Newbrough had knowledge of what he was receiving, he would not have placed the plates out of order, nor applied the captions incorrectly! Neither did he correct the problem in the 1891 edition.
Oahspe was received clearly, and is an authentic representation of the records in the library of heaven. (First Book of God, Chapter XXVIII).
Oahspe is what it says (Judgment XVII:3,4). - Removing OAHSPE's Enigma By Jim Dennon
Infinite Matter - Progressing from smaller masses to larger ones, every microcosm is part of something larger...all matter is infinitely divisible and integrable. Mega-vortex: a massive spiraling structrue larger than our observable universe. Some cosmologists use the terms pocket-universe or parallel-universe to convey a similar concept. However, mega-vortex better describes the hierarchical nature and spiral motion of this hypothesized structure. Multiverse is an oxymoronic synonym for universe. Some cosmologists use the term multiverse to convey a hierarchical structrue to the universe. - UNIVERSAL CYCLE THEORY (2011).
Below is a picture of the Observable Universe (red) orbiting the Local Mega-Vortex.

Observable Universe orbiting Local Mega Vortex u
screen cap

Oahspe - Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter XI 6. There is no such thing as separating
science and religion. To obtain knowledge and to do good; these are valuable.
Oahspe Book of Knowledge Part I:
30. Tae said: I will reason with Thee, Jehovih, for all I know shall be based on science and truth. From
Thine own perfection am I inspired to this end, and my talents shall be strengthened by pursuing the
exact sciences of all the known truths
. Neither will I put away mine own judgment, nor accept for truth
that which is at variance with Thy established laws.

Talents shall be strengthened by pursuing and learning physics, astronomy, mathematics,
physical anthropology, Neuroscience, and genetics.
Definition of exact science. : a science (as physics, chemistry, or astronomy) whose laws are
capable of accurate quantitative expression.

Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter III verse 20:
20. They have said there are five elements of corpor; then again sixty; and a hundred. But in time they will say there are millions. And yet all of them are comprehended in the word corpor. To resolve them, discover them, and classify them, and their combinations, is the work of man. 
At the time Oahspe was written in 1881 man had only discovered and classified 64 elements (Gadolinium is the 64th element discovered in 1880). In 1952 as Oahspe correctly predicted man discovered and classified the 100th element named Fermium, 72 years after Oahspe was typed.
Creation of elements:
International Scientists Race to Create the Heaviest Element in the Universe
Two international teams are competing to create the heaviest element in the universe. Super-heavy elements are the elements at the bottom of the periodic table with an atomic number (the number of protons) above 104. The previous heaviest element, temporarily called ununoctium, was "discovered" in 2002, and the two teams are now attempting to produce elements 119 and 120.
The basic principle of creating super-heavy atoms is simple: smash the atoms of one element into those of another and their protons will add up to create a new element. Titanium's 22 protons will join berkelium's 97 to create an atom with 119 protons, one atom of element 119.
Oahspe on elements of corpor, creation, aggregate
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter III:
20. They have said there are five elements of corpor; then again sixty; and a hundred...And yet all of them are comprehended in the word corpor...Where they are aggregated together...the result is called a CREATION...What is creation more than to make a drop of rain [or to make a new chemical element].
1 ag·gre·gate: formed by adding together two or more amounts
Definition of AGGREGATE
: formed by the collection of units or particles into a body, mass, or amount :  collective: as a (1) :  clustered in a dense mass...
Compression of the ethe'ic solution (which contains infinitesimal sub-atomic particles, needles, or strings) by the vortexian spiral force creates matter, mass, density, protons, atoms, and elements.
Aggregate = creation = 2 + 2 creates 4.
Titanium's 22 protons will join berkelium's 97 to create an atom with 119 protons, one atom of element 119 = aggregate = creation.
1952 is the first year man created a new element that is not found in nature, even in trace amounts. That was elements number 99 and 100 which Oahspe predicted man would discover (element 100) and Oahspe defined how they would be created, "aggregated together"...elements of corpor...a hundred (element 100 fermium).
Fermium is a synthetic element with symbol Fm and atomic number 100...formed by the absorption of six neutrons by a uranium-238 nucleus..[aggregate, creation, new element].
Oahspe correctly predicted element 100 and predicted how it would be created by aggregation (six neutrons by a uranium-238 nucleus) 71 years BEFORE it occured in 1952.
99. einsteinium, Es, named after the theoretical physicist Albert Einstein (1952).
100. fermium, Fm, named after Enrico Fermi, the physicist who produced the first controlled chain reaction (1952).
26. This, then, is the genesis of the cycles, i.e., First Jehovih and His Times, and all the created things from without a beginning. And Jehovih was the Unseen, which is spirit, and the Seen, which is His Person and body.
27. By being in mastery over His Person, Jehovih created countless worlds of which the corporeal earth is one...
The above states that the Creator created from his person, everything being a part of Him. He did not create from nothing, otherwise you say he is nothing. Creation is the moving of parts and putting parts together with other parts, an aggregate. Jehovih being one with and master over the parts of his person can move them around at will (the all-motion is his speech) and create by aggregation, not by something from nothing. There is no such thing as something from nothing. It says "First Jehovih and His Times, and all the created things from without a beginning" so here OAHSPE clearly states the created parts had no beginning (without a beginning).
OAHSPE Book of Discipline Chapter XIV:
21 ...Jehovih, Creator, Ruler and Dispenser, worlds without end. Amen!
OAHSPE Book of Ouranothen CHAPTER 1:
21. And He is forever bringing together (creating), and forever dissolving and dissipating worlds without number. |1238|
22. Illimitable |1239| in soul and spirit, forever quickening into life from His own parts, without loss or waste, or lack of space, and without hindrance.
1238  being too many to count
1239  limitless, immeasurable, inexhaustible, infinite, uncircumscribable
Oahspe Book of Fragapatti, Son of Jehovih: Chapter XXIV:
16. To learn to create, to invent, to cast one's spirit forth with power to congregate and make, is to go on the right road.
Number of large (visible) nebulae outside our solar-system
discovered from 1881 to present (8,000+)
Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 2:
2.18. There are at present, visible from the earth, more than eight thousand external nebulas, of sufficient size to be self sustaining,
New General Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars (NGC), in full A New General Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars, being the Catalogue of the Late Sir John F. W. Herschel, Bart., revised, corrected, and enlarged,  basic reference list of star clusters, nebulas, and galaxies. It was compiled in 1888 by Danish astronomer Johan Ludvig Emil Dreyer, who based his work on earlier lists made by the Herschel family of British astronomers. Dreyer included 7,840 celestial objects, a total raised to 13,226 by his first and second Index Catalogues (IC), published in 1895 and 1908, respectively. With these supplements the NGC covers the entire sky, although many objects visible with modern instruments are not listed.
In 1888 Danish astronomer Johan Ludvig Emil Dreyer included 7,840 celestial objects in the New General Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars (NGC), a total raised to 13,226 in 1895 and 1908. In 1881 and 1888 man had not yet discovered those 8,000+ nebulae that Oahspe spoke of.
In 1895 and 1908 a total raised to 13,226 but of that 13,226 maybe half that were Nebulae (maybe 6,613), the other half star clusters and galaxies. So by 1908 man had still not discovered the 8,000+ nebulae Oahape spoke about in 1881. It took man more than 27 years to discover the number of Nebulae visible from the earth (of sufficient size to be self sustaining) that Oahspe spoke of.
Oahspe was more than 27 years ahead of astronomers on the number of large visible Nebulae outside of (external) the solar-system.
How many nebulae are there total?
I need an estimate of how many nebulae there are in the universe for a report and I can't find it anywhere!
If you want to estimate something when there is no way to do so, that is of course your choice.
Count how many nebulae are listed on these lists, then extrapolate that to the over 100 billion galaxies estimated in the observable universe.
The reason you can't find a total for the universe is that it does not exist. We can count nebulae in the part of the Milky Way galaxy that we can see (about 30% of all of it). But our galaxy is one of perhaps billions of galaxies in the universe.
In 1907, beginning with a simple thought experiment involving an observer in free fall, he embarked on what would be an eight-year search for a relativistic theory of gravity. After numerous detours and false starts, his work culminated in the presentation to the Prussian Academy of Science in November 1915 of what are now known as the Einstein field equations. These equations specify how the geometry of space and time is influenced by whatever matter is present, and form the core of Einstein's general theory of relativity.[2]
General relativity predicts that the path of light is bent in a gravitational field; light passing a massive body is deflected towards that body. This effect has been confirmed by observing the light of stars or distant quasars being deflected as it passes the Sun.[59]
"the real reason why general relativity is widely accepted is because it made predictions that were borne out by experimental observations. The primary one that put general relativity on the map was its prediction of the bending of starlight by the sun, which in 1919 was confirmed by observation during a solar eclipse. That was the moment when general relativity emerged from the realm of theory and entered the realm of being a piece of reality as we know it." - Physicist-author Brian Greene, June 13, 2003 interview to NOVA
OAHSPE Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy chapter 6 :1,2
It is an error to say that the eye sees the sun by means of a straight line. The line of sight to the sun is spiral and oval...allowance must be made for the vortexian spirality.
Oahspe described that the path of light is not a straight line but bent (spiral) in a gravitational (vortexian) field in 1881, 34 years BEFORE the brilliant scientist Albert Einstein presented this theory in 1915, and 38 years before this was confirmed by observation during a solar eclipse in 1919. It is reported that Einstein had a copy of Oahspe. Einstein is often regarded as the greatest scientist of the 20th century. 
8 years before Einstein died in 1955:
Gravity Research Foundation
The Cosmogony of Oahspe was sent to and read by Albert Einstein in 1947:
According to Walder Billa of Death Valley, California in 1965, Einstein's comment was "THE AUTHOR HAS WRITTEN THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH".
About Walder Billa Vital Statistics:


A vortex causes matter to rotate, which produces circular cycles... explain much, if not most, of what happens in the universe. - Page 1 of The Universal Cycle Theory (2011) by Stephen J. Puentz and Glenn Borchardt, PH.D (Geology).
According to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, matter bends the fabric of space and time. The distortion of the space-time continuum even affects the behavior of light.
Einstein was wrong, its not matter, that causes those effects, it is the vortexya, the etheic solution in axial and orbitic rotary motion [the axial motion is a fractal of the orbitic motion, see Miscellaneous chapter/page of this website 1/2 way down from top].
The gravitational lens effect is created by the vortex external to the planet or star, not by the planet or star.
Wrong conclusions from correct mathematics.
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter III:
17.. A man may prophesy by a traveling wagon what time it will reach town; but the correctness of his prophecy does not prove that the wagon pushed the horse to town.
Although Einstein was wrong about the cause of the gravitational lensing effect, his equations and calculations work because as Oahspe said "it is a trifling difference whether a man prophesy [calculate] by a vortex or by a planet".
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter III:
18. Planetary disturbances are not caused by any power or effect of one planet on another; the cause of the disturbances lieth in the vortices wherein they float. Mortals can not see the vortices; their only means of prophesying lieth in corpor. A man may prophesy of the moon by calculations of the disturbances of the tides. But to attribute to the tides the CAUSE of the moon's position would be no more erroneous than to attribute the cause of tides to the moon.
19. It is not the intention, in these revelations, to give new calculations in regard to occurrences on the planets; it is a trifling difference whether a man prophesy by a vortex or by a planet. Wherein he erreth in regard to judging the cause of things, he should be put on the right road. Wherein he hath had no knowledge of the forces and currents of the unseen worlds and their dominion over the seen worlds, revelation only can reach him.

Disappearing stars

There is a strange phenomenon which is the fact that stars disappear at high altitude.
So to capture images of those magnificent stars we will need to find film taken by someone with a really expensive top-end professional video camera (television camera) or ones used for filming movies perhaps. Television cameras use CCD sensors instead of the cheaper CMOS ones that camcorders use. CCDs are more sensitive, but it seems that size really is the most important factor when it comes to low-light sensitivity. The bigger the sensor, the more light they let in. 
So, with these criteria in mind is there any verifiable NASA footage out there?

Yes there is.

I found these two videos:

New Views of Endeavour's Launch from Booster Cameras

Endeavour Launch



(The white thing in both of the images is one of the shuttle’s booster rockets after being ejected.)

Looking at either of the videos you can tell by the sheer overwhelming brightness of the earth that the camera was set to be very sensitive to light.

 But still no stars!
Where are they?

"I first came upon it while researching the visibility of stars, the
planets and even the Sun, which I had been claiming was not possible
without the Earths ionosphere. In the cosmology section I found the
quote "Without the Earths atmospherean lens, the stars and planets would
not be visible, and the Sun would only appear as a small, pale red dot".
Also, the brightness of the Moon, viewed from Earth is explained in a
way which modern science does not accept, but fits in with how I believe
the process works. Much more to read, but the science, if correct, could
turn our modern beliefs on their head."  - Gary Nicholls on Oahspe, March 30, 2012

<> Without the earth's atmospherean lens, man could not even see the moon, nor the stars
"Well that may have been one small step for Neil, but it's a heck of a big leap for me...Just for the record, I don't see any stars out here." Astronaut Nary Captain Bruce McCandless II during the first untethered space walk. Feb. 7 1984. Science Digest Magazine 1/1985. - Martha Helene Jones
 I have been trying to find
someone on the science boards to explain how it is I can see Mars by eye
quite clearly, even though its angular size is less than 1/2 of the
accepted limit of the eye. With the Celestia astronomy program, Mars has
an apparent diameter of 4.25 arc minutes, whereas its true size is about
.5, and that is at closest approach. Nobody can provide any figures or
formulas or reasons that make it work by reflection of Sunlight.
The other thing is that Mars has never been photographed, or seen by
eye, from the Space Station, and I recently went through hours of video
of the EVAs from the ISS to try and see if the Moon or stars were ever
mentioned, and there is nothing, even when I match the EVA with a
Celestia simulation, showing a full or nearly full Moon, and no Sun. The
Moon should provide around 2 lux when full up there, more than enough to
see by, but that is never mentioned.  - From: "Gary Nicholls", March 20, 2013
Magnification with a Gravitational Lens?

One of the most distant observed objects in the universe, 13.4 billion light years, was observed with the help of the gravitational lens effect. The experimenters report an effective magnification of about 30, which allowed them to observe an object which would otherwise have been undetectable. 
This image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope shows the galaxy cluster MACS J1206.
What Oahspe called vortexian lens in 1881, scientist called gravitational lens after Einstein's special theory of relativity (1915-1919).. Albert Einstein presented this theory in 1915, and 38 years AFTER Oahspe this was confirmed by observation during a solar eclipse in 1919. 
Gravitational lensing magnification 
Vortexian lens = Gravitational lensing = bending of light = bending of lines of corporeal needles in solution = Curved lens = Magnifying power
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter III:
7. The student should consider this from the standpoint of a magnifying lens in a microscope, which hath power to distend many things so one can see through their fibres, which to the naked eye seem dense.
He's said to have managed to shoot a photograph of this "atom" by means of a so called "microscopio lenticolare" (lens-based microscope). 
"The microscope was built with lenses that were rotating at high speed." - royalblue May 13, 2016
Magnetic Universe
16. When a nebulous planet is sufficiently dense to have its matter polarized, but so that its polarity corresponds to the polarity of the master, it is transparent, and possesses no eclipse power.- i.e. dark matter, the word ji'ay is the name used by Oahspe - Martha Helene Jones
Whatever they are, dark matter particles are transparent to light, and unlike most components of ordinary matter,


In astronomy and cosmology, dark matter is a type of matter hypothesized to account for a large part of the total mass in the universe. Dark matter cannot be seen directly with telescopes; evidently it neither emits nor absorbs light or other electromagnetic radiation at any significant level.[1] Instead, its existence and properties are inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, radiation, and the large scale structure of the universe. It was first postulated by Jan Oort in 1932 to account for the orbital velocities of stars in the Milky Way and Fritz Zwicky in 1933 to account for evidence of "missing mass" in the orbital velocities of galaxies in clusters. According to consensus among cosmologists, dark matter is composed primarily of a new, not yet characterized, type of subatomic particle.[3][4] The search for this particle, by a variety of means, is one of the major efforts in particle physics today.[5]


Oahspe described transparent dark matter, transparent dark planets and stars in interstellar space in 1881, 51 years BEFORE it was first postulated and its existense and properties were first inferred by any man on earth.


6. There is no such thing as separating science and religion. To obtain knowledge and to do good; these are valuable.

7. Without discipline knowledge can not be obtained; without discipline little good can be accomplished. Forms and ceremonies must accompany discipline; otherwise inharmony overcometh all. These are religion.

  Superstring theory is an attempt to explain all of the particles and fundamental forces of nature in one theory by modelling them as vibrations of tiny supersymmetric strings.
According to the theory, the fundamental constituents of reality are strings of the Planck length (about 10−33 cm) which vibrate at resonant frequencies. Every string, in theory, has a unique resonance, or harmonic.
String theory is an active research framework in particle physics that attempts to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity. It is a contender for a theory of everything (TOE), a self-contained mathematical model that describes all fundamental forces and forms of matter.
String theory posits that the electrons and quarks within an atom are not 0-dimensional objects, but rather 1-dimensional oscillating lines ("strings").
[String Theory = lines of vortex'ya made of sub-atomic needles of corpor, that spin and vibrate. The spin of sub-atomic particles in lines ("strings") was first stated in OAHSPE in 1881 (see Subatomic particles - String Theory chapter of this website), long before the spin of the electron or any other sub-atomic particle was thought of.]
String theory posits that the electrons and quarks within an atom are not 0-dimensional objects, but made up of 1-dimensional strings. These strings can oscillate, giving the observed particles their flavor, charge, mass and spin. Among the modes of oscillation of the string is a massless, spin-two state—a graviton. The existence of this graviton state and the fact that the equations describing string theory include Einstein's equations for general relativity mean that string theory is a quantum theory of gravity. Since string theory is widely believed[7] to be mathematically consistent, many hope that it fully describes our universe, making it a theory of everything. String theory is known to contain configurations that describe all the observed fundamental forces and matter but with a zero cosmological constant and some new fields.[8]


 34. ...As the lines of vortexya are in currents from the outer toward the interior, so do the solutions of corpor take the shape of needles
 35....But that which is called light is polarity of corporeal needles in solution, caused by the lines of vortexya.
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY CH III:2 ..."ethereally connected by solutions of corpor needles linear in position."
1. In the transposition of needles of corpor from parallel polarity to mixed or transverse positions, are produced all kinds of colors. It is an error to say: Wave of light, or bent ray of light, or that a given number of vibrations or undulations produce different kinds of colors; there is neither wave nor undulation in fact. Needles are arbitrary and can not be bent. Compare a needle to a transparent glass crystal. Place a given number of these end to end, touching, and in a line: To bend this line is impossible, save at angles, for where every two ends join there will be an angle: Be the needles ever so short there will be no bend in fact, but a succession of arbitrary lines and elbows.

2. Such is not, however, the juxtaposition, save when they are in a line direct; otherwise the ends of the needles do not bend like joints, but each one turneth more or less on its own axis. If they all turn, an APPARENT wave is produced, expressive of a certain color; if part of them turn, another color is produced. In proportion to this disturbance, so are the APPARENT vibrations slow or fast, as to mortal observation.

Chapter IV

5....As previously stated, corpor being in solution in ethe, hath in the main the shape of needles, but of such infinitesimal size that corporeal knowledge of them can only be, at most, subjective knowledge.


According to modern physics (since 1970) the fundamental constituents of reality are strings  or 1-dimensional oscillating lines. According to Oahspe (in 1881) the fundemental constituent of matter (corpor) or energy (light) are needles (in a line) or vibrating lines.


Needle: a small, slender, rodlike instrument, A slender pointer or indicator

String: Something configured as a long, thin line
Strings = lines of vortexya = needles of corpor

According to the modern Superstring theory (since 1970), the fundamental constituents of reality are strings of the Planck length (about 10−33 cm) (infinitesimal size).


According to Oahspe (1881), corpor being in solution in ethe, hath in the main the shape of needles, but of such infinitesimal size that corporeal knowledge of them can only be, at most, subjective knowledge. [At the time Oahspe was written in 1881 corporeal knowledge of the needles or polarized strings was subjective, but after 1938 with the invention of the electron microscope SOME of the LARGER polarized strings or needles could be seen with corporeal eyes for the first time (electron microscopes can magnify up to about 10,000,000x vs only 2000x for ordinary light microscopes). See Physics - Magnetism - Gravity page and Electron Microscopy Imaging (photos - micrographs) of string needle shaped polarized pattern of magnetized iron and cobalt.




Here is a very brief outline of the development of string theory, the details of which will eventually fill many large volumes written by many people directly and indirectly involved in this rich and fascinating story.

 Electromagnetism can be derived from gravity in a unified theory if there are four space dimensions instead of three, and the fourth is curled into a tiny circle. Kaluza and Klein made this discovery independently of each other.
1970String theory is born
 Three particle theorists independently realize that the dual theories developed in 1968 to describe the particle spectrum also describe the quantum mechanics of oscillating strings. This marks the official birth of string theory.

OAHSPE BOOK OF JEHOVIH CHAPTER III : 3 says"The whirlwind made I as a sign to man of the manner of my created worlds. OAHSPE BOOK OF INSPIRATION CHAPTER I : 23 says "As the whirlwind gathereth up dust, and driveth it toward a center, so is the plan of My universe." WITHIN THE VORTEX (the etheic solution in rotary motion) lies the SECRET OF CREATION. Why atoms, molecules, moons, planets, stars, and galaxies are round in shape is because the center of a vortex is round, matter is driven to the center and formed into a round ball by the force of the vortex. The reason matter (corpor) in its most infinitesimal size is needle or thin line shaped is because the currents of a vortex are in thin lines (or strings) like the lines of a phonograph record. The currents of the vortex lines up the corpor, the corpor takes the shape of the currents.
5....As previously stated, corpor being in solution in ethe, hath in the main the shape of needles, but of such infinitesimal size that corporeal knowledge of them can only be, at most, subjective knowledge.
Planck length = corporeal needle or strings = lines of vortexya units
A hydrogen atom is about 10 trillion trillion Planck lengths across
the Planck length is the smallest measureable length
In physics, the Planck length, denoted ℓP, is a unit of length, equal to 1.616199( 97)×10−35 metres. It is a base unit in the system of Planck units.
1.616 = 1.618 = golden ratio, ratio between two fibonacci numbers
The Planck length is 1.616 X 10-35 meters long. That's about 1 ten-octillionth the diameter of an atom. The Plank length was conceived by Max Planck in 1899.
1.65 is a harmonic division (half) of 3.3 (1/3) of 10 (or 9.9, ethe is 100 or 99). 33 is a prophetic number and a logarithmic spiral number (1/3 of circle or galaxy).
.5 of 3.3 = 1.6 = half, balance, or symmetry of 1/3. 1.618 = 1 / .618 = 1.618 = symmetry, balance
1.616 = 1 / .616 = 1.62 = 1.616 rounded up to nearest second decimal = symmetry, balance at the smallest scale of the universe. 
Pi ratio (of circle circumference to diameter) = 3.14 / 2 = 1.57 = 1.6 rounded up to nearest decimal = golden ratio
On page 284 of the book DARNKNESS, DAWN AND DESTINY (DRAWN FROM OAHSPE) by Augustine Cahill it says "Oahspe speaks rather casually of the "sun's sun", around which OUR SUN IS IN ORBIT.

the sun's sun:
7. ..orbitic and vorkum; the plan of the hissagow, and the cycles of the earth; the cycles of the sun; and the cycles of the sun's sun;..
New observations by the GLIMPSE legacy team with NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope indicate that the bar-shaped collection of old stars at the center of our galaxy may be longer, and at a different orientation, than previously believed. The newly-deduced size and angle of the bar are shown relative to our Sun's location. Our Milky Way galaxy may appear to be very different from an ordinary spiral galaxy.

Text: APOD

Also available showing with our Sun's position:
At the time Oahspe was typed in 1881 the concept of our sun orbiting another sun or star was not in accordance with the astronomical knowledge of the period. Even in the early twentieth century, the prevailing view was that our Sun was the center of not only the Galaxy, but also of the universe.
 ...before the early part of the twentieth century, astronomers had a markedly different view of the stellar system we inhabit...Like the Copernican revolution before them, the twin ideas--that the Sun is not at the center of the Galaxy and that the Galaxy is not the center of the universe--required both time and hard observational evidence before they gained widespread acceptance...Nineteenth-century astronomers were greatly hampered in their efforts to probe and understand the Galaxy by their inability to determine reliable distances to astronomical objects. Prior to the discovery of the main sequence in 1911 and the development of the distance-measurement technique now known as spectroscopic parallax, the locations of objects lying more than a few hundred parsecs from Earth were all but unknown. 
Early in the twentieth century, the American astronomer Harlow Shapley used observations of RR Lyrae stars to make two very important discoveries. First, he proved that most globular clusters reside at great distances--many thousands of parsecs--from the Sun. Second, by measuring the directions and distances to each, he was able to determine their three-dimensional distribution in space. In this way, Shapley demonstrated that the globular clusters map out a truly enormous, and roughly spherical, volume of space, about 30 kpc across. But the center of the sphere lies nowhere near our Sun--in fact, it is located nearly 8 kpc away from us in the direction of the constellation Sagittarius.

In a brilliant intellectual leap, Shapley realized that this 30-kpc-wide distribution of globular clusters maps out the true extent of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy--the region that we now call the Galactic halo. The hub of this vast collection of matter, about 8 kpc from the Sun, is the Galactic center. As illustrated in Figure 23.9, we live in the suburbs of this truly huge ensemble of matter, in the Galactic disk (or Galactic plane)--the thin sheet of young stars, gas, and dust that cuts through the center of the halo.

Shapley's bold interpretation of the globular clusters as defining the overall distribution of stars in our Galaxy was an enormous step forward in human understanding of our place in the universe. Five hundred years ago, Earth was considered the center of all things. Copernicus argued otherwise, demoting our planet to an undistinguished place removed from the center of the solar system. Yet even in the early twentieth century, the prevailing view was that our Sun was the center of not only the Galaxy, but also of the universe.


Harlow Shapley (November 2, 1885 – October 20, 1972) was an American astronomer.

He is notable for his groundbreaking 1918 work using Cepheid variables to estimate the size of the Milky Way Galaxy and the sun's position within it


It wasn't until 1918 that astronomers discovered that our Sun was not at the center of the Galaxy or universe and was in orbit around the central sun(s) or central star(s) of the Galaxy, but Oahspe contained this knowledge 37 YEARS BEFORE in 1881.

Oahspe in 1881 said there is a "cycle" or orbit to the sun's sun, or that our Milky Way galaxy has a cycle or orbit around the centre of gravity of the Local Group.

7. ..orbitic and vorkum; the plan of the hissagow, and the cycles of the earth; the cycles of the sun; and the cycles of the sun's sun;..
Inside the Local Group,. there are three major spiral galaxies and a few dozens smaller (dwarf) galaxies. They are all in orbit around the centre of gravity of the Local Group. The Local Group is the group of galaxies that includes Earth's galaxy, the Milky Way. The group comprises more than 54 galaxies (including dwarf galaxies), with its gravitational center located somewhere between the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy.

The term "The Local Group" was introduced by Edwin Hubble in Chapter VI of his book The Realm of the Nebulae (Hubble 1936, pp. 124–151)

It probably was AFTER 1936 when "The Local Group" was first introduced by Edwin Hubble to the scientific world that scientists discovered that our Milky Way galaxy has a cycle or orbit around the centre of gravity of the Local Group. Oahspe called this movement the "cycles of the sun's sun" 55 years BEFORE. 
Local Group (clickable map)
Earth's Location in the Universe
Oahspe - Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter IX:
1. THE same force, vortexya, pervadeth the entire universe, but differently, according to volume, velocity and configuration...
On January 11, 2013, the discovery of the Huge-LQG was announced by the University of Central Lancashire, as the largest known structure in the universe by far. It comprises seventy-three quasars, with a minimum diameter of 1.4 billion light-years, but over four billion light-years at its widest point.[2] According to researcher and author, Roger Clowes, the existence of structures of the magnitude of large quasar clusters was believed theoretically impossible. Cosmological structures had been believed to have a size limit of approximately 1.2 billion light-years.[3][4]
What’s the biggest thing in the universe?  That would be a  cluster of quasars so large it would take a vehicle traveling at the speed of light 4 billion years to cross.
The structure, known as a Large Quasar Group, or LQG, is so massive scientists say it may challenge a fundamental principle of cosmology...“While it is difficult to fathom the scale of this LQG, we can say quite definitely it is the largest structure ever seen in the entire universe,” astronomer Roger Clowes, with the University of Central Lancashire, said in a statement.
At its widest point, the LQG is about 1,600 times greater than the distance between the Milky Way galaxy and its nearest neighbor, Andromeda...
Huge Quasar Cluster is Largest Cosmic Structure? Tell the Truth. There are probably "Cosmic Structures" that
would dwarf this one. There is more that the Observable Universe, Perhaps Billions of more Universes.
This observation gives the advantage to "Cloud & rain model" comparing against "The Big Bang theory"
The LQG is evidence of a cosmic vortex, a cosmic phalanx or serpent
Picture of LQG shows similar long serpent S shape as the solar phalanx drawn in Oahspe in plate 38. ANOAD and fig 2 of plate 51 form of vortexian currents. The LQG is clearly seen as a long chain of peaks indicated by black circles. (The red crosses mark the positions of quasars in a different and smaller LQG).
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Plate 39.--ANCAD.C'vork'um...embracing nine phalanxes, and fig 2 of Plate 51 form of vortexian currents.
Long chain configuration of vortexian currents.
Diamonds in interstellar medium, dense molecular clouds
In 1881 Oahspe stated that diamond substances are in a'jian regions (dense molecular clouds) in interstellar space.
3. Onward sped Lika's airavagna now in the Roads of Nopita, now in the a'ji'an Forest of Quion, most rich in adamantine substances, arches, stalactites and stalagmites, and in forming and dissolving scenes, a forest, a very background in the etherean worlds for the over-brilliant crystal regions of light.
ad·a·man·tine  adj.
1. Made of or resembling adamant.
2. Having the hardness or luster of a diamond.
adamantine - having the hardness of a diamond.
Definition of ADAMANT
1:  a stone (as a diamond) formerly believed to be of impenetrable hardness
2:  an unbreakable or extremely hard substance
Diamonds in the sky
As discussed earlier in this chapter and in chapter 6, various carbonaceous solids are expected to form around carbon-rich AGB stars. So far, the discussion has centred on silicon carbide, PAHs and various forms of hydrogenated amorphous carbon. Another form of carbon that could be present around these stars is diamond.
Diamonds in the interstellar medium were were first proposed by Saslaw & Gaustad (1969), who argued that, although graphite is the thermodynamically stable form of carbon in dust forming regions and in interstellar space, it was possible that diamond could form as a metastable product(see section 3.2.3). Following this theoretical work, interest in interstellar diamonds lay dormant until, in 1987, they were found, in meteorites, rather than in interstellar spectra (Lewis et al., 1987).
Diamonds in the interstellar medium
When meteoritic diamonds were discovered, there had been no observational evidence for diamonds in interstellar space. Then, in 1992, Allamandola et al. (1992) found an absorption feature in the spectra of protostars embedded in dense molecular clouds at 3.47µm (2880 cm-1 ), which they attributed to sp3 bonded C-H, i.e. hydrogenated diamond-like particles. Thus, we have evidence of diamonds in space. Their observations suggested that the diamond-like grains seemed to be ubiquitous in dense clouds, while methyl (-CH3) and methylene (-CH2) rich material dominated the diffuse ISM. The diamond signature was only found in dense molecular clouds and not in the diffuse ISM, which was surprising because thorough mixing is expected to occur between the dense and diffuse media. Allamandola et al. (1992) suggested that the absence of -CH2 and -CH3 bands, together with appearance of the sp3 bonded -CH not found in the diffuse ISM, implies that C-rich materials in the diffuse medium do not become incorporated into, or do not survive incorporation into, dense molecular clouds. Neither destruction by shocks (which are weak in dense clouds) or UV photolysis (mild as a result of dust extinction), or H atom attack (which would make -CH2 and -CH3 groups rather than destroy them) can explain the apparent lack of the carbon-rich diffuse cloud components in dense clouds.
It is my proposal that we need to turn the argument around. I would argue that, without any explanation of how it got there, the sp3 bonded -CH is stable in the dense molecular clouds where it is protected from the severe environment outside. Only when it leaves the dense cloud is it converted into -CH2 and -CH3 by the harsher environment. If this is the case, we need to seek out a very effective mechanism by which -CH2 and -CH3 groups would be converted into sp3 bonded -CH inside the dense molecular clouds. However, if this paradigm is correct, the diamonds are formed in dense molecular clouds and are not of interest in a discussion of dust formation around carbon-rich AGB stars. Therefore, let us consider the meteoritic evidence for the origins of interstellar diamonds further.
Diamonds in the interstellar medium were first proposed by Saslaw & Gaustad (1969), 88 years AFTER Oahspe had that information.
In 1992 observational evidence of diamonds in interstellar space was discovered, 111 years AFTER Oahspe.
Oahspe said the diamonds were in a'ji regions which are dense molecular clouds, instead of Ji'ay regions which are diffuse clouds and that is where they have been discovered, in the dense molecular clouds (a'jian regions).
The most relaxing colors are generally believed to be cool shades such as green and blue. Designers, psychologists, feng shui experts, and advertisers all agree that blues and greens make us feel calm, balanced, and less emotional. They use these hues, especially a sage green, in hospitals, test centers, and television stations to ease nerves and attenuate harsh emotions. Whether this reaction has to do with the effect of wavelengths on brain chemistry, linguistic associations, cultural meanings, or coincidence, has yet to be fully determined.
Interior designers noted that people consistently describe rooms painted blue and green as relaxing and harmonious, a finding that has been backed up by scientific studies. Architects and painters use colors from the cool part of the spectrum like blues and greens on walls and ceilings in bedrooms and bathrooms where people like feeling peaceful.
Driving down any highway in the United States, you'll notice that every sign noting an exit or interchange is comprised of reflective white letters on a chalky, dark green background. Civil engineers determined that a driver's eyes don't get as tired looking at print on a green field, yet the colors provide enough contrast for easy character recognition. Another place we see green used is in the "green room" of theaters or television studios because nervous performers are quieted by the color. This is also the reason surgeons wear green scrubs. Hospital waiting rooms, psychiatric wards, and prison cells often paint their walls green for the same effect.
Green, which is Nature's colour, is restful, soothing, cheerful, and health-giving. - Paul Brunton
•Green is often used in decorating for its calming effect. For example, guests waiting to appear on television programs often wait in a “green room” to relax.
•Green is thought to relieve stress and help heal. Those who have a green work environment experience fewer stomachaches
GREEN is neither a warm or cool colour as it contains equal amounts of Yellow (warm) and Blue (cool). Due to this balance, it is very calming and pleasing to the senses.
Green is nature (constant renewal) and the colour of spring, which is the promise of a new beginning or regeneration of what was. For decades many hospital recovery rooms have been painted a soft shade of green as patients "renew" or heal faster when this colour is present.
In every day speech, we refer to a nature reserve or park as a Green Belt. Most large TV studios and theaters have a Green Room where performers and guests can relax before going on the air.
We call special soldiers whose mission is to restore peace (harmony) Green Berets and we have a special organization whose members assist and protect endangered wildlife and habitats called Green Peace. We even refer to avid recyclers as people that have Gone Green.
Remember, as the neutral point in the light spectrum, Green harmonizes and grounds us.
Color(Wavelength nm),(Frequency THz)
red 780 - 622, 384 - 482
orange 622 - 597, 482 - 503
yellow 597 - 577, 503 - 520
green  577 - 492  520 - 610
blue 492 - 455, 610 - 659
violet 455 - 390, 659 - 769
Thz = terahertz (THz) = vibrational frequency
White light is a mixture of the colors of the visible spectra. 
384 + 769 = 1153 / 2 = 576.5 THz = middle, center, balance = green (520 - 610 THz)
576 is almost at the perfect center of the green range of the color spectrum.
Green is good for you
Psychologists' research explains the mental and physical restoration we get from nature--and has important implications for how we build our homes, work environments and cities.
When psychologist Rachel Kaplan, PhD, switched offices at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, she was only a little surprised by how good she felt in the new space. The office where she had spent the past 17 years looked out on a barren wall in a courtyard whose sole tree had long since been removed. Her new office offers a tree-top view.
As Kaplan works at her computer or chats on the phone, she can now gaze out at trees and watch the birds and squirrels as they leap from branch to branch. The effect these sights have had on her outlook only confirms what she and husband Stephen Kaplan, PhD, have found over decades of research: Green is good for you.
The Kaplans are at the forefront of research on what they call "restorative environments." They and other psychologists are exploring nature's impact on people's mental functioning, social relationships and even physical well-being. Others are putting that research into practice by working with interior designers, architects and city planners to create psychologically healthy buildings and cities.
In one study, for instance, he asked participants to complete a 40-minute sequence of stroop and binary classification tasks designed to exhaust their directed attention capacity. After the attentionally fatiguing tasks, the randomly assigned participants spent 40 minutes walking in a local nature preserve, walking in an urban area, or sitting quietly while reading magazines and listening to music. After this period, those who had walked in the nature preserve performed better than the other participants on a standard proofreading task. They also reported more positive emotions and less anger.
Even when represented with brief photographic simulations, local natural and urban comparison conditions can have differential effects, says Hartig, an avid hiker and climber who finds restoration in the Sierra Nevada range of California. In one study, he showed people photographs of a forested area and downtown Stockholm and found that the forest slides boosted people's mood.
That limited amount of nature nonetheless has a marked impact on children living nearby, says Kuo. To test her theories, she puts children through a battery of tests and then compares the performance of children living in buildings near a green spot and those living in buildings surrounded by barren concrete. Children who live in greener environments have greater capacity for paying attention, says Kuo, and they're better able to delay gratification and inhibit impulses.
Nature doesn't just have an effect on the mind. Roger S. Ulrich, PhD, director of the Center for Health Systems and Design at Texas A&M University, has found that nature can help the body heal, too.
In his most well-known study, Ulrich investigated the effect that views from windows had on patients recovering from abdominal surgery. He discovered that patients whose hospital rooms overlooked trees had an easier time recovering than those whose rooms overlooked brick walls. Patients able to see nature got out of the hospital faster, had fewer complications and required less pain medication than those forced to stare at a wall.
Like other researchers, Ulrich has found that simply viewing representations of nature can help. In a study at a Swedish hospital, for instance, he found that heart surgery patients in intensive care units could reduce their anxiety and need for pain medication by looking at pictures depicting trees and water.
These and other findings form the basis of Ulrich's theory of supportive design, a series of guidelines for designers of health-care facilities. To soothe patients, families and employees, he says, facilities should incorporate such features as nature views and nature-related art in patients' rooms, aquariums in waiting areas, atria with greenery and fountains and gardens where patients, family and staff can find relief.
In 1881 Oahspe spoke of the therapeutic effects of the color green on the mental condition.
Oahspe Book of Fragapatti, Son of Jehovih: Chapter XIV:
5. Ardi'atta had provided the pastures in green and in red and brown, but the green she had laid near Che-wan, where the avalanza would land; hence, it was called, Hoo'e'tse-gam, signifying, green for the newborn. Consequently, the drujas were delivered from the avalanza on an open green plain, neither dark nor light, suited to the diseased in mind.
6. Fragapatti knew Ardi'atta, for her former kingdom in etherea lay in one of his own provinces, and it was easy for him to commune with her at a distance, and without messengers. So, even before the avalanza landed, he said unto her:
7. I will cast the drujas on the green fields, and as fast as thou and thy hosts can resuscitate them to consciousness, they shall be selected and carried into the houses and nurseries thou hast provided for them.
Google ther·a·peu·tic
adjective: therapeutic 1. of or relating to the healing of disease.
"diagnostic and therapeutic facilities"
synonyms: healing, curative, remedial, medicinal, restorative, salubrious, health-giving, tonic, reparative, corrective, beneficial, good, salutary

Page 283 of Darkness, Dawn And Destiny (DRAWN FROM OAHSPE) by Augustine Cahill says Oahspe clearly states that human life develops on many of the great central suns. This may seem incredible, but let us reflect a moment. If the sun is an atomic furnance no physical matter anywhere near it can exist in anything but a gaseous condition.
Then what are the sun-spots? Solar physicists do not know really what they are, except that they are associated in some way with magnetic storms, but they must be composed of matter of some kind or else they would not be visible. And they are comparatively dark, not even red-hot. Cosmogony [Oahspe] says they are physical worlds, irregular shaped planets which describe orbits around the sun close to its photosphere or vortexian lens. When they are external to the lens they turn their dark surface towards the earth and appear as sun-spots.
In less than 24 hours, AR1785 has stretched and lengthened by more than 40,000 km. It is now more than 11 times as wide as Earth, which makes the active region an easy target for backyard solar telescopes.
One thing hasn't changed: the sprawling sunspot group has a 'beta-gamma-delta' magnetic field that harbors energy for strong solar flares. 
What might you observe about a comet and how might you employ those observations to learn something useful from comets?
comets change in appearance (so we can characterize their appearance: nucleus, coma, straight tail, curved tail)
tails change in length, brightness; tails "break" off
we can measure the size and shapes of their orbits
- distances from Earth (change) 
- distances from Sun (change) 
- orbits are highly elliptical
comets were considered vapors in our atmosphere (Aristotle) because they changed in appearance and because, prior to the Copernican Revolution, all celestial objects were considered to be perfect and changeless; thus, all objects that changed must exist "below" the moon.
Sunspot AR1785 has grown just under 25,000 miles in just 24 hours. It has widened and lengthened and this could lead to instability in the magnetic field of the sunspot.
Comet's Tail Grows In Approach To Sun
A sunspot is first observed as a tiny dark spot called a pore. Not all pores develop into fully-fledged sunspot regions, but those that do undergo an interesting evolution over a period of hours to days. First of all the pore becomes darker and larger, but with no distinguishable internal features. Other spots may break out around the first one. Any significant size sunspot region can be observed to form as a double-ended group, and with an instrument known as a solar magnetograph it can be determined that spots at opposite ends of the group have opposite magnetic polarity (one end being a north pole and the other a south pole). This is in agreement with the idea of magnetic flux lines emerging through the photosphere.
When a spot becomes large enough it develops an egg like form. In the middle there is a very dark area, called the umbra, and around this is a lighter or grey area called the penumbra. In very large and complex groups, some of the large spots may consist of a penumbra that encloses two or even more umbra (maybe the equivalent of a double yolker!).
Sunspot Classifications: A, B, C, D, H (pictured left to right below)
Sunspot Group

Sunspots tend to occur in pairs that have magnetic fields pointing in opposite directions.  A typical spot consists of a dark region called the umbra, surrounded by a lighter region known as the penumbra.   The sunspots appear relatively dark because the surrounding surface of the Sun (the photosphere) is about 10,000 degrees F., while the umbra is about 6,300 degrees F.  Sunspots are quite large as an average size is about the same size as the Earth.
A comet can have more than one tail and the two tails point in opposite directions. 
Motion of sunspots
The camera tracks the movement starting in early February 2011 and continuing for two weeks. Images are sampled one hour apart. 
This is a movie built from images taken by the SDO/HMI instrument over the course of 13 days during the rise of solar cycle 24.
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter VI:
6. There is a sun planet in the centre of the photosphere, at a distance interior, from three thousand miles to thirty thousand miles, and it is light all the way around. But within the body of the photosphere there are numerous planets, some globular, some elongated and irregular. These are usually called sun-spots. Because when they present their negative surface toward the earth they seem black. For the most part these planets in the photosphere are rather external than internal at the times they appear as spots. They have independent motions in their respective places.
Sunspots average size is about the same size as the Earth = planetary size 
The very dark area, called the umbra = planet or nucleus
Around the dark area is a lighter or grey area called the penumbra = atmosphere of planet or coma
large spots may consist of a penumbra that encloses two or even more umbra = a planet and satellites
Sunspot Classifications: A, B, C, D, H (pictured left to right below)
Sunspots occur in pairs that have magnetic fields pointing in opposite directions = like 2 comet tails pointing in opposite directions
Sunspot AR1785 stretched and lengthened by more than 40,000 km...comets change in appearance, tails change in length
Fate of sunspots may be like the fate of more than half the comets:
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter II:
10. ...all such solutions of corpor are of like nature, being as the beginning or as the incomplete condensation of a planet.
11. They do not all, nor half of them, ripen into planets. But their vortices are often broken and they return again into sublimated solutions, and are lost to mortal sight.
"their vortices are often broken and they return again into sublimated solutions, and are lost to mortal sight."
"Groups of sunspots grow and die over a matter of days."
Sunspots acting like distant earth-like planets
Sunspots Might Be Fooling Us Into Seeing Distant Earth-like Planets
By News Staff | July 5th 2014 02:30 PM
These "Doppler shifts" result from subtle changes in the star's velocity caused by the gravitational tugs of orbiting planets, but Doppler shifts of a star's absorption lines can also result from magnetic events like sunspots originating within the star itself -- giving false clues of a planet that does not actually exist.
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter V:
18. The difference, therefore, on the moon, in temperature below blood-heat and what it now must be, must correspond exactly with its comparative slowness (one revolution a month), as to the loss manifested on the earth. Now, although the student will discover the moon hath fallen to a temperature far below zero, yet it emitteth both light and heat.
"the moon hath fallen to a temperature far below zero"
Over the course of a full lunar day and night, the temperature on the Moon can vary wildly, from around +200 to -200 degrees Celsius (+392 to -328 degrees Fahrenheit),
Moon temperature can fall to -328 degrees Fahrenheit[far below zero].
35 K (−238 °C)[94] and just 26 K close to the winter solstice in north polar Hermite Crater. This is the coldest temperature in the Solar System ever measured by a spacecraft, colder even than the surface of Pluto.[93]
In course of producing the first ever temperature map of the moon, Nasa
  discovered that at its south pole temperatures are lower than on Pluto,
  despite being far nearer to the sun.
Temperatures there were measured at 397 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 238 Celsius)
  below zero, just 62 degrees Fahrenheit (35 Celsius) higher than absolute
  zero, the lowest temperature possible.
The discovery was based on information from Nasa's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter which started its science mission last week.
New Temperature Maps Provide a 'Whole New Way of Seeing the Moon' 09.17.09
"After decades of speculation, Diviner has given us the first confirmation that these strange, permanently dark and extremely cold places actually exist on our moon," said science team member Ashwin Vasavada from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. "Their presence greatly increases the likelihood that water or other compounds are frozen there. Diviner has lived up to its name."
The Diviner "commissioning phase" observations provide a snapshot in time of current polar temperatures that will evolve with the lunar seasons.
"It is safe to conclude that the temperatures in these super-cold regions are definitely low enough to cold-trap water ice, as well as other more volatile compounds for extended periods," Paige said. "The existence of such cold traps has been predicted theoretically for almost 50 years. Diviner is now providing detailed information regarding their spatial distribution and temperatures."
"The existence of such cold traps has been predicted theoretically for almost 50 years."
2009 - 50 = 1959
According to NASA the existence of cold traps on the moon (temperatures far below zero) were not predicted theoretically by man untill 1959 or after, 78 years AFTER Oahspe said the moon hath fallen to a temperature far below zero.
First logs on the Moon, Apollo 15, 1971. These temperature versus depth logs parallel similar surveys by Lord Kelvin in 1869. The lunar temperature probes continued to transmit data to Earth after the astronauts left the Moon.
Solar Wind magnetic field spirals (below):
Figure 3: Ideal Parker spiral magnetic field lines between 0 and 25 AU for a solar wind speed of 450 km s–1. Black, blue, and red lines show heliographic latitudes of 0, 30, and 60 degrees, respectively.
Cone-shaped solar magnetosphere (below):
May 10, 2012, scientists compile data from IBEX, NASA's twin Voyager spacecraft, and computer models to show that the solar-system is surrounded by a bubble of charged gas and magnetic fields, rounded at the front and trailing into a long tail behind. The bubble is called an astrosphere, or -- in the case of the one around our sun -- a heliosphere.
What NASA discovered in 2012 looks like the cone-shaped bubble surrounding the sun and the solar system drawn by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe back in 1881 57 years before scientist discovered the spiraling Solar Wind. Newton, Descartes, Swedenborg, or Andrew Jackson Davis did not draw or describe this cone-shaped spiraling Solar Wind. 

Solar Wind spirals Parker3 D
image hosting free

Cone shaped heliosphere solar system
adult image hosting

OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY CH. VI:3 says "by the roads of a COMET do we DISCOVER the SPIRALITY of the CURVE of the Master's vortex [Sun's vortex]. You can CLEARLY SEE from the image above (of the comet's orbit) the bow or cone-shaped CURVE of the Master's vortex (Sun's vortex as drawn by John Ballou Newbrough).
Oahspe - Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter II:
7. When as a comet (or nebula) the m'vortex hath not attained to an orbit of its own, it is carried in the currents of the master vortex, which currents are elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic. (See cut C, Fig. 4.) Hence the so-called eccentric travel of comets.
Comet's orbit close to sun then far away from sun, eccentric travel of comets.
Comets follow a orbital path that match the m'vortex'ya (negative currents) of the sun's vortex, which  go out from the sun to the outer extreme or poles of the vortex, then come back to the sun at the other end.
The planets follow an orbital path that match the positive vortex'ya of the sun that rotate in circles at right angles around the sun.
15. The positive force of the vortex is, therefore, from the external toward the internal; and the negative force of the vortex is toward the poles, and in the ascendant toward the pole external from the sun centre.

Ellipitical hyperbolic comet orbits
free picture upload

http://jolomo.net/solarsystem/1937.09.html  (Illustration above) Article No. 16 in a study of the Solar System
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter VI:
4. ... The nearer the comet approacheth an elliptic course, the longer will it live [periodic returns]; the opposite condition applieth to hyperbolic comets, for they oft die or dissolve in one journey [no return]. If a comet be seen today in hyperbole, and in any angle of the heavens; and if, in ten years or a hundred years, a comet be seen in the same place, it would be an error to say it was the same comet.
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY chapter ll:25 says comets contain corpor in a gaseous state. From the book COMETS by Zim "astronomers now know that the head of a comet is nothing more than a huge cloud of gas...Most of what we see is very thin gas, so there is very little to a comet's head." Oahspe BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY chapter ll:18 says "of nebulae within the Sun's vortex, where they are usually called comets, there are upward of eight(8) or ten(10) new ones every year." COMETS by Herbert Spencer Zim says a few comets are discovered each year, sometimes as many as a dozen (1957).
Lifetime for a comet = tens of thousands of years.
OAHSPE: Book of Lika Chapter 1:
This vortex, when first formed by Aclonguin, was three hundred thousand million miles long and was cometary thirty thousand years in Aclon-guin's hands.
Comets which orbit the inner solar system are very short-lived, lasting no more than a few tens of thousands of years on average.
For example, we have Haley’s comet which is quite well-known since it passes the Sun once every 75 years or so, and this comet will be completely sublimated and disappear after only 10,000 years or about 100 rotations around the Sun.
This is a typical lifetime for a comet. - Katrin Ros, a researcher in Astrophysics at Lund University, Sweden.
Halley's Comet.
Halley's overall lifespan is difficult to predict, and opinions do vary.
In 2002, David C. Jewitt conducted a study that indicated that Halley will likely evaporate, or split in two, within the next few tens of thousands of years.
"few tens of thousands of years" = 30,000 years
David C. Jewitt (born 1958) is an English astronomer and professor of astronomy at UCLA's Earth, Planetary, and Space Science Department in California.
He was born in 1958 in England, and is a 1979 graduate of University College, London (UCL). Jewitt received an M.Sc. and a Ph.D. in astronomy at the California Institute of Technology in 1980 and 1983, respectively. His research interests cover all aspects of the solar system, including the trans-Neptunian Solar System, Solar System formation, ice in the asteroids and the physical properties of comets.
John Newbrough's (Oahspe's) number of 30,000 years for the lifespan of a comet agrees with modern astrophysicists calculations for the life-span of a comet.
Solar System's "Nose" Found; Aimed at Constellation Scorpius.
A NASA spacecraft has uncovered the solar system's "nose," which points in the direction our sun is moving through the
Milky Way galaxy, astronomers say.

Scorpius is one of the constellations of the zodiac. Its name is Latin for scorpion, and its symbol is (Unicode ?). It lies between Libra to the west and Sagittarius to the east. It is a large constellation located in the southern hemisphere near the center of the Milky Way.

Just as Oahspe illustrates the nose of the earth's magnetosphere-vortex points toward the sun (center of solar system) and a comet's nose points toward the sun (center), the sun's magnetosphere-vortex is aimed at the Constellation Scorpius near the center of the Milky Way galaxy.
A source accelerating Galactic cosmic rays to unprecedented energy discovered at the centre of the Milky Way
Scientists have long thought cosmic rays from inside our galaxy come from supernova explosions, but a new study has fingered a second source: the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way. With this new result, the search for cosmic ray origins, which has frustrated scientists for more than 100 years, has taken an unexpected new twist.

Full Definition of vortex.
plural vortices play, also vortexes.
1 :  something that resembles a whirlpool.
2 a :  a mass of fluid (as a liquid) with a whirling or circular motion that tends to form a cavity or vacuum in the center of the circle.
Vortex = "form a cavity or vacuum in the center" = "supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way".
Radiation or the radio-active force comes from the center (negative vortexian currents).
The Solar wind and Galactic Cosmic rays originate from the center and move outward.
cos·mic ray.
plural noun: cosmic rays.
a highly energetic atomic nucleus or other particle traveling through space at a speed approaching that of light.
so·lar wind.
the continuous flow of charged particles from the sun that permeates the solar system.
The lowest energy cosmic rays arrive from the Sun in a stream of charged particles known as the solar wind, but pinning down the origin of the higher-energy particles [galactic cosmic rays] is made difficult as they twist and turn in the magnetic fields of interstellar space.

If one could imagine a very long serpent in spiral form, constantly turning its head in at one pole, and its tail at the other, and continuously crawling upon its own spirality, such a view would somewhat illustrate the currents of a vortex. - Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Ch III: 25.

Above illustration of solar system currents and a stream of charged particles in spiral form, constantly turning its head in at one pole, and its tail at the other. Both the solar wind and galactic cosmic rays arrive from the center of the vortex (the sun center, and the Milky Way galaxy center). The solar wind and galactic cosmic rays are caused by negative vortexian currents in spiral form that go out from the center head at one pole to its tail at the other end, the opposite of gravitation called radiation.
Gravity and Radiation
fiery spiral arms of radiation mother-light reach out from the equator of its central sun [negative vortex'ya]...
gravitating father-light pull spirally inward from the heavens toward the poles of the centering giant sun [positive vortex'ya]...
(Walter Russell: The Secret of Light, pp. 149-150).

Oahspe greatest book of the Age

If you find this information helpful to you please feel free to make a $20 dollar donation and help support my research.  Thank You.

If you want to donate more than $20 enter the amount here. Thank you for supporting my work.

[Sign My Guestbook] [View My Guestbook]

With a $20 or more donation I am also avaliable for a 30 minute phone consultation where I will answer questions you may have. Email me or leave a comment if you want a phone consultation.